Erratum: Author Correction: Surgical Standards for Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials with Pathological Complete Response Endpoint.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41523-018-0074-6.]

Surgical Standards for Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials with Pathological Complete Response Endpoint.

Advances in the surgical management of the axilla in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially those with node positive disease at diagnosis, have led to changes in practice and more judicious use of axillary lymph node dissection that may minimize morbidity from surgery. However, there is still significant confusion about how to optimally manage the axilla, resulting in variation among practices. From the viewpoint of drug development, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains paramount and appropriate assessment of residual disease-the primary endpoint of many drug therapy trials in the neoadjuvant setting-is critical. Therefore decreasing the variability, especially in a multicenter clinical trial setting, and establishing a minimum standard to ensure consistency in clinical trial data, without mandating axillary lymph node dissection, for all patients is necessary. The key elements which include proper staging and identification of nodal involvement at diagnosis, and appropriately targeted management of the axilla at the time of surgical resection are presented. The following protocols have been adopted as standard procedure by the I-SPY2 trial for management of axilla in patients with node positive disease, and present a framework for prospective clinical trials and practice

Endocrine therapy initiation, discontinuation and adherence and breast imaging among 21-gene recurrence score assay-eligible women under age 65

Abstract Background Aside from chemotherapy utilization, limited data are available on the relationship between gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and breast cancer care. We assessed the relationship between GEP testing and additional variables and the outcomes of endocrine therapy initiation, discontinuation and adherence, and breast imaging exams in women under age 65 years. Methods Data from five state cancer registries were linked with claims data and GEP results. We assessed variables associated with survivorship care outcomes in an incident cohort of 5014 commercially insured women under age 65 years, newly diagnosed with stage I or II hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) non-positive breast cancer from 2006 to 2010. Results Among tested women, those with high Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) were significantly less likely to initiate endocrine therapy than women with low RS tumors (OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.81); P = 0.01). Among all test-eligible women, receipt of Oncotype DX testing was associated with a greater likelihood of endocrine therapy initiation (OR 2.48 (95% CI 2.03 to 3.04); P <0.0001). The odds of initiation were also significantly higher for tested vs. untested women among women who did not initiate chemotherapy within six months of diagnosis (OR 3.25 (95% CI 2.53 to 4.16)), with no effect in women who received chemotherapy. Discontinuation and adherence and breast imaging exams were unrelated to tested status or RS. Conclusions Lower endocrine therapy initiation rates among women with high RS tumors and among untested women not receiving chemotherapy are concerning, given its established efficacy. Additional research is needed to suggest mechanisms to close this gap

Clinical outcomes of de novo metastatic HER2-positive inflammatory breast cancer

Abstract Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, aggressive form of breast cancer that presents as de novo metastatic disease in 20–30% of cases, with one-third of cases demonstrating HER2-positivity. There has been limited investigation into locoregional therapy utilization following HER2-directed systemic therapy for these patients, and their locoregional progression or recurrence (LRPR) and survival outcomes. Patients with de novo HER2-positive metastatic IBC (mIBC) were identified from an IRB-approved IBC registry at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Clinical, pathology, and treatment data were abstracted. Rates of LRPR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pathologic complete response (pCR) were determined. Seventy-eight patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 were identified. First-line systemic therapy comprised chemotherapy for most patients (97.4%) and HER2-directed therapy for all patients (trastuzumab [47.4%]; trastuzumab+pertuzumab [51.3%]; or trastuzumab emtansine [1.3%]). At a median follow-up of 2.7 years, the median PFS was 1.0 year, and the median OS was 4.6 years. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of LRPR was 20.7% and 29.0%, respectively. Mastectomy was performed after systemic therapy in 41/78 patients (52.6%); 10 had a pCR (24.4%) and all were alive at last follow-up (1.3–8.9 years after surgery). Among 56 patients who were alive and LRPR-free at one year, 10 developed LRPR (surgery group = 1; no-surgery group = 9). In conclusion, patients with de novo HER2-positive mIBC who undergo surgery have favorable outcomes. More than half of patients received systemic and local therapy with good locoregional control and prolonged survival, suggesting a potential role for local therapy

Abstract GS5-02: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly associated with disease recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Preplanned correlative results from clinical trial BRE12-158

