La remise en cause de l’autonomie du champ médiatique par le champ maraboutique au Sénégal

Prenant appui sur la théorie générale des champs de Pierre Bourdieu, cette étude montre comment l’autonomie médiatique et politique est nuancée, relativisée, voire remise en cause par l’omniprésence du pouvoir maraboutique, en particulier au Sénégal. Les contours de la situation sénégalaise y sont évoqués avec la force du pouvoir maraboutique, ses conséquences sur le comportement des acteurs sociaux et la règle qu’il impose au champ médiatique (autocensure journalistique), malgré les prémisses d’un changement dans le comportement des médias.Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s general field theory, this study shows that marabout power is able to relativize or even to challenge the mediatic and politic autonomy, particularly in Senegal. The outline of Senegalese situation is drawn based on the « strength » of marabout power, its consequences on social actors’behavior and the rule that it is imposing on the mediatic field (journalistic self censorship), although the attitude of medias starts to change

Questions épistémologiques à propos d’une « interdiscipline »

Communication internationale ou internationalisation de la communication ? À quelque bout qu’on prend la question, la pertinence de l’existence de la communication internationale comme sous-discipline, discipline ou matière se pose dans l’univers global des sciences sociales. Si l’on reconnaît une discipline scientifique à travers les diplômes qui sanctionnent un cursus académique prédéfini, par l’ampleur des travaux qui portent le sceau de la matière désignée, par le nombre de chercheurs revendiquant une telle spécialité ou reconnus comme tels, par le nombre de centres de recherche abritant lesdits spécialistes, il est démontré que la pertinence de l’enseignement et de la recherche en communication internationale ne fait pas l’objet d’un doute. Ceci explique d’ailleurs que ce débat, s’il a existé un moment, n’est plus un centre d’intérêt réel. Ce qui l’est par contre, c’est le carrefour interdisciplinaire que constitue cette sous-discipline « ballotée » entre sa source de rattachement ombilical (la communication), les relations internationales qu’elle « chevauche » sans risque d’entremêlement, et la science sociale qui englobe l’ensemble des recherches touchant la société lato sensu et qu’elle ne peut ignorer. Comment la communication internationale peut revendiquer une place de choix dans l’univers global des sciences sociales ? Dans quelle mesure et jusqu’à quel point les objets qu’elle aborde, les enjeux sociétaux qu’elle adresse interpellent-ils toutes les disciplines des sciences sociales ? Comment démontrer sans effort son rattachement à la trajectoire historique que suivent les sciences sociales ? C’est dans cette disposition d’esprit que s’enclenche cette réflexion quasi heuristique qui porte sur des questions d’épistémologie autour d’une « indiscipline » ou d’une « interdiscipline » nommée communication internationale.International communication or internationalization of communication? At some point, the relevance of the existence of international communication as a sub-discipline, discipline or subject matter arises in the global universe of the social sciences. If a scientific discipline is recognized through the diplomas awarded by a predefined academic curriculum, by the extent of the work that bears the seal of the subject, by the number of researchers claiming such a specialty or recognized as such, Number of research centers in which these specialists are located, it is demonstrated that there is no doubt as to the relevance of teaching and research in international communication. This explains why this debate, if it existed for a moment, is no longer a real center of interest. What is the interdisciplinary crossroads of this sub-discipline "tumbled" between its source of umbilical attachment (communication), the international relations it "overlaps" without risk of entanglement, and The social science which encompasses all research concerning society lato sensu and which it can not ignore. How can international communication claim a prominent place in the global universe of the social sciences? To what extent and to what extent are the social issues addressed by it addressed by all the disciplines of the social sciences? How can one demonstrate without effort its attachment to the historical trajectory followed by the social sciences ? It is in this perspective that this quasi-heuristic analysis begins which concerns epistemological questions around an "indiscipline" or an "interdiscipline" called international communication.Comunicação internacional ou comunicação internacional? Em qualquer maneira que você toma a questão, a relevância da existência de comunicação internacional como uma sub-disciplina, disciplina ou assunto surge no universo total de ciências sociais. Se uma disciplina científica é reconhecida pelo diplomas premiado com um curso pré-acadêmica, pela quantidade de trabalho que carregam o selo do material designado, o número de pesquisadores que afirmam tais especialidade ou reconhecido como tal pela número de centros de pesquisa que abrigam os chamados peritos, há evidências de que a relevância do ensino e da pesquisa em comunicação internacional não está sujeita à dúvida. Isto explica também que este debate, se existisse algum tempo, não é, mais um centro de interesse real. O que é os contras é a encruzilhada interdisciplinares que constituem este sub-disciplina "jogou" entre a sua fonte de ligação umbilical (comunicação), relações internacionais, ela "passeios" sem risco de enrolamento e ciência social que engloba todas as pesquisas envolvendo a sociedade em sentido amplo e que não podemos ignorar. Como a comunicação internacional pode reivindicar um lugar no universo total de ciências sociais? Como e em que medida os objetos que abrange, tratar de questões sociais que desafiam todas as disciplinas das ciências sociais? Como facilmente demonstrar o seu apego à trajetória histórica que siga as ciências sociais? É neste estado de espírito que se encaixa esta reflexão heurística quase que aborda questões de epistemologia em torno de uma "indiscipline" ou "interdiscipline" nomeado comunicação internacional

Paradigme de l’interdisciplinarité, communication et développement international

This text looks to the construction of a new and innovative research problem in order to bridge the critical perspectives of two different disciplines, one development oriented and the other communicational. The goal is to demonstrate that while the critical may be in decline in the field of communication due to a tendency to cloister itself within debate between schools (empirical, critical, Cultural Studies), the field of development is undergoing an important period of paradigmatic questioning. This is an opportunity to “reinvent” the critical, constructing the general research problem upon the theme of digital solidarity and overlapping two disciplines : development and international development communication. This is a plea for interdisciplinarity that depends crucially on the future of critical theory, even at the risk of falling back into the quagmire of ideology

Pluralisme de l'information et groupes multimédias privés au Sénégal (essai d'approche socio-politique)

BORDEAUX3-BU Lettres-Pessac (335222103) / SudocSudocFranceF