Self-reported impulsivity and inhibitory control in problem gamblers

Impulsivity is considered a core feature of problem gambling, however, self-reported impulsivity and inhibitory control may reflect disparate constructs. We examined self-reported impulsivity and inhibitory control in 39 treatment-seeking problem gamblers and 41 matched controls using a range of self-report questionnaires and laboratory inhibitory control tasks. We also investigated differences between treatment-seeking problem gamblers who prefer strategic (e.g., sports-betting) and non-strategic (e.g., electronic gaming machines) gambling activities. Treatment-seeking problem gamblers demonstrated elevated self-reported impulsivity, more go errors on the Stop Signal Task and a lower gap score on the Random Number Generation task than matched controls. However, overall we did not find strong evidence that treatment-seeking problem gamblers are more impulsive on laboratory inhibitory control measures. Furthermore, strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers did not differ from their respective controls on either self-reported impulsivity questionnaires or laboratory inhibitory control measures. Contrary to expectations, our results suggest that inhibitory dyscontrol may not be a key component for some treatment-seeking problem gamblers

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of pathological and problem gambling (protocol)

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To evaluate evidence for the efficacy and durability of any form of pharmacological treatment for pathological and problem gambling. To evaluate treatment options for pathological and problem gambling to inform evidence based clinical practice. To assess the methodological features and risk of bias in existing research to inform the methodological and conceptual development of future research in the field