Neonatal outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome not treated with fetoscopic laser surgery

The aim of this study was to describe the neonatal management and outcome in monochorionic twins with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) not treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. All consecutive live-born neonates with TTTS managed at our center between 2002 and 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Neonatal outcome was assessed in 44 twin pairs with TTTS not treated with laser (nonlaser group) compared to a control group of 88 twin pairs with TTTS successfully treated with laser (laser group), matched for gestational age at birth. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome, a composite outcome including neonatal mortality or severe neonatal morbidity. The incidence of adverse neonatal outcome in the nonlaser group and laser group was 30% (26/88) and 11% (19/176), respectively (relative risk = 3.46, 95% CI [1.79, 6.71]). In the nonlaser group, 11% had necrotizing enterocolitis (vs. 2% in the laser group) and 24% had hypotension (vs. 10% in the laser group). Recipients in the nonlaser group had, compared to recipients in the laser group, significantly more severe cerebral injury (18% vs. 5%) and more polycythemia at birth (21% vs. 1%). Donors in the nonlaser group had, compared to donors in the laser group, more severe growth restriction (71% vs 42%), renal failure (11% vs 1%), and anemia at birth (25% vs. 7%). Thus, the risk for neonatal mortality and/or severe morbidity is three-fold higher in TTTS not treated with laser than in TTTS treated with laser, which highlights the fact that these neonates with TTTS are very sick at birth, requiring accurate and prompt intensive treatment.Research into fetal development and medicin

Large variations between NICU nurses in predicting nasogastric tube insertion length in a mannequin study

Aim: To evaluate the inter-and intraindividual variation of predicted nasogastric tube insertion lengths by nurses working in two neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands, using a mannequin model. Methods: A total of 110 nurses (55 nurses from Center A and 55 from Center B) were asked to predict the nasogastric tube insertion length on a neonatal mannequin. We evaluated the length and prediction method used by the nurses. We also estimated the number of tubes that would have correctly been placed in the stomach of a neonate according to the seize of the mannequin.Results: The mean predicted insertion length of the nasogastric tube was 30.0 cm with an inter -individual variation of 12 cm (range 24-36 cm). The mean intraindividual variation was 0.75 cm. The two centers used two different prediction methods in their local guidelines, but overall at least 6 different methods were used by the nurses. We estimated that 77% (85/110) of the tubes would have ended in the body of the mannequins stomach, while 10% (11/110) would have ended in the esophagus and 13% (14/110) would have ended against the stomach lining or in the duodenum.Conclusion: Nurses in two neonatal intensive care units used many different methods which lead to a large interindividual variation in predicted insertion lengths of the nasogastric tubes. Regular evaluations using this mannequin model could lead to more uniformity and reduce the risk of tube misplacement in neonates.Developmen

Immunoglobulin for alloimmune hemolytic disease in neonates

Background: Exchange transfusion and phototherapy have traditionally been used to treat jaundice and avoid the associated neurological complications. Because of the risks and burdens of exchange transfusion, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been suggested as an alternative therapy for alloimmune hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) to reduce the need for exchange transfusion. Objectives: To assess the effect and complications of IVIg in newborn infants with alloimmune HDN on the need for and number of exchange transfusions. Search methods: We performed electronic searches of CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Academic Search Premier, and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov and controlled-trials.com in May 2017. We also searched reference lists of included and excluded trials and relevant reviews for further relevant studies. Selection criteria: We considered all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of IVIg in the treatment of alloimmune HDN. Trials must have used predefined criteria for the use of IVIg and exchange transfusion therapy to be included. Data collection and analysis: We used the standard methods of Cochrane and its Neonatal Review Group. We assessed studies for inclusion and two review authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We discussed any differences of opinion to reach consensus. We contacted investigators for additional or missing information. We calculated risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) for categorical outcomes. We calculated mean difference (MD) for continuous variables. We used GRADE criteria to assess the risk of bias for major outcomes and to summarize the level of evidence. Main results: Nine studies with 658 infants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Term and preterm infants with Rh or ABO (or both) incompatibility were included. The use of exchange transfusion decreased significantly in the immunoglobulin treated group (typical RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.49; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.16; NNTB 5). The mean number of exchange transfusions per infant was also significantly lower in the immunoglobulin treated group (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.17). However, sensitivity analysis by risk of bias showed that in the only two studies in which the treatment was masked by use of a placebo and outcome assessment was blinded, the results differed; there was no difference in the need for exchange transfusions (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.98) or number of exchange transfusions (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.10). Two studies assessed long-term outcomes and found no cases of kernicterus, deafness or cerebral palsy. Authors' conclusions: Although overall results show a significant reduction in the need for exchange transfusion in infants treated with IVIg, the applicability of the results is limited because of low to very low quality of evidence. Furthermore, the two studies at lowest risk of bias show no benefit of IVIg in reducing the need for and number of exchange transfusions. Based on these results, we have insufficient confidence in the effect estimate for benefit of IVIg to make even a weak recommendation for the use of IVIg for the treatment of alloimmune HDN. Further studies are needed before the use of IVIg for the treatment of alloimmune HDN can be recommended, and should include blinding of the intervention by use of a placebo as well as sufficient sample size to assess the potential for serious adverse effects