POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF TRENDS AND VARIATIONS IN RADIOTHERAPY AS PART OF PRIMARY TREATMENT OF CANCER IN THE SOUTHERN NETHERLANDS BETWEEN 1988 AND 2006, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON BREAST AND RECTAL CANCER

Purpose: To explore current variations in the use of primary radiotherapy (RT) in a region with two RT departments with adjacent referral areas, one in the eastern and one in the western sector of the southern region of the Netherlands. Methods and Materials: We calculated the proportion of 147,588 patients with newly diagnosed cancer between 1988 and 2006 in the southern Netherlands who received primary RT. Especially for breast and rectal cancer patients we studied primary RT use according to stage (breast cancer) and age and separately for the eastern and western sectors. Results: The number of patients with new diagnoses receiving primary RT increased from 1,668 patients in 1988 to 2,971 patients in 2006, with the proportion of the overall patients receiving RT remaining more or less unchanged (30%). However, only 20% of elderly patients (75+ years) received primary RT. Over time, more patients with prostate and rectal cancer, fewer patients with lung and bladder cancer or Hodgkin's lymphoma, and, recently, more patients with cervical or endometrial cancer received RT. The proportion of patients with most other tumor types treated with RT remained more or less unchanged. The total RT rate was slightly higher for patients in the eastern sector. Of particular note, patients with breast or rectal cancer in the eastern sector were significantly more likely to receive primary RT than were their counterparts in the western sector (odds ratio = 1.4, 95 % confidence interval =1.4-1.5, and odds ratio = 1.4, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-1.6, respectively). Conclusions: Although the number of RT-treated patients increased substantially during 1988 to 2006, the proportion remained essentially unchanged. In addition, large variations were found in referral rates for RT, especially in later years, between the eastern and the western sectors of the region. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc

Adherence to national guidelines for treatment and outcome of endometrial cancer stage I in relation to co-morbidity in southern Netherlands 1995-2008

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) occurs more frequently amongst women over 60 years old, who often also suffer from co-morbidity. Since treatment guidelines are derived from clinical trials that usually exclude such patients, nevertheless these guidelines are also applied for older EC patients. We assessed the independent influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment modalities and survival of patients with stage I EC in everyday clinical practice, thereby also examining the implementation of Dutch guidelines on treatment, since 2000. Methods: All 2099 stage I EC patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 in the southern Netherlands were registered in the ECR (Eindhoven Cancer Registry) were included for analysis of the influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment and survival. For co-morbidity we used a modified version of Charlson's list, uniquely recorded in the ECR since 1993. A subgroup analysis was performed of patients who should have received adjuvant radiotherapy based on the risk factors advised in the Dutch guidelines of 2000. We considered five periods (1995-97; 1989-2000; 2001-03; 2004-06; 2007-08). Results: Having two or more co-morbid conditions resulted in a significant reduction of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (Odds Ratio: 0.6, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 0.3-1.0)) but receiving adjuvant radiotherapy did not appear to improve survival. After adjustment for age, tumour stage, tumour grade, period of diagnosis and treatment, co-morbidity increased the risk of death, especially diabetes (Hazard Ratio (HR) for mortality: 2.9,95% CI: 2.2-4.0), a previous cancer (HR: 2.6, 95%CI: 1.9-3.7) and cardiovascular disease (HR: 2.3, 95%Cl: 1.7-3.2). The combination of two or more co-morbid conditions resulted in a HR of 3.0 (95%CI: 2.2-3.9). Conclusion: Co-morbidity decreased the likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage I EC qualifying to undergo this according to the Dutch guidelines of 2000. Whereas adjuvant radiotherapy did not seem to affect survival in those patients, co-morbidity significantly did. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Invasive cervical carcinoma: high dose-rate brachytherapy following external irradiation: a retrospective analysis of morbidity and pattern of relapse

A

Adherence to national guidelines for treatment and outcome of endometrial cancer stage I in relation to co-morbidity in southern Netherlands 1995-2008

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) occurs more frequently amongst women over 60 years old, who often also suffer from co-morbidity. Since treatment guidelines are derived from clinical trials that usually exclude such patients, nevertheless these guidelines are also applied for older EC patients. We assessed the independent influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment modalities and survival of patients with stage I EC in everyday clinical practice, thereby also examining the implementation of Dutch guidelines on treatment, since 2000. Methods: All 2099 stage I EC patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2008 in the southern Netherlands were registered in the ECR (Eindhoven Cancer Registry) were included for analysis of the influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment and survival. For co-morbidity we used a modified version of Charlson's list, uniquely recorded in the ECR since 1993. A subgroup analysis was performed of patients who should have received adjuvant radiotherapy based on the risk factors advised in the Dutch guidelines of 2000. We considered five periods (1995-97; 1989-2000; 2001-03; 2004-06; 2007-08). Results: Having two or more co-morbid conditions resulted in a significant reduction of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (Odds Ratio: 0.6, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 0.3-1.0)) but receiving adjuvant radiotherapy did not appear to improve survival. After adjustment for age, tumour stage, tumour grade, period of diagnosis and treatment, co-morbidity increased the risk of death, especially diabetes (Hazard Ratio (HR) for mortality: 2.9,95% CI: 2.2-4.0), a previous cancer (HR: 2.6, 95%CI: 1.9-3.7) and cardiovascular disease (HR: 2.3, 95%Cl: 1.7-3.2). The combination of two or more co-morbid conditions resulted in a HR of 3.0 (95%CI: 2.2-3.9). Conclusion: Co-morbidity decreased the likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage I EC qualifying to undergo this according to the Dutch guidelines of 2000. Whereas adjuvant radiotherapy did not seem to affect survival in those patients, co-morbidity significantly did. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved