4 research outputs found

    Point sur les vaccinations Ă  risque pendant la grossesse

    No full text
    Pendant la pandémie de grippe A, l’utilisation de la vaccination chez la femme enceinte a suscité beaucoup d’interrogations. Les épidémies, la facilité de voyager, la couverture vaccinale insuffisante, exposent ces patientes à des infections pouvant avoir des conséquences graves sur la grossesse et le futur enfant. Le principe de précaution prévalant chez la femme enceinte, il est essentiel de mesurer le risque épidémiologique de la maladie, afin d’éviter la survenue d’évènements indésirables. L’administration vaccinale prophylactique contre certaines infections doit être évaluée avec prudence, en raison du nombre réduit de données disponibles. Elle dépendra de la nature du vaccin, de ses effets indésirables, du stade de la grossesse, du bénéfice apporté à la mère et au futur nouveau-né, et des antécédents cliniques maternels. Quelle que soit la nature du vaccin administré, l’interruption de la grossesse n’est pas justifiée ; son évolution devra être surveillée afin de déceler la survenue de complications

    Gemcitabine-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: A Case Report of Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease

    No full text
    Introduction Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent frequently used by for the treatment of several malignancies both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Although myelosuppression is the most adverse event of this therapy, gemcitabine might induce severe pulmonary toxicities. We describe a case of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) related to gemcitabine. Case Presentation The patient was an 83-year-old man with a metastatic pancreatic cancer who was treated by gemcitabine as first-line therapy. He was in good health and received no other chemotherapy. A dose of 1000 mg/m 2 of gemcitabine was administered over a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. After a period of 6 months, a complete response was observed. Nevertheless, the patient developed a severe dyspnea, with arterial hypoxemia and very low lung diffusion for carbon monoxide. A CT scan showed diffuse ground glass opacities with septal lines, bilateral pleural effusion, and lymph node enlargement. On echocardiography, there was a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure and normal left ventricular pressures. Right heart catheterization confirmed pulmonary hypertension and normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Diagnosis of PVOD was made, and a gemcitabine-induced toxicity was suspected. A symptomatic treatment was started. At last follow-up, patient was in functional class I with near-normal of CT scan, arterial blood gases, and echocardiography. A gemcitabine-induced PVOD is the more likely diagnosis

    Quelle formation académique pour les nouvelles missions de pharmacie clinique à l’officine ? Exemple du bilan partagé de médication du sujet âgé

    No full text
    PURPOSE Universal cancer peptide–based vaccine (UCPVax) is a therapeutic vaccine composed of two highly selected helper peptides to induce CD4+ T helper-1 response directed against telomerase. This phase Ib/IIa trial was designed to test the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a three-dose schedule in patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with refractory NSCLC were assigned to receive three vaccination doses of UCPVax (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 1 mg) using a Bayesian-based phase Ib followed by phase IIa de-escalating design. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity and immune response after three first doses of vaccine. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 59 patients received UCPVax; 95% had three prior lines of systemic therapy. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 15 patients treated in phase Ib. The maximum tolerated dose was 1 mg. Fifty-one patients were eligible for phase IIa. The third and sixth dose of UCPVax induced specific CD4+ T helper 1 response in 56% and 87.2% of patients, respectively, with no difference between three dose levels. Twenty-one (39%) patients achieved disease control (stable disease, n = 20; complete response, n = 1). The 1-year OS was 34.1% (95% CI, 23.1 to 50.4), and the median OS was 9.7 months, with no significant difference between dose levels. The 1-year progression-free survival and the median OS were 17.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 38.3) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.7) in immune responders ( P = .015) and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.7 to 30.8) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10) in nonresponders ( P = .005), respectively. CONCLUSION UCPVax was highly immunogenic and safe and provide interesting 1-year OS rate in heavily pretreated advanced NSCLC
    corecore