12 research outputs found

    Percentage of residues that are correctly aligned in pairwise sequence alignments from the BAliBASE reference set 7, sorted by sequence identity of the protein families.

    No full text
    <p>Mean = mean percentage of correctly-aligned residues over averages for eight families. <sup>a</sup>Number of pair-wise alignments. <sup>b</sup>Mean (±standard deviation) of the percentage sequence identity between pairs of alignments in each family.</p

    Average shift error in pairwise alignments of the BAliBASE reference set 7.

    No full text
    <p>Families are sorted by the average sequence identity (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057731#pone-0057731-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a>). Mean = mean over averages for eight families.</p

    Average shift error in pairwise alignments assigned to the same subgroup within the BAliBASE reference set 7.

    No full text
    <p>Families are sorted by the average sequence identity (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057731#pone-0057731-t005" target="_blank">Table 5</a>). Mean = mean over averages for eight families.</p

    Accuracy of alignments generated using different methods on the HOMEP2 data set.

    No full text
    <p>Results are sorted according to the level of sequence similarity of the sequence pair, in percentage identity. The number of pairwise alignments is shown in parentheses. The percentage of correctly aligned residues (% correct) and average shift error size (shift) with respect to the structure-based reference alignments (see Methods) are reported. *Values marked with an asterisk in this and all other tables are not significantly different from those of AlignMePST (p-value >0.05) based on a pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank test. All other values are significantly different from those of AlignMePST. Entries in bold in this table, and all subsequent tables, indicate the highest or best scores in that column, including all values that are not significantly different from the best scores.</p

    Alignment of Helical Membrane Protein Sequences Using AlignMe

    No full text
    <div><p>Few sequence alignment methods have been designed specifically for integral membrane proteins, even though these important proteins have distinct evolutionary and structural properties that might affect their alignments. Existing approaches typically consider membrane-related information either by using membrane-specific substitution matrices or by assigning distinct penalties for gap creation in transmembrane and non-transmembrane regions. Here, we ask whether favoring matching of predicted transmembrane segments within a standard dynamic programming algorithm can improve the accuracy of pairwise membrane protein sequence alignments. We tested various strategies using a specifically designed program called AlignMe. An updated set of homologous membrane protein structures, called HOMEP2, was used as a reference for optimizing the gap penalties. The best of the membrane-protein optimized approaches were then tested on an independent reference set of membrane protein sequence alignments from the BAliBASE collection. When secondary structure (S) matching was combined with evolutionary information (using a position-specific substitution matrix (P)), in an approach we called AlignMePS, the resultant pairwise alignments were typically among the most accurate over a broad range of sequence similarities when compared to available methods. Matching transmembrane predictions (T), in addition to evolutionary information, and secondary-structure predictions, in an approach called AlignMePST, generally reduces the accuracy of the alignments of closely-related proteins in the BAliBASE set relative to AlignMePS, but may be useful in cases of extremely distantly related proteins for which sequence information is less informative. The open source AlignMe code is available at <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/alignme/" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/projects/alignme/</a>, and at <a href="http://www.forrestlab.org" target="_blank">http://www.forrestlab.org</a>, along with an online server and the HOMEP2 data set.</p> </div

    Comparison of alignment accuracy when using multiple input descriptors in AlignMe.

    No full text
    <p>Combinations included: (a) PSSMs with hydrophobicity descriptors or transmembrane predictions; (b) secondary structure prediction with PSSMs or transmembrane predictions; or (c) PSSMs, PSIPRED and OCTOPUS together. The scores obtained using PSSMs or PSIPRED alone are indicated with gray lines for reference. Gap penalties were assigned differently to sequence segments above or below a threshold (black bars), and the threshold was defined using the inputs marked by *. For example, in the PSIPRED* & OCTOPUS combination, the threshold was assigned using PSIPRED. See legend for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057731#pone-0057731-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a> for further details.</p

    Average shift error in pairwise alignments assigned to different subgroups within the BAliBASE reference set 7.

    No full text
    <p>Families are sorted by the average sequence identity (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0057731#pone-0057731-t006" target="_blank">Table 6</a>). Mean = mean over averages for eight families.</p
    corecore