18 research outputs found
Specificity of Binding of Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein to Its Target
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) bind single-stranded
DNA (ssDNA) and participate in all genetic processes involving ssDNA,
such as replication, recombination, and repair. Here we applied atomic
force microscopy to directly image SSB–DNA complexes under
various conditions. We used the hybrid DNA construct methodology in
which the ssDNA segment is conjugated to the DNA duplex. The duplex
part of the construct plays the role of a marker, allowing unambiguous
identification of specific and nonspecific SSB–DNA complexes.
We designed hybrid DNA substrates with 5′- and 3′-ssDNA
termini to clarify the role of ssDNA polarity on SSB loading. The
hybrid substrates, in which two duplexes are connected with ssDNA,
were the models for gapped DNA substrates. We demonstrated that <i>Escherichia coli</i> SSB binds to ssDNA ends and internal ssDNA
regions with the same efficiency. However, the specific recognition
by ssDNA requires the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations or a high
ionic strength. In the absence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations and under
low-salt conditions, the protein is capable of binding DNA duplexes.
In addition, the number of interprotein interactions increases, resulting
in the formation of clusters on double-stranded DNA. This finding
suggests that the protein adopts different conformations depending
on ionic strength, and specific recognition of ssDNA by SSB requires
a high ionic strength or the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations
Specificity of Binding of Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein to Its Target
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) bind single-stranded
DNA (ssDNA) and participate in all genetic processes involving ssDNA,
such as replication, recombination, and repair. Here we applied atomic
force microscopy to directly image SSB–DNA complexes under
various conditions. We used the hybrid DNA construct methodology in
which the ssDNA segment is conjugated to the DNA duplex. The duplex
part of the construct plays the role of a marker, allowing unambiguous
identification of specific and nonspecific SSB–DNA complexes.
We designed hybrid DNA substrates with 5′- and 3′-ssDNA
termini to clarify the role of ssDNA polarity on SSB loading. The
hybrid substrates, in which two duplexes are connected with ssDNA,
were the models for gapped DNA substrates. We demonstrated that <i>Escherichia coli</i> SSB binds to ssDNA ends and internal ssDNA
regions with the same efficiency. However, the specific recognition
by ssDNA requires the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations or a high
ionic strength. In the absence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations and under
low-salt conditions, the protein is capable of binding DNA duplexes.
In addition, the number of interprotein interactions increases, resulting
in the formation of clusters on double-stranded DNA. This finding
suggests that the protein adopts different conformations depending
on ionic strength, and specific recognition of ssDNA by SSB requires
a high ionic strength or the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations
Specificity of Binding of Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein to Its Target
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) bind single-stranded
DNA (ssDNA) and participate in all genetic processes involving ssDNA,
such as replication, recombination, and repair. Here we applied atomic
force microscopy to directly image SSB–DNA complexes under
various conditions. We used the hybrid DNA construct methodology in
which the ssDNA segment is conjugated to the DNA duplex. The duplex
part of the construct plays the role of a marker, allowing unambiguous
identification of specific and nonspecific SSB–DNA complexes.
We designed hybrid DNA substrates with 5′- and 3′-ssDNA
termini to clarify the role of ssDNA polarity on SSB loading. The
hybrid substrates, in which two duplexes are connected with ssDNA,
were the models for gapped DNA substrates. We demonstrated that <i>Escherichia coli</i> SSB binds to ssDNA ends and internal ssDNA
regions with the same efficiency. However, the specific recognition
by ssDNA requires the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations or a high
ionic strength. In the absence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations and under
low-salt conditions, the protein is capable of binding DNA duplexes.
In addition, the number of interprotein interactions increases, resulting
in the formation of clusters on double-stranded DNA. This finding
suggests that the protein adopts different conformations depending
on ionic strength, and specific recognition of ssDNA by SSB requires
a high ionic strength or the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> cations
Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Studies of APOBEC3A–Single-Stranded DNA Complexes
APOBEC3A
(A3A) inhibits the replication of a range of viruses and
transposons and might also play a role in carcinogenesis. It is a
single-domain deaminase enzyme that interacts with single-stranded
DNA (ssDNA) and converts cytidines to uridines within specific trinucleotide
contexts. Although there is abundant information that describes the
potential biological activities of A3A, the interplay between binding
ssDNA and sequence-specific deaminase activity remains controversial.
Using a single-molecule atomic force microscopy spectroscopy approach
developed by Shlyakhtenko et al. [(2015) <i>Sci. Rep. 5</i>, 15648], we determine the stability of A3A in complex with different
ssDNA sequences. We found that the strength of the complex is sequence-dependent,
with more stable complexes formed with deaminase-specific sequences.
A correlation between the deaminase activity of A3A and the complex
strength was identified. The ssDNA binding properties of A3A and those
for A3G are also compared and discussed
AFM images of A3A in complex with gap-DNA.
<p>A3A monomer and dimer complexes are labeled 1 and 2, respectively. Bar size, 100</p
Gallery of AFM images of A3A<sub>E72A</sub> complexed with dsDNA (A) or ssDNA (B) regions of the gap-DNA substrate.
<p>Bar size, 30</p
Histograms for protein volume measurements for free A3Gctd (A) and A3A (B).
<p>Number of complexes analyzed were N = 173 and 148 for histograms (A) and (B), respectively. The mean volume values for monomers (1-mers; 28±12 nm<sup>3</sup>) and dimers (2-mers; 56±22 nm<sup>3</sup>) are indicated with arrows. See similar numbers for A3A in Fig. 3.</p
AFM images of A3A<sub>E72A</sub> complexed with gap-DNA substrate.
<p>Specific complexes with A3A<sub>E72A</sub> dimers and trimers are labeled 2 and 3, respectively. Bar size, 100 nm.</p
Gallery of AFM images of A3A complexed with ssDNA (A) or dsDNA (B) regions of the gap-DNA substrate.
<p>Bar size, 30</p
Results of the volume measurements of A3A complexed with gap-DNA (A) alone (B).
<p>Numbers of complexes analyzed are N = 118 for (A) and N = 148 for (B). The mean volume values (± SD) for monomers (1-mers; 33±16 nm<sup>3</sup>) and dimers (2-mers; 66±26 nm<sup>3</sup>) are indicated with arrows.</p