The Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry:a review and validation study

BACKGROUND: As a subregistry to the Western Denmark Heart Registry (WDHR), the Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry (WDHR-CCTR) is a clinical database established in 2008 to monitor and improve the quality of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in Western Denmark. OBJECTIVE: We examined the content, data quality, and research potential of the WDHR-CCTR. METHODS: We retrieved 2008–2012 data to examine the 1) content; 2) completeness of procedure registration using the Danish National Patient Registry as reference; 3) completeness of variable registration comparing observed vs expected numbers; and 4) positive predictive values as well as negative predictive values of 19 main patient and procedure variables. RESULTS: By December 31, 2012, almost 22,000 cardiac CTs with up to 40 variables for each procedure have been registered. Of these, 87% were coronary CT angiography performed in patients with symptoms indicative of coronary artery disease. Compared with the Danish National Patient Registry, the overall procedure completeness was 72%. However, an additional medical record review of 282 patients registered in the Danish National Patient Registry, but not in the WDHR-CCTR, showed that coronary CT angiographies accounted for only 23% of all nonregistered cardiac CTs, indicating >90% completeness of coronary CT angiographies in the WDHR-CCTR. The completeness of individual variables varied substantially (range: 0%–100%), but was >85% for more than 70% of all variables. Using medical record review of 250 randomly selected patients as reference standard, the positive predictive value for the 19 variables ranged from 89% to 100% (overall 97%), whereas the negative predictive value ranged from 97% to 100% (overall 99%). Stratification by center status showed consistently high positive and negative predictive values for both university (96%/99%) and nonuniversity centers (97%/99%). CONCLUSION: WDHR-CCTR provides ongoing prospective registration of all cardiac CTs performed in Western Denmark since 2008. Overall, the registry data have a high degree of completeness and validity, making it a valuable tool for clinical epidemiological research

Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFRCT With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare head-to-head fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) stress perfusion imaging for prediction of standard-of-care-guided coronary revascularization in patients with stable chest pain and obstructive coronary artery disease by coronary CTA. BACKGROUND: FFRCT is a novel modality for noninvasive functional testing. The clinical utility of FFRCT compared to CMR stress perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease is unknown. METHODS: Prospective study of patients (n=110) with stable angina pectoris and 1 or more coronary stenosis ≥50% by coronary CTA. All patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. Revascularization was FFR-guided in stenoses ranging from 30% to 90%. FFRCT ≤0.80 in 1 or more coronary artery or a reversible perfusion defect (≥2 segments) by CMR categorized patients with ischemia. FFRCT and CMR were analyzed by core laboratories blinded for patient management. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients (35%) underwent revascularization. Per-patient diagnostic performance for identifying standard-of-care-guided revascularization, (95% confidence interval) yielded a sensitivity of 97% (86 to 100) for FFRCT versus 47% (31 to 64) for CMR, p  0.05, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable chest pain referred to invasive coronary angiography based on coronary CTA, FFRCT and CMR yielded similar overall diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity for prediction of revascularization was highest for FFRCT, whereas specificity was highest for CMR.Danish Heart Foundation (grant no. 15-R99-A5837-22920)Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Regio

Minimal dose CT for left ventricular ejection fraction and combination with chest-abdomen-pelvis CT

Objectives: This prospective study tested the diagnostic accuracy, and absolute agreement with MRI of a low-dose CT protocol for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. Furthermore we assessed its potential for combining it with Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis CT (CAP-CT) for a one-stop examination. Materials & methods: Eighty-two patients underwent helical low-dose CT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the reference standard. In fifty patients, CAP-CT was performed concurrently, using a modified injection protocol. In these, LVEF was measured with radioisotope cardiography (MUGA). Patients >18 years, without contrast media or MRI contraindications, were included. Bias was measured with Bland-Altman analysis, classification accuracy with Receiver Operating Characteristics, and inter-reader agreement with Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Correlation was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. CAP image quality was compared to previous scans with visual grading characteristics. Results: The mean CT dose-length-product (DLP) was 51.8 mGycm, for an estimated effective dose of 1.4 mSv, compared to 5.7 mSv for MUGA. CT LVEF bias was between 2 % and 10 %, overestimating end-diastolic volume. When corrected for bias, sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 98.5 % for classifying reduced LVEF (50 % MRI value) was achieved. ICC for MUGA was significantly lower than MRI and CT. Distinction of renal medulla and cortex was reduced in the CAP scan, but proportion of diagnostic scans was not significantly different from standard protocol. Conclusion: When corrected for inter-modality bias, CT classifies patients with reduced LVEF with high accuracy at a quarter of MUGA dose and can be combined with CAP-CT without loss of diagnostic quality