Public and Private Preferences for Policies Related to Meat and Milk from Clones

Agricultural and Food Policy,

Critically Ill Recipients of Weight-Based Fluconazole Meeting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Criteria

Background: Fluconazole-associated liver injury is estimated to occur in <10% of patients; however, effect of weight-based fluconazole dosing on liver injury is unknown. Furthermore, no studies have systematically applied the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) Criteria to identify patients who may have drug-induced liver injury in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Objective: This study evaluated how often patients met DILIN criteria when receiving fluconazole daily doses of <6 mg/kg versus ⩾6 mg/kg. Methods: This dual-center, retrospective cohort study was performed in hospitalized critically ill fluconazole recipients. We compared liver function tests (LFTs) upon fluconazole initiation to peak LFTs within 2 weeks after discontinuation using DILIN criteria. The primary objective was to evaluate the number of patients meeting DILIN criteria when receiving fluconazole daily doses of <6 mg/kg versus ⩾6 mg/kg. Secondary objectives were to evaluate incidence of patients meeting DILIN criteria in patients with renal dysfunction, cirrhosis, septic shock, or those receiving a loading dose. Results: Of 248 patients included, 90% had a documented fungal infection or received empiric therapy for suspected invasive candidiasis. In patients receiving <6 mg/kg of fluconazole, 55% (110/199) met DILIN criteria versus 46.9% (23/49) in the ⩾6 mg/kg cohort (P = .20). Only 14.5% of patients meeting DILIN criteria also met the definition for hepatocellular damage. Weight-based fluconazole dose and creatinine clearance <50 mL/min were not independent risk factors for meeting DILIN criteria. However, 77.3% of patients with cirrhosis met DILIN criteria (OR 4.84 [95% confidence interval, CI, 2.61-9.28]) and 76.3% with septic shock met DILIN criteria (OR 4.56 [95% CI, 2.44-8.88]). Conclusion: Weight-based fluconazole dosing did not affect the number of critically ill recipients who met DILIN criteria. However, DILIN criteria may overestimate the incidence of fluconazole-associated liver injury in critically ill patients

Critically-Ill Recipients of Weight-Based Fluconazole Meeting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) criteria.

Purpose: Fluconazole-associated liver injury is estimated to occur in <10% of patients; however, the effect of weight-based fluconazole dosing on liver injury has not been assessed. This study evaluated how often patients met Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) criteria when receiving fluconazole daily doses of <6mg/kg versus ≥6mg/kg. Methods: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study was performed in critically-ill fluconazole recipients hospitalized from January 2009 to December 2012. It included patients who received ≥3 fluconazole doses with ≥1 dose administered in the intensive care unit. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, presented with acetaminophen toxicity, received fluconazole within 1 week of liver transplantation, or missed >1 fluconazole dose during therapy. We compared liver function tests (LFTs) upon fluconazole initiation to peak LFTs within 2 weeks after fluconazole discontinuation using DILIN criteria. The Fisher’s exact test was used to detect differences in the primary outcome of patients meeting DILIN criteria by weight-based dosing as well as in subgroups of patients with kidney dysfunction, liver disease, septic shock, and those receiving a loading dose. Results: Two-hundred and forty-eight of 767 patients met inclusion criteria; 90% had a documented fungal infection or received empiric therapy for suspected invasive candidiasis. Of the 199 patients receiving <6 mg/kg of fluconazole, 55% met DILIN criteria versus 46.9% of the 49 patients in the ≥6 mg/kg cohort (p=0.20). Only 14.5% of patients meeting DILIN criteria also met the definition for hepatocellular damage. In analysis of subgroups, 77.3% of patients with cirrhosis and 76.3% with septic shock met DILIN criteria (p<0.001 for both compared to those without these conditions). Conclusions: Weight-based fluconazole dosing did not affect the number of critically-ill recipients who met DILIN criteria. However, DILIN criteria may overestimate the incidence of fluconazole-associated liver injury in critically-ill patients

Critically-Ill Recipients of Weight-Based Fluconazole Meeting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) criteria.

Purpose: Fluconazole-associated liver injury is estimated to occur in <10% of patients; however, the effect of weight-based fluconazole dosing on liver injury has not been assessed. This study evaluated how often patients met Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) criteria when receiving fluconazole daily doses of <6mg/kg versus ≥6mg/kg. Methods: This multi-center, retrospective cohort study was performed in critically-ill fluconazole recipients hospitalized from January 2009 to December 2012. It included patients who received ≥3 fluconazole doses with ≥1 dose administered in the intensive care unit. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, presented with acetaminophen toxicity, received fluconazole within 1 week of liver transplantation, or missed >1 fluconazole dose during therapy. We compared liver function tests (LFTs) upon fluconazole initiation to peak LFTs within 2 weeks after fluconazole discontinuation using DILIN criteria. The Fisher’s exact test was used to detect differences in the primary outcome of patients meeting DILIN criteria by weight-based dosing as well as in subgroups of patients with kidney dysfunction, liver disease, septic shock, and those receiving a loading dose. Results: Two-hundred and forty-eight of 767 patients met inclusion criteria; 90% had a documented fungal infection or received empiric therapy for suspected invasive candidiasis. Of the 199 patients receiving <6 mg/kg of fluconazole, 55% met DILIN criteria versus 46.9% of the 49 patients in the ≥6 mg/kg cohort (p=0.20). Only 14.5% of patients meeting DILIN criteria also met the definition for hepatocellular damage. In analysis of subgroups, 77.3% of patients with cirrhosis and 76.3% with septic shock met DILIN criteria (p<0.001 for both compared to those without these conditions). Conclusions: Weight-based fluconazole dosing did not affect the number of critically-ill recipients who met DILIN criteria. However, DILIN criteria may overestimate the incidence of fluconazole-associated liver injury in critically-ill patients

Public and Private Preferences for Animal Cloning Policies

Data on individuals’ private shopping choices are often used to draw conclusions about their desires for food policies. The purpose of this paper is to test this often-implicit assumption using data from a nationwide survey about animal cloning. We find that although individuals’ private choices indicate a strong desire to avoid meat and milk from cloned cattle, public choices predict that only 40.29% have a positive WTP for such a ban. The results suggest caution is necessary when inferring public preferences from private choices

Who Participates in Household Scanning Panels?

We compare two widely used household scanning panels maintained by the Nielsen Company and Information Resources Inc. to a random sample of the U.S. population. Results indicate that the demographic characteristics of the random sample more closely match the Census Bureau data than the household scanning panels. We also show that after controlling for demographic differences, participants in the household scanning panels are slightly more price sensitive than participants in the random sample. The two household scanning panels yield similar results in relation to one another, which suggests that the household scanning panels may suffer from sample selection and participation biases. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Stated and Revealed Preferences for Organic and Cloned Milk: Combining Choice Experiment and Scanner Data

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recent announcement that milk from cloned cows is as safe to drink as that from conventionally bred cows prompted interest among farmers, food retailers, and regulators in the market impacts of the introduction of milk from clones. Because milk from cloned animals is not currently labeled in the market, we utilized a stated preference experiment to determine consumer preferences for the attribute, but also sought to determine whether the survey-based choices were consistent with people's revealed preferences given by scanner data. Our analysis indicates that a pooled model combining stated and revealed preference data exhibits overall better out-of-sample prediction performance than either data set used alone. Results from the pooled model indicate that consumers are willing to pay large premiums to avoid milk from cloned cows--an amount that is over three times that for organic or rBST-free milk. The results are used to calculate the value of a mandatory labeling program. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.