The Importance of Feasibility Assessment in the Design of ctDNA Guided Trials – Results From the OPTIPAL II Study

Introduction: Both quantitative and molecular changes in ctDNA can hold important information when treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its clinical utility is yet to be established. Before conducting a large-scale randomized trial, it is essential to test feasibility. This study investigates whether ctDNA is feasible for detecting patients who will benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) response. Materials and methods: Patients with mCRC, who were considered for systemic palliative treatment and were eligible for ctDNA analysis. Mutational testing on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was done by ddPCR. ctDNA response from baseline to the third treatment cycle was evaluated in patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline. ctDNA maximum response was defined as undetectable ctDNA at the third treatment cycle, ctDNA partial response as any decrease in the ctDNA level, and ctDNA progression as any increase in the ctDNA level. Results: Forty-nine patients were included. The time to test results for mutational testing on cfDNA was significantly shorter than on tumor tissue (p &lt; .001). Progression-free survival were 11.2 months (reference group), 7.5 months (HR = 10.7, p= .02), and 4.6 months (HR = 11.4, p= .02) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Overall survival was 31.2 months (reference group), 15.2 months (HR = 4.1, p= .03), and 9.0 months (HR = 2.6, p= .03) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Conclusion: Pretreatment mutational testing on cfDNA in daily clinic is feasible and can be applied in randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility of ctDNA. Early dynamics in ctDNA during systemic treatment hold prognostic value.</p

Circulating DNA and frequency of colorectal cancer brain metastases in a presumed high-risk group

Abstract This explorative prospective observational pilot study investigated if suggested risk factors, rectal cancer and lung metastases, could add to a relevant detection rate of asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Secondary, prognostic biological aspects were investigated by translational analysis of plasma samples. The study enrolled patients with rectal cancer and lung metastases. At inclusion, patients underwent a standard MRI scan of the brain. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) level was measured by a direct fluorescence assay (DFA), and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by ddPCR. BM was detected in one of twenty-nine included patients. Patients had higher cfDNA levels than healthy subjects (p < 0.01). Patients with the primary tumor in situ had higher cfDNA levels than those with resected primary tumor (p < 0.01). Patients with liver involvement had higher cfDNA levels (p = 0.12) and circulating tumor DNA levels (p = 0.01) than those without liver involvement. In conclusion, the modest incidence of BM does not justify routine MRI of the brain in this selected population. cfDNA by DFA could be a valuable tool when planning treatment and follow-up for CRC patients. Future studies should focus on identifying further characteristics and biomarkers associated with a high risk of BM, enhancing the possibility for early intervention

Reporting on circulating tumor DNA monitoring in metastatic cancer—From clinical validity to clinical utility

This commentary attempts to discuss the required standardization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses and thereby improve the clinical validity of ctDNA monitoring in the metastatic setting of solid tumors

ctDNA-guided adjuvant treatment after radical-intent treatment of metastatic spread from colorectal cancer—the first interim results from the OPTIMISE study

Patients with detectable ctDNA after radical-intent treatment of metastatic spread from colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a very high risk of recurrence, which may be prevented with intensified adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTh). In the OPTIMISE study, we investigate ctDNA-guided aCTh after radical-intent treatment of mCRC. Here we present results from the preplanned interim analysis. The study is an open-label 1:1 randomized clinical trial comparing ctDNA-guided aCTh against standard of care (SOC), with a run-in phase investigating feasibility measures. Key inclusion criteria; radical-intent treatment for mCRC and clinically eligible for triple-agent chemotherapy. Patients underwent a PET-CT scan before randomization. ctDNA analyses of plasma samples were done by ddPCR, detecting CRC-specific mutations and methylation of the NPY gene. In the ctDNA-guided arm, ctDNA positivity led to an escalation strategy with triple-agent chemotherapy, and conversely ctDNA negativity led to a de-escalation strategy by shared-decision making. Patients randomized to the standard arm were treated according to SOC. Feasibility measures for the run-in phase were; the inclusion of 30 patients over 12 months in two Danish hospitals, compliance with randomization >80%, rate of PET-CT-positive findings 80%. Thirty-two patients were included. The rate of PET-CT-positive cases was 22% (n = 7/32). Ninety-seven percent of the patients were randomized. Fourteen patients were randomly assigned to SOC and sixteen to ctDNA-guided adjuvant treatment and follow-up. All analyses of baseline plasma samples in the ctDNA-guided arm passed the quality control, and 19% were ctDNA positive. The median time to result was three working days. All ctDNA-positive patients were eligible for triple-agent chemotherapy. The study was proven to be feasible and continues in the planned large-scale phase II trial. Results from the OPTIMISE study will potentially optimize the adjuvant treatment of patients undergoing radical-intent treatment of mCRC, thereby improving survival and reducing chemotherapy-related toxicity.</p