Voice restoration following total laryngectomy by tracheoesophageal prosthesis: Effect on patients' quality of life and voice handicap in Jordan

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Little has been reported about the impact of tracheoesophageal (TE) speech on individuals in the Middle East where the procedure has been gaining in popularity. After total laryngectomy, individuals in Europe and North America have rated their quality of life as being lower than non-laryngectomized individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in quality of life and degree of voice handicap reported by laryngectomized speakers from Jordan before and after establishment of TE speech.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twelve male Jordanian laryngectomees completed the University of Michigan Head & Neck Quality of Life instrument and the Voice Handicap Index pre- and post-TE puncture.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All subjects showed significant improvements in their quality of life following successful prosthetic voice restoration. In addition, voice handicap scores were significantly reduced from pre- to post-TE puncture.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Tracheoesophageal speech significantly improved the quality of life and limited the voice handicap imposed by total laryngectomy. This method of voice restoration has been used for a number of years in other countries and now appears to be a viable alternative within Jordan.</p

Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Background PRO-CTCAE is a library of items that measure cancer treatment-related symptomatic adverse events (NCI Contracts: HHSN261201000043C and HHSN 261201000063C). The objective of this study is to examine the equivalence and acceptability of the three data collection modes (Web-enabled touchscreen tablet computer, Interactive voice response system [IVRS], and paper) available within the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) measurement system. Methods Participants (n = 112; median age 56.5; 24 % high school or less) receiving treatment for cancer at seven US sites completed 28 PRO-CTCAE items (scoring range 0–4) by three modes (order randomized) at a single study visit. Subjects completed one page (approx. 15 items) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 between each mode as a distractor. Item scores by mode were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC); differences in scores within the 3-mode crossover design were evaluated with mixed-effects models. Difficulties with each mode experienced by participants were also assessed. Results 103 (92 %) completed questionnaires by all three modes. The median ICC comparing tablet vs IVRS was 0.78 (range 0.55–0.90); tablet vs paper: 0.81 (0.62–0.96); IVRS vs paper: 0.78 (0.60–0.91); 89 % of ICCs were ≥0.70. Item-level mean differences by mode were small (medians [ranges] for tablet vs. IVRS = −0.04 [−0.16–0.22]; tablet vs paper = −0.02 [−0.11–0.14]; IVRS vs paper = 0.02 [−0.07–0.19]), and 57/81 (70 %) items had bootstrapped 95 % CI around the effect sizes within +/−0.20. The median time to complete the questionnaire by tablet was 3.4 min; IVRS: 5.8; paper: 4.0. The proportion of participants by mode who reported “no problems” responding to the questionnaire was 86 % tablet, 72 % IVRS, and 98 % paper. Conclusions Mode equivalence of items was moderate to high, and comparable to test-retest reliability (median ICC = 0.80). Each mode was acceptable to a majority of respondents. Although the study was powered to detect moderate or larger discrepancies between modes, the observed ICCs and very small mean differences between modes provide evidence to support study designs that are responsive to patient or investigator preference for mode of administration, and justify comparison of results and pooled analyses across studies that employ different PRO-CTCAE modes of administration. Trial registration NCT Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT0215863

The Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment: Exploring Fundamental Symmetries of the Universe

The preponderance of matter over antimatter in the early Universe, the dynamics of the supernova bursts that produced the heavy elements necessary for life and whether protons eventually decay --- these mysteries at the forefront of particle physics and astrophysics are key to understanding the early evolution of our Universe, its current state and its eventual fate. The Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) represents an extensively developed plan for a world-class experiment dedicated to addressing these questions. LBNE is conceived around three central components: (1) a new, high-intensity neutrino source generated from a megawatt-class proton accelerator at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, (2) a near neutrino detector just downstream of the source, and (3) a massive liquid argon time-projection chamber deployed as a far detector deep underground at the Sanford Underground Research Facility. This facility, located at the site of the former Homestake Mine in Lead, South Dakota, is approximately 1,300 km from the neutrino source at Fermilab -- a distance (baseline) that delivers optimal sensitivity to neutrino charge-parity symmetry violation and mass ordering effects. This ambitious yet cost-effective design incorporates scalability and flexibility and can accommodate a variety of upgrades and contributions. With its exceptional combination of experimental configuration, technical capabilities, and potential for transformative discoveries, LBNE promises to be a vital facility for the field of particle physics worldwide, providing physicists from around the globe with opportunities to collaborate in a twenty to thirty year program of exciting science. In this document we provide a comprehensive overview of LBNE's scientific objectives, its place in the landscape of neutrino physics worldwide, the technologies it will incorporate and the capabilities it will possess.Comment: Major update of previous version. This is the reference document for LBNE science program and current status. Chapters 1, 3, and 9 provide a comprehensive overview of LBNE's scientific objectives, its place in the landscape of neutrino physics worldwide, the technologies it will incorporate and the capabilities it will possess. 288 pages, 116 figure

Role of maximum phonation time in predicting voice outcome in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis undergoing medialization thyroplasty

