6 research outputs found

    Additional file 1: of Early warning signal for dengue outbreaks and identification of high risk areas for dengue fever in Colombia using climate and non-climate datasets

    No full text
    Supplementary 1.Cross-correlograms of climate datasets and DIP. Supplementary 2. Model specifications. Supplementary 3. Climate factors and DIP over time by department. Supplementary 4. The CRF index and DIP over time by department. Supplementary 5. Identification of high risk areas for dengue fever. Supplementary 6. EWS for 11 departments during the study period. Supplementary 7. EWS for 11 departments in 2015. (ZIP 2317 kb

    Application of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the Croatian Constitutional Court

    No full text
    U radu se analiziraju odluke koje se odnose na upravnu materiju u kojima je odlučivao Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske od 1999. do rujna 2015. Ta je analiza relevantna jer pokazuje u kojoj mjeri javnopravna tijela te Ustavni sud u Republici Hrvatskoj vrednuju Europsku konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda. Drugim riječima, ispituju se modeli primjene Europske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda od Ustavnog suda u upravnim područjima te se pokušava odgovoriti na pitanje može li se govoriti o primjeni Europske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u pravom smislu riječi ili je prisutno tek puko pozivanje na pojedine njezine odredbe bez ulaska u dubinu i prijeko potrebnu analizu prakse ESLJP-a.Implementation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the case law of the Croatian Constitutional Court in the period 1999-2015 is analysed. Several models of implementation are outlined. All respective constitutional court cases are systematised into five categories: a) implementation through direct application of the Convention or its individual provisions, b) implementation through application of the European Court of Human Rights’ case law, c) implementation through application of an individual provision of the Convention and the Court’s case law, d) implementation on the basis of four main criteria, length of the proceedings, work of the competent bodies, applicant’s behaviour, and case complexity, and e) implementation in cases in which only applicants allege violation of the Convention while the Constitutional Court has not explicitly mentioned the Convention in its decision. The coherence of the Croatian Constitutional Court’s case law with the case law of the ECtHR can be best observed in the category of implementation based on four main criteria (d). Almost identical decisions about reasonable length of the proceedings indicate that the Croatian Constitutional Court has harmonized its practice with the European Convention
    corecore