Dataset related to article "Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform"

<p>This record contains raw data related to article "Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform"</p><p>Abstract</p><p>Background: Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A).</p><p>Methods: Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p>Results: A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B.</p><p>Conclusions: Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A.</p><p> </p><p>Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.</p><p> </p&gt

Clinical and Imaging Outcomes After Trigeminal Schwannoma Radiosurgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESAn international, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and tumor control rates after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for trigeminal schwannoma. METHODSPatient data (N = 309) were collected from 14 international radiosurgery centers. The median patient age was 50 years (range 11-87 years). Sixty patients (19%) had prior resections. Abnormal facial sensation was the commonest complaint (49%). The anatomic locations were root (N = 40), ganglion (N = 141), or dumbbell type (N = 128). The median tumor volume was 4 cc (range, 0.2-30.1 cc), and median margin dose was 13 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy). Factors associated with tumor control, symptom improvement, and adverse radiation events were assessed. RESULTSThe median and mean time to last follow-up was 49 and 65 months (range 6-242 months). Greater than 5-year follow-up was available for 139 patients (45%), and 50 patients (16%) had longer than 10-year follow-up. The overall tumor control rate was 94.5%. Tumors regressed in 146 patients (47.2%), remained unchanged in 128 patients (41.4%), and stabilized after initial expansion in 20 patients (6.5%). Progression-free survival rates at 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years were 91%, 86%, and 80 %. Smaller tumor volume (less than 8 cc) was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (P = .02). Seventeen patients with sustained growth underwent further intervention at a median of 27 months (3-144 months). Symptom improvement was noted in 140 patients (45%) at a median of 7 months. In multivariate analysis primary, SRS (P = .003) and smaller tumor volume (P = .01) were associated with better symptom improvement. Adverse radiation events were documented in 29 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONSRS was associated with long-term freedom (10 year) from additional management in 80% of patients. SRS proved to be a valuable salvage option after resection. When used as a primary management for smaller volume tumors, both clinical improvement and prevention of new deficits were optimized