47 research outputs found

    Wood-rotting Basidiomycetes--Itasca State Park Annotated List

    Get PDF
    This study reports 216 species of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes from Lake Itasca State Park in Minnesota. Of these, two species, Gloeocystidiellum heimii Boid. and Phanerochaete cumulodentata (Nikol) Parm., are reported for the first time from North America

    Fungi Associated with Decay in Treated Southern Pine Utility Poles in the Eastern United States

    Get PDF
    Approximately 1,320 fungi were isolated and studied from 246 creosote- or pentachlorophenol-treated southern pine poles in service in the eastern United States. The fungi identified were Basidiomycete decayers, soft rotters, and microfungi. White rot fungi predominated in the 262 Basidiomycete decayers isolated from 180 poles. The major Basidiomycetes isolated by radial position from poles of varying service ages appeared to develop initially in the outer treated zones and were often associated with seasoning checks. Some decay origins, however, appeared to be cases of preinvasion and escapes of preservative treatment. Five species of soft rot fungi comprised nearly 85% of 211 isolates obtained from 131 poles. They were isolated primarily from creosote-treated poles in outer treated zones at the groundline. Dissection analysis of 92 poles indicated that six developmental decay patterns and certain fungi were associated commonly with a pattern. The pole mycoflora isolated was relatively uniform in distribution in the eastern United States. The soft rotters and white rot group of Basidiomycete decayers appear to be a more important component of the treated southern pine pole mycoflora than has been recognized previously

    Baseline characteristics of people experiencing homelessness with a recent drug overdose in the PHOENIx pilot randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Drug-related deaths in Scotland are the highest in Europe. Half of all deaths in people experiencing homelessness are drug related, yet we know little about the unmet health needs of people experiencing homelessness with recent non-fatal overdose, limiting a tailored practice and policy response to a public health crisis. Methods: People experiencing homelessness with at least one non-fatal street drug overdose in the previous 6 months were recruited from 20 venues in Glasgow, Scotland, and randomised into PHOENIx plus usual care, or usual care. PHOENIx is a collaborative assertive outreach intervention by independent prescriber NHS Pharmacists and third sector homelessness workers, offering repeated integrated, holistic physical, mental and addictions health and social care support including prescribing. We describe comprehensive baseline characteristics of randomised participants. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight participants had a mean age of 42 years (SD 8.4); 71% male, homelessness for a median of 24 years (IQR 12–30). One hundred and eighteen (92%) lived in large, congregate city centre temporary accommodation. A quarter (25%) were not registered with a General Practitioner. Participants had overdosed a mean of 3.2 (SD 3.2) times in the preceding 6 months, using a median of 3 (IQR 2–4) non-prescription drugs concurrently: 112 (87.5%) street valium (benzodiazepine-type new psychoactive substances); 77 (60%) heroin; and 76 (59%) cocaine. Half (50%) were injecting, 50% into their groins. 90% were receiving care from Alcohol and Drug Recovery Services (ADRS), and in addition to using street drugs, 90% received opioid substitution therapy (OST), 10% diazepam for street valium use and one participant received heroin-assisted treatment. Participants had a mean of 2.2 (SD 1.3) mental health problems and 5.4 (SD 2.5) physical health problems; 50% received treatment for physical or mental health problems. Ninety-one per cent had at least one mental health problem; 66% had no specialist mental health support. Participants were frail (70%) or pre-frail (28%), with maximal levels of psychological distress, 44% received one or no daily meal, and 58% had previously attempted suicide. Conclusions: People at high risk of drug-related death continue to overdose repeatedly despite receiving OST. High levels of frailty, multimorbidity, unsuitable accommodation and unmet mental and physical health care needs require a reorientation of services informed by evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration UK Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ISRCTN 10585019

    Pharmacist led homeless outreach engagement and non-medical independent prescribing (Rx) (PHOENIx) intervention for people experiencing homelessness: a non- randomised feasibility study

    Get PDF
    Background: Homelessness and associated mortality and multimorbidity rates are increasing. Systematic reviews have demonstrated a lack of complex interventions that decrease unscheduled emergency health services utilisation or increase scheduled care. Better evidence is needed to inform policy responses. We examined the feasibility of a complex intervention (PHOENIx: Pharmacist led Homeless Outreach Engagement Nonmedical Independent prescribing (Rx)) to inform a subsequent pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods: Non-randomised trial with Usual Care (UC) comparator group set in Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Scotland. Participants were adult inpatients experiencing homelessness in a city centre Glasgow hospital, referred to the PHOENIx team at the point of hospital discharge, from 19th March 2018 until 6th April 2019. The follow up period for each patient started on the day the patient was first seen (Intervention group) or first referred (UC), until 24th August 2019, the censor date for all patients. All patients were offered and agreed to receive serial consultations with the PHOENIx team (NHS Pharmacist prescriber working with Simon Community Scotland (third sector homeless charity worker)). Patients who could not be reached by the PHOENIx team were allocated to the UC group. The PHOENIx intervention included assessment of physical/mental health, addictions, housing, benefits and social activities followed by pharmacist prescribing with referral to other health service specialities as necessary. All participants received primary (including specialist homelessness health service based general practitioner care, mental health and addictions services) and secondary care. Main outcome measures were rates of: recruitment; retention; uptake of the intervention; and completeness of collected data, from recruitment to censor date. Results: Twenty four patients were offered and agreed to participate; 12 were reached and received the intervention as planned with a median 7.5 consultations (IQR3.0–14.2) per patient. The pharmacist prescribed a median of 2 new (IQR0.3–3.8) and 2 repeat (1.3–7.0) prescriptions per patient; 10(83%) received support for benefits, housing or advocacy. Twelve patients were not subsequently contactable after leaving hospital, despite agreeing to participate, and were assigned to UC. Two patients in the UC group died of drug/alcohol overdose during follow up; no patients in the Intervention group died. All 24 patients were retained in the intervention or UC group until death or censor date and all patient records were accessible at follow up: 11(92%) visited ED in both groups, with 11(92%) hospitalisations in intervention group, 9(75%) UC. Eight (67%) intervention group patients and 3(25%) UC patients attended scheduled out patient appointments. Conclusions: Feasibility testing of the PHOENIx intervention suggests merit in a subsequent pilot RCT