Abstract Background: A significant proportion of patients with early-stage TNBC are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Sequencing of ctDNA after surgery can be used to detect minimal residual disease and predict which patients may experience clinical recurrence. Methods: BRE12-158 is a recently completed Phase II clinical trial which randomized early-stage TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC to post-neoadjuvant genomically-directed therapy vs treatment of physician choice. 151 patients had a plasma sample collected at the time of treatment assignment (after surgery and radiation). ctDNA was successfully sequenced in 150 patients. 148 of the 150 sequenced patients had clinical follow-up. Sequencing was performed by Foundation Medicine using the FoundationOne Liquid assay which profiles for 70 commonly mutated oncogenes. Presence of mutated ctDNA was associated with distant disease free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis using the Log-Rank test, and in multi-variate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Mutated ctDNA was detected in 94 of 148 sequenced patients (64%). TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene consistent with prior genomic studies of TNBC. At 16.7 months of median follow-up, detection of ctDNA was significantly associated with an inferior DDFS (median DDFS 32.5 months vs. Not Reached, p=0.0030). At 24 months, the DDFS probability was 53% in ctDNA-positive patients as compared to 81% in ctDNA-negative patients. In multi-variate analysis, when considering significant covariates, including: residual cancer burden (RCB); number of positive lymph nodes; tumor size; stage; grade; age; and race; detection of ctDNA remained independently associated with inferior DDFS (HR=3.1, CI: 1.4-6.8, p=0.0048). Similarly, detection of ctDNA was associated with inferior OS in univariate (p=0.021) and multi-variate analysis (HR=2.7, CI:1.1-6.2, p=0.022). Lastly, we observed a correlation between higher maximum somatic allele frequency and a shorter DDFS interval in multivariate analysis (HR=4.7, CI: 1.04-21.1, p=0.044) and shorter OS (HR=4.9, CI:1.06-22.4, p=0.041), suggesting that the quantitative degree of ctDNA burden is associated with clinical outcome. Conclusions: Detection of ctDNA in early-stage TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictor of disease recurrence, and represents an important novel stratification factor for future post-neoadjuvant trials. Citation Format: Milan Radovich, Guanglong Jiang, Christopher Chitambar, Rita Nanda, Carla Falkson, Filipa C. Lynce, Christopher Gallagher, Claudine Isaacs, Marcelo Blaya, Elisavet Paplomata, Radhika Walling, Karen Daily, Reshma Mahtani, Michael A. Thompson, Robert Graham, Maureen E. Cooper, Dean C. Pavlick, Lee Albacker, Jeff Gregg, Casey L. Bales, Bradley A. Hancock, Erica Cantor, Fei Shen, Anna Maria V. Storniolo, Sunil Badve, Tarah Ballinger, Kathy D. Miller, Bryan P. Schneider. Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly associated with disease recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Preplanned correlative results from clinical trial BRE12-158 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-02

TBCRC 039: a phase II study of preoperative ruxolitinib with or without paclitaxel for triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have overall poor clinical outcomes, with triple-negative IBC (TN-IBC) being associated with the worst survival, warranting the investigation of novel therapies. Preclinical studies implied that ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, may be an effective therapy for TN-IBC. Methods We conducted a randomized phase II study with nested window-of-opportunity in TN-IBC. Treatment-naïve patients received a 7-day run-in of RUX alone or RUX plus paclitaxel (PAC). After the run-in, those who received RUX alone proceeded to neoadjuvant therapy with either RUX + PAC or PAC alone for 12 weeks; those who had received RUX + PAC continued treatment for 12 weeks. All patients subsequently received 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide prior to surgery. Research tumor biopsies were performed at baseline (pre-run-in) and after run-in therapy. Tumors were evaluated for phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) by immunostaining, and a subset was also analyzed by RNA-seq. The primary endpoint was the percent of pSTAT3-positive pre-run-in tumors that became pSTAT3-negative. Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR). Results Overall, 23 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 completed preoperative therapy. Two patients achieved pCR (8.7%). pSTAT3 and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling decreased in post-run-in biopsies of RUX-treated samples, while sustained treatment with RUX + PAC upregulated IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling compared to RUX alone. Both treatments decreased GZMB+ T cells implying immune suppression. RUX alone effectively inhibited JAK/STAT3 signaling but its combination with PAC led to incomplete inhibition. The immune suppressive effects of RUX alone and in combination may negate its growth inhibitory effects on cancer cells. Conclusion In summary, the use of RUX in TN-IBC was associated with a decrease in pSTAT3 levels despite lack of clinical benefit. Cancer cell-specific-targeting of JAK2/STAT3 or combinations with immunotherapy may be required for further evaluation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling as a cancer therapeutic target. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02876302. Registered 23 August 2016

