Nightly treatment of primary insomnia with prolonged release melatonin for 6 months: a randomized placebo controlled trial on age and endogenous melatonin as predictors of efficacy and safety

<p>Background: Melatonin is extensively used in the USA in a non-regulated manner for sleep disorders. Prolonged release melatonin (PRM) is licensed in Europe and other countries for the short term treatment of primary insomnia in patients aged 55 years and over. However, a clear definition of the target patient population and well-controlled studies of long-term efficacy and safety are lacking. It is known that melatonin production declines with age. Some young insomnia patients also may have low melatonin levels. The study investigated whether older age or low melatonin excretion is a better predictor of response to PRM, whether the efficacy observed in short-term studies is sustained during continued treatment and the long term safety of such treatment.</p> <p>Methods: Adult outpatients (791, aged 18-80 years) with primary insomnia, were treated with placebo (2 weeks) and then randomized, double-blind to 3 weeks with PRM or placebo nightly. PRM patients continued whereas placebo completers were re-randomized 1:1 to PRM or placebo for 26 weeks with 2 weeks of single-blind placebo run-out. Main outcome measures were sleep latency derived from a sleep diary, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Quality of Life (World Health Organzaton-5) Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) and adverse effects and vital signs recorded at each visit.</p> <p>Results: On the primary efficacy variable, sleep latency, the effects of PRM (3 weeks) in patients with low endogenous melatonin (6-sulphatoxymelatonin [6-SMT] ≤8 μg/night) regardless of age did not differ from the placebo, whereas PRM significantly reduced sleep latency compared to the placebo in elderly patients regardless of melatonin levels (-19.1 versus -1.7 min; P = 0.002). The effects on sleep latency and additional sleep and daytime parameters that improved with PRM were maintained or enhanced over the 6-month period with no signs of tolerance. Most adverse events were mild in severity with no clinically relevant differences between PRM and placebo for any safety outcome.</p> <p>Conclusions: The results demonstrate short- and long-term efficacy and safety of PRM in elderly insomnia patients. Low melatonin production regardless of age is not useful in predicting responses to melatonin therapy in insomnia. The age cut-off for response warrants further investigation.</p&gt

MRP3 is a sex determining gene in the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata

A broad diversity of sex-determining systems has evolved in eukaryotes. However, information on the mechanisms of sex determination for unicellular microalgae is limited, including for diatoms, key-players of ocean food webs. Here we report the identification of a mating type (MT) determining gene for the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata. By comparing the expression profile of the two MTs, we find five MT-biased genes, of which one, MRP3, is expressed exclusively in MT+ strains in a monoallelic manner. A short tandem repeat of specific length in the region upstream of MRP3 is consistently present in MT+ and absent in MT- strains. MRP3 overexpression in an MT- strain induces sex reversal: the transgenic MT- can mate with another MT- strain and displays altered regulation of the other MT-biased genes, indicating that they lie downstream. Our data show that a relatively simple genetic program is involved in defining the MT in P. multistriata

Efficacy and Safety of Roluperidone for the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

This is a placebo-controlled multi-national trial of roluperidone, a compound with antagonist properties for 5-HT2A, sigma2, and α1A-adrenergic receptors, targeting negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. This trial follows a previous trial that demonstrated roluperidone superiority over placebo in a similar patient population. Roluperidone 32 mg/day, roluperidone 64 mg/day, or placebo was administered for 12 weeks to 513 patients with schizophrenia with moderate to severe negative symptoms. The primary endpoint was the PANSS-derived Negative Symptom Factor Score (NSFS) and the key secondary endpoint was Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) total score. NSFS scores were lower (improved) for roluperidone 64 mg compared to placebo and marginally missing statistical significance for the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis data set (P ≤ .064), but reached nominal significance (P ≤ .044) for the modified-ITT (m-ITT) data set. Changes in PSP total score were statistically significantly better on roluperidone 64 mg compared to placebo for both ITT and m-ITT (P ≤ .021 and P ≤ .017, respectively). Results of this trial confirm the potential of roluperidone as a treatment of negative symptoms and improving everyday functioning in patients with schizophrenia. Study registration: Eudra-CT: 2017-003333-29; NCT03397134

Effects of Roluperidone (MIN-101) on two dimensions of the negative symptoms factor score: Reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression

Recent research has suggested that negative symptoms (NS) can be considered in terms of two different dimensions: reduced expression (expressive deficit) and reduced experience (experiential deficit). Roluperidone, a compound with high affinities for 5 HT2A and sigma2 receptors, has previously shown superiority over placebo on improving NS in a prospective study in patients with schizophrenia. The objective here is to explore the effect of roluperidone compared to placebo, on the 2 domains of the Negative Symptoms. This was a multi-national Phase 2b trial that enrolled 244 symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia who had baseline scores ≥20 on the NS subscale of the PANSS. Patients were randomized to daily monotherapy with roluperidone 32 mg, roluperidone 64 mg, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. All enrolled patients were Caucasian, and 137 (56%) were male. The 3 treatment groups were balanced on all demographic and illness-related baseline characteristics. Both doses of roluperidone were superior to placebo on both domains: Reduced Experience (p ≤ .006 for the 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for the 64 mg) with persistent superiority from Week 2 for the 64 mg dose and Week 8 for the 32 mg dose; Reduced Expression (p ≤ .003 for 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for 64 mg) with similar persistence. Both doses of roluperidone previously improved PANSS negative symptoms in general and demonstrated tolerability in stable schizophrenia patients. The post hoc analysis reported here found the drug to work on both the reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression sub-scales empirically derived from the PANSS

Long-term effects of Roluperidone on negative symptoms of schizophrenia

Roluperidone has antagonist properties for 5-HT , sigma , α - and α -adrenergic receptors, but no dopaminergic binding affinities. In 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), treatment improved negative symptoms of schizophrenia and social functioning among patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms. We report results of the protocol specified analysis of 2 open-label extension studies of 24 and 40 weeks investigating whether improvement of negative symptoms was sustained without significant adverse effects or worsening of psychosis. Following 12-week double-blind phase of both RCTs, patients were eligible to receive monotherapy roluperidone 32 mg/day or 64 mg/day for 24 weeks (trial 1) or 40 weeks (trial 2) in open-label extension study. Trial 1 included 244 patients of whom 142 entered 24-week open-label extension and trial 2 included 513 patients of whom 341 entered 40-week open-label extension. Trial 1 had PANSS negative factor score of Pentagonal Structure Model as primary outcome. Trial 2 had Marder Negative Symptoms Factor Score as primary outcome measure and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total score as secondary outcome. During open-label extensions, continued improvements in negative symptoms and on PSP were observed. Overall rate of symptomatic worsening requiring discontinuation of roluperidone and treatment with an antipsychotic was <10 %. Roluperidone was well tolerated with no meaningful changes in vital signs, laboratory values, weight gain, metabolic indices, or extrapyramidal symptoms. Results of 2 open-label extension trials support roluperidone as a treatment of negative symptoms and social functioning deficits in patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms of schizophrenia