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis may result in weak, breathy, and hoarse vocal quality due to glottal incompetence from incomplete glottal closure. The primary goal of surgical intervention is to provide medialization to the involved, paralytic vocal fold allowing its mobile counterpart to make contact during phonation thus improving vocal quality. Medialization thyroplasty, or thyroplasty type I, is one such procedure that was designed to improve glottal closure by inserting a silastic block medial to the paralyzed vocal fold. Currently, there are no standard objective means of assessing changes in glottal competence during medialization thyroplasty. Objective assessment of intra-operative changes in glottal closure that correlate with vocal function would be expected to improve voice outcome.Maximum phonation time (MPT) is an objective measure of vocal function that has been demonstrated to relate to the degree of glottal closure and is sensitive to pre- vs. post-operative medialization thyroplasty results. Normative data on MPT is available with subjects in a standing or seated position. However, medialization thyroplasty is typically performed with the patient in the supine position under conscious sedation or light intravenous anesthesia. Information on the effects of postural changes and/or anesthesia on the ability to maximally sustain sound is not known.The purposes of this investigation were to study the effects of postural positions (supine vs. seated) and anesthesia (light intravenous sedation vs. none) on the measure of MPT. Additionally, the ability of the intra-operative MPT measure to predict the one-month post-surgical value was assessed.Twenty individuals with unilateral vocal fold paralysis undergoing medialization thyroplasty served as subjects in this study. Results indicated that MPT was significantly affected by body position as values were lower in the supine vs. seated position. Secondly, conscious sedation resulted in a trend toward lower MPT values that were not statistically significant. Finally, the intra-operative measure of MPT, while slightly lower than the one-month post-surgical value, was predictive of the outcome. Further research is recommended to determine the critical value of improvement needed in MPT to predict a satisfactory outcome in terms of voice quality and patient satisfaction

“Compensatory falsetto”: Effects on vocal quality

The term “compensatory falsetto”, for the purpose of this investigation, refers to the development of an abnormally high-pitched voice in the presence of laryngeal pathology where more socially acceptable lower pitched voice production is possible. The purpose of this investigation was to compare laryngeal compensations and their effects on objective measures of vocal function during production of compensatory falsetto voice. Eighteen patients with abnormally high-pitched voice in the presence of underlying laryngeal pathology were evaluated in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Miami School of Medicine from January 1988 through December 1992 and were diagnosed with “compensatory falsetto”. Vocal fold paralysis (n = 11) was the most common laryngeal pathology. Vibratory characteristics were evaluated through videostrobolaryngoscopic examination. Acoustic and aerodynamic parameters assessed included fundamental frequency, jitter rate, harmonic-to-noise ratio, glottal air flow, and maximum phonation time. Production of a higher-pitched voice appeared to improve glottic closure and decrease the amount of air loss during phonation. A corresponding increase in maximum phonation time and improvement in acoustic characteristics of jitter and harmonic-to-noise ratio was also observed

Outpatient transoral laser vaporization of anterior glottic webs and keel placement: Risks of airway compromise

Management of acquired anterior glottic webs involves resection of the web with reconstitution of a linear vocal fold edge and anterior commissure. Traditional procedures such as transcervical midline thyrotomy (with tracheostomy) and keel placement have been used for patients with extensive scar formation and airway compromise. However, in selected patients with more limited scarring and minimal-to-no airway compromise, a transoral endoscopic approach may be a viable option. In three patients, transoral laser vaporization followed by transoral keel placement and outpatient removal resulted in a vocal quality that perceptually improved without any evidence of respiratory compromise postoperatively

Reconstruction of the stenotic hypopharynx and cervical esophagus without total laryngectomy

Reconstruction for severe stenosis of the hypopharynx, laryngeal inlet, and/or cervical esophagus is a challenging problem for the surgeon and his patient who want to avoid total laryngectomy. We reviewed the case records of eight patients and the relevant published literature in an effort to define the requirements for success and the causes of failure. A variety of surgical techniques were used. Seven of 8 patients eat a normal or near normal diet. Two of 4 patients, who sustained laryngeal damage at the time of initial injury, required total laryngectomy because of persistent aspiration. The 2 remaining patients and the 4 patients, who did not sustain laryngeal damage at the time of injury, speak with a good voice. Total laryngectomy should be reserved for those patient who cannot be rehabilitated following optimal reconstruction

Can maximum phonation time predict voice outcome after thyroplasty type I?

Thyroplasty type I, as introduced by Isshiki and colleagues almost 30 years ago, has become the gold standard of improving glottal incompetence caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Intraoperative assessment of the adequacy of glottal closure is subjective and based on the perceptual judgment of vocal quality and degree of improvement in glottal gap size. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether the intraoperative measurement of maximum phonation time (MPT) is an adequate predictor of voice outcome after thyroplasty type I. To assess this possibility, it was necessary to evaluate the effect of body posture (seated vs. supine) and anesthesia (none vs. light sedation) on the measure of MPT. A prospective study of 20 individuals with unilateral vocal fold paralysis was undertaken. Subjects were assessed at three time points: pre-, intra-, and postoperatively across parameters of breathiness rating, glottal gap size, glottal flow rate, and MPT. Results indicated that MPT was significantly lower in the supine versus seated position. In addition, light sedation resulted in a trend toward lower MPT that was not statistically significant. Finally, the intraoperative measurement of MPT, although lower than a 1-month postoperative measurement, was significantly predictive of the outcome. The intraoperative measure of MPT appears to be an adequate predictor of the postoperative outcome