    Parenting for lifelong health:A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a non-commercialised parenting programme for adolescents and their families in South Africa

    Get PDF
    Objective To assess the impact of ‘Parenting for Lifelong Health: Sinovuyo Teen’, a parenting programme for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries, on abuse and parenting practices. Design Pragmatic cluster randomised control trial. Setting 40 villages/urban sites (clusters) in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Participants 552 families reporting conflict with their adolescents (aged 10-18). Intervention Intervention clusters (n=20) received a 14-session parent and adolescent programme delivered by trained community members. Control clusters (n=20) received a hygiene and hand-washing promotion programme. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes: abuse and parenting practices at one and 5-9 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes: Caregiver and adolescent mental health and substance use, adolescent behavioural problems, social support, exposure to community violence, and family financial wellbeing at 5-9 months post-intervention. Blinding was not possible. Results At 5-9 months post-intervention, the intervention was associated with lower abuse (caregiver report incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.75, p Conclusions This parenting programme shows promise for reducing violence, improving parenting and family functioning in low-resource settings.</p

    Holistic health and social care outreach for people experiencing homelessness with recent non-fatal overdose in Glasgow, Scotland: the Pharmacist and third sector Homeless charity worker Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent prescriber Rx (PHOENIx) pilot randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Objectives: To examine randomised controlled trial (RCT) progression criteria including emergency department (ED) attendance and non-fatal overdose, from a holistic, integrated health and social care outreach intervention (PHOENIx), for people experiencing homelessness with recent non-fatal street drug overdose. Design: Pilot RCT. 1:1 randomisation to PHOENIx plus usual care (UC) or UC. Setting: Glasgow, Scotland. Participants: 128 adults experiencing homelessness with at least one non-fatal street drug overdose in the preceding 6 months. Interventions: Pharmacists from the National Health Service and third sector homelessness workers offered weekly outreach. PHOENIx teams develop therapeutic relationships to address health (physical health, mental health and problem drug use) and social care (housing, welfare benefits and social prescribing) in addition to UC. UC comprised building-based primary and secondary health, social and third sector services. Outcomes: Primary: progression criteria: recruitment (≥100 participants in 4 months); ≥80% of participants with data collected at baseline, 6 and 9 months; ≥60% of participants retained in the trial at each follow-up period (6 and 9 months); ≥60% of participants receiving the intervention weekly; any reduction in the rate of presentation to ED and overdoses, at 6- or 9-month follow-up. Secondary: participants with, and time to: hospitalisations; health-related quality of life (QoL); treatment uptake for physical and mental health conditions, and problematic drug use. Results: Progression criteria were exceeded. In PHOENIx compared with UC, there appeared to be a delay in the median time to ED visit, overdose and hospitalisation but no improvement in number of participants with ED visits, overdoses or hospitalisations. QoL and treatment uptake appeared to be higher in PHOENIx versus UC at 6 and 9 months. Conclusions: A definitive RCT is merited, to assess the impact of PHOENIx on people with multiple, severe disadvantages

    Goserelin for Ovarian Protection During Breast-Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy

    Full text link
    Premature ovarian failure is a devastating long-term toxic effect of chemotherapy for premenopausal women. The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with operable hormone receptor–negative breast cancer is well known, but concern over becoming infertile may influence the choice of treatment for many women. A number of trials have investigated the combined use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and adjuvant chemotherapy in an attempt to protect ovarian function in premenopausal women. Results of such studies were mixed, and there were few data on pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this randomized trial was to determine whether administration of the GnRH agonist goserelin with chemotherapy would reduce the rate of ovarian failure after adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment of hormone-receptor–negative early-stage breast cancer. A total of 257 premenopausal women with operable hormone receptor–negative breast cancer were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy with goserelin (goserelin group) or standard chemotherapy without goserelin (chemotherapy-alone group). The rate of ovarian failure at 2 years was the primary study end point. Ovarian failure was defined as the absence of menses for the preceding 6 months and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in the postmenopausal range at 2 years. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare rates. Secondary end points evaluated included pregnancy outcomes and disease-free and overall survival. Of the 257 patients, 218 were eligible and could be evaluated: 113 in the chemotherapy-alone group and 105 in the goserelin group. Complete primary end-point data were available for 135 of the 218 patients who could be evaluated. Among these, the ovarian failure rate was 8% in the goserelin group and 22% in the chemotherapy-alone group; the odds ratio was 0.30, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.09 to 0.97; 2-sided P = 0.04. To determine the effect of the missing primary end-point data on the main study findings, sensitivity analyses were performed. The results of these analyses showed that the missing data had no significant effect on the association between treatment and stratification variables (age and planned chemotherapy regimen). Among the 218 patients who could be evaluated, more women became pregnant in the goserelin group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (21% vs 11%, P = 0.03). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that more women in the goserelin group had improved disease-free survival (P = 0.04) and overall survival (P = 0.05). Consistent with the findings of previous randomized trials, these data suggest that administration of a GnRH agonist with chemotherapy protects ovarian function, reducing the risk of early menopause and improving prospects for fertility. Although missing primary-end-point data weaken interpretation of the findings, there is no evidence that the missing data influenced the relative comparison between randomized groups
    corecore