Abstract PD9-10: BRE12-158: A post-neoadjuvant, randomized phase 2 trial of personalized therapy vs. treatment of physician’s choice for patients with residual triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Purpose: Patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have high risk of recurrence with prior data suggesting improved outcomes with capecitabine. Targeted agents have demonstrated activity across multiple cancer types. BRE12-158 was a phase 2, multicenter trial that randomized TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC to genomically-directed therapy vs. treatment of physician choice (TPC). Patients and Methods: From March 2014 to December 2018, 197 patients were enrolled. Residual tumors were sequenced using a next generation sequencing (NGS) test. A molecular tumor board adjudicated all results. Patients were randomized to 4 cycles of genomically-directed therapy (arm A) vs. TPC (arm B). Patients without a target were assigned to arm B. Primary endpoint was 2-year disease free survival (DFS) among randomized patients. Secondary/exploratory endpoints included: distant disease free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity assessment, time-based evolution of therapy, and drug-specific outcomes. Results: 193 patients were randomized or were assigned to arm B. The estimated 2-year DFS was 56.6% (95%CI:0.45-0.70) for arm A vs. 62.4% (95%CI:0.52-0.75) for randomized arm B. No difference was seen in DFS, DDFS, or OS for the entire or randomized populations. There was increased uptake of capecitabine for TPC over time. Patients randomized later had less distant recurrences. ctDNA status remained a significant predictor of outcome with some patients demonstrating clearance with post-neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Genomically directed therapy was not superior to TPC for patients with residual TNBC after NAC. Capecitabine should remain the standard of care; however, the activity of other agents in this setting provides rationale for testing optimal combinations to improve outcomes for this high-risk population. ctDNA should be considered a standard covariate for trials in this setting. Citation Format: Bryan P Schneider, Guanglong Jiang, Tarah J Ballinger, Fei Shen, Christopher Chitambar, Rita Nanda, Carla Falkson, Filipa C Lynce, Christopher Gallagher, Claudine Isaacs, Marcelo Blaya, Elisavet Paplomata, Radhika Walling, Karen Daily, Reshma Mahtani, Michael A Thompson, Robert Graham, Maureen E Cooper, Dean C Pavlick, Lee A Albacker, Jeffery Gregg, Jeffery P Solzak, Yu-Hsiang Chen, Casey L Bales, Erica Cantor, Bradley A Hancock, Nawal Kassem, Paul Helft, Bert O'Neil, Anna Maria Storniolo, Sunil Badve, Kathy D Miller, Milan Radovich. BRE12-158: A post-neoadjuvant, randomized phase 2 trial of personalized therapy vs. treatment of physician’s choice for patients with residual triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-10

BRE12-158: A postneoadjuvant, randomized phase II trial of personalized therapy versus treatment of physician\u27s choice for patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer

Purpose: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have high risk of recurrence with prior data suggesting improved outcomes with capecitabine. Targeted agents have demonstrated activity across multiple cancer types. BRE12-158 was a phase II, multicenter trial that randomly allocated patients with TNBC with residual disease after NAC to genomically directed therapy versus treatment of physician choice (TPC). Patients and methods: From March 2014 to December 2018, 193 patients were enrolled. Residual tumors were sequenced using a next-generation sequencing test. A molecular tumor board adjudicated all results. Patients were randomly allocated to four cycles of genomically directed therapy (arm A) versus TPC (arm B). Patients without a target were assigned to arm B. Primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) among randomly assigned patients. Secondary/exploratory end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, toxicity assessment, time-based evolution of therapy, and drug-specific outcomes. Results: One hundred ninety-three patients were randomly allocated or were assigned to arm B. The estimated 2-year DFS for the randomized population only was 56.6% (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.70) for arm A versus 62.4% (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.75) for arm B. No difference was seen in DFS, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival for the entire or randomized populations. There was increased uptake of capecitabine for TPC over time. Patients randomly allocated later had less distant recurrences. Circulating tumor DNA status remained a significant predictor of outcome with some patients demonstrating clearance with postneoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Genomically directed therapy was not superior to TPC for patients with residual TNBC after NAC. Capecitabine should remain the standard of care; however, the activity of other agents in this setting provides rationale for testing optimal combinations to improve outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA should be considered a standard covariate for trials in this setting