6 research outputs found

    Long-Term Weight Loss with Body Contour Surgery After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is accepted as an evidence-based treatment for morbid obesity. Many patients seek out body contour surgery afterwards to correct acquired deformities. This study seeks to better define the impact of body contour surgery on long-term weight loss. METHODS: This study is a single-center retrospective review of 78 patients who underwent body contouring surgery post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with 221 matched control patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass only. Data was collected for patients at least 7 years post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. RESULTS: Patients who underwent both bariatric surgery and body contour surgery maintained mean long-term weight loss of 58 kg. The matched control group mean weight loss over the same time interval was 42 kg. The difference was statistically and clinically significant (p = 0.005). Change in body mass index, percent total weight loss, and percent excess body mass index loss were all statistically significant between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent body contour surgery better maintained long-term weight reduction in comparison to those who only had gastric bypass. Further understanding of the etiology of this association is important for patients contemplating body contouring surgery

    The effect of oncoplastic reduction on the incidence of post-operative lymphedema in breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomy

    Get PDF
    Purpose: In breast cancer patients with macromastia, breast conservation surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) may be associated with a different complication profile than those without macromastia. Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM) aims to reduce breast volume while excising the tumor bed and its margins. Since breast volume was found to be a risk factor for chronic breast lymphedema, this study was performed to determine the impact of ORM on chronic breast lymphedema as well as other complications compared to BCS without ORM. Material & Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on patients who underwent lumpectomy with RT from 2014 to 2018. Chronic breast lymphedema (CBL) was defined as swelling that persisted \u3e1 year post-RT. Breast volumes (BV) were determined by contoured breast volumes or, if unavailable, estimated by the 95% isodose volumes from the RT treatment planning system. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate patient factors and treatment outcomes in women with BV ≥1300 cc compared to-Evaluate factors associated with ≥1 complication. Identify factors associated with the development of CBL. Results: The total population included 1173 patients: -1122 (95.7%) underwent BCS alone without ORM -51 (4.3%) underwent ORM -733 (62.5%) had a BVcc -440 (37.5%) had BV ≥1300 cc Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that compared to patients with BV \u3c 1300 cc, patients with BV ≥1300 cc had: -Higher BMI (OR=1.200, P\u3c0.001) -Increased risk of CBL (OR=2.127, P=0.024) -Decreased risk of grade 2 radiation dermatitis (OR=0.457, P=0.002) Conclusion: Our data demonstrates that patients with breast volumes ≥1300 cc were two times more likely to develop CBL. Although patients with ORM had an increased risk for surgical site complications, the ORM procedure may have mitigated their risk for CBL. ORM should be considered at the time of BCS in women with macromastia to reduce their future risk of CBL as there is no cure for this disease.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/sarcd2021/1008/thumbnail.jp

    The Effect of Oncoplastic Reduction on The Incidence of Post-Operative Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy

    No full text
    Purpose/Objective(s): In patients with macromastia, breast conservation surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) may be associated with increased radiation exposure and a different complication profile than those without macromastia. The oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM) procedure includes breast reduction at the time of BCS. The purpose of this study is to determine if women with macromastia who undergo ORM have a different complication profile compared to those who undergo BCS followed by RT. Materials/Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on patients who underwent lumpectomy with RT from 2014 to 2017. Chronic breast lymphedema (CBL) was defined as swelling that persisted \u3e1-year post-RT. Breast volumes (BV) were determined by contoured breast volumes or, if unavailable, estimated by the 95% isodose volumes from the RT treatment planning system. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate various patient factors and treatment outcomes in women with BV ≥1300 cc compared to \u3c1300 cc. These same factors were compared in women who underwent ORM vs. BCS. Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with ≥1 complication. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the development of CBL. Results: The total population included 785 patients, of which 28 (3.6%) underwent ORM and 757 (96.4%) underwent BCS. The total population was stratified into two groups, in which 289 (36.8%) patients had BV ≥1300 cc and 496 (63.2%) patients had a BV \u3c1300 cc. Compared to patients with BV\u3c1300 cc, those with BV ≥1300 cc had a higher percentage of African Americans (52.6% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.002), higher median BMI (34.96 vs. 27.87, P\u3c0.001), higher incidence of diabetes (39.8% vs. 27.2%, P\u3c0.001), higher incidence of hypertension (75.4% vs. 63.1%, P\u3c0.001), and higher incidence of CBL (12.5% vs. 4.2%, P\u3c0.001). Compared to BCS patients, ORM patients with BV ≥1300 cc had increased incidence of CBL (36.4% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.035). Logistic regression showed that the incidence of ≥1 complication was associated with BMI, presence of SLNB, and the number of lymph nodes removed in either SLNB or ALND. However, factors such as ORM and BV were not associated with an increased risk of ≥1 complication. Logistic regression demonstrated that having a BV ≥1300 cc was associated with 2.5 times increased odds of CBL compared to those with BV \u3c1300 cc. Even though those who underwent ORM did not change the risk for CBL for the entire cohort, ORM patients with BV ≥1300 had a higher risk of CBL. Ultimately, logistic regression demonstrates that ORM does not increase the risk of CBL when adjusting for BV. Conclusion: In conclusion, axillary surgery contributed most significantly to the incidence of having ≥1 complication. However, BV was associated with an increased risk of CBL, regardless of the presence of ORM. Therefore, women with BV ≥1300 cc should be offered ORM at the time of lumpectomy in order to reduce their future risk of CBL
    corecore