20 research outputs found
Somatic expansion of premutation alleles and the role of the mismatch repair and base excision repair proteins on repeat expansion in a mouse model of the fragile X-related disorders
The Fragile X-related disorders arise from an unusual mutation in the X-linked FMR1 gene. The mutation involves expansion, or an increase in the number of repeats, in a CGGā¢CCG repeat tract located in its 5' untranslated region. FMR1 alleles carrying 55-200 repeats are called Premutation (PM) alleles, and cause Fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and Fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). FMR1 alleles having more than 200 repeats are referred to as full mutation (FM) alleles and cause Fragile X syndrome (FXS). These different alleles arise by intergenerational expansion of the repeat tract from smaller unstable alleles by a mechanism that is unknown. We have shown that in addition to germ line expansion, somatic expansion also occurs in a human cell line in vivo and in a FX PM mouse model. In the mouse model, we found that the extent of somatic instability is dependent on age, gender and tissue. Specifically, organs such as brain, liver and gonads are susceptible to expand more than heart and kidney and expansion is much more frequent in males than in females. No differences were found between male and female mice in the levels of the DNA repair proteins that had already been implicated in repeat expansion in model systems of other disorders thought to arise via a similar mechanism. Neither were there any differences between males and females in the amounts of proteins produced from X-linked DNA repair genes. We also showed that estrogen did not protect against expansion. However, we found that PM alleles expanded exclusively when they were located on the active X chromosome. Thus some of the differences between males and xii females in the level of somatic expansion might be due to the fact that females undergo X inactivation and thus have the PM allele on the inactive X chromosome in half (~50%) of their cells. It also indicates that transcription and/or an open chromatin configuration is required for expansion in the FX PM mouse
Heterozygosity for a hypomorphic polĪ² mutation reduces the expansion frequency in a mouse model of the fragile x-related disorders
Author Summary Unstable microsatellites are responsible for a number of debilitating human diseases known as the Repeat Expansion Diseases. The unstable microsatellites, which consist of tandem arrays of short repeat units, are prone to increase in length (expand) on intergenerational transmission and during the lifetime of the individual. Unlike the typical microsatellite instability seen in disorders like Lynch syndrome that arise from mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, expansions of these microsatellites are abolished when MMR is lost. However, how MMR, which normally protects the genome against microsatellite instability, actually promotes microsatellite expansions in these diseases is unknown. There is evidence to suggest that a second DNA repair process, base excision repair (BER), may be involved, but whether the nicks generated early in the BER-process are subverted by an MMR-dependent pathway that generates expansions or whether some MMR proteins contribute to a BER-based expansion process is unclear. Here we show that a mutation that reduces the activity of PolĪ², an essential BER enzyme, also reduces the expansion frequency. Since PolĪ² is essential for key events in BER downstream of the generation of nicks, our data favor a model in which expansions occur via a BER-dependent pathway in which MMR participates
A MutSĪ²-Dependent Contribution of MutSĪ± to Repeat Expansions in Fragile X Premutation Mice?
Author Summary: The repeat expansion diseases are a group of human genetic disorders that are caused by expansion of a specific microsatellite in a single affected gene. How this expansion occurs is unknown, but previous work in various models for different diseases in the group, including the fragile X-related disorders (FXDs), has implicated the mismatch repair complex MutSĪ² in the process. With the exception of somatic expansion in Friedreich ataxia, MutSĪ± has not been reported to contribute to generation of expansions in other disease models. Here we show that MutSĪ± does in fact play a role in both germ line and somatic expansions in a mouse model of the FXDs since the expansion frequency is significantly reduced in Msh6 -/- mice. However, since we have previously shown that loss of MutSĪ² eliminates almost all expansions, MutSĪ± is apparently not able to fully substitute for MutSĪ² in the expansion process. We also show here that MutSĪ± increases the stability of the structures formed by the fragile X repeats that are thought to be the substrates for expansion and promotes binding of MutSĪ² to the repeats. This, together with our genetic data, suggests possible models for how MutSĪ± and MutSĪ², could co-operate to generate repeat expansions in the FXDs
The fragile X locus is prone to spontaneous DNA damage that is preferentially repaired by nonhomologous end-joining to preserve genome integrity
Summary: A long CGG-repeat tract in the FMR1 gene induces the epigenetic silencing that causes fragile X syndrome (FXS). Epigenetic changes include H4K20 trimethylation, a heterochromatic modification frequently implicated in transcriptional silencing. Here, we report that treatment with A-196, an inhibitor of SUV420H1/H2, the enzymes responsible for H4K20 di-/trimethylation, does not affect FMR1 transcription, but does result in increased chromosomal duplications. Increased duplications were also seen in FXS cells treated with SCR7, an inhibitor of Lig4, a ligase essential for NHEJ. Our study suggests that the fragile X (FX) locus is prone to spontaneous DNA damage that is normally repaired by NHEJ. We suggest that heterochromatinization of the FX allele may be triggered, at least in part, in response to this DNA damage
Expression of various BER proteins in different mouse organs.
<p>Total protein was extracted from different organs of 3 different FXD mice as described in the Materials and Methods. Since in our experience proteins used as ānormalizing controlsā including Ī²-actin and Ī±-tubulin and GAPDH differ significantly in different organs, we took care to analyze equal amounts of protein as assessed by the Bradford Assay. Ten micrograms of protein from the organs of each animal were pooled and loaded onto 3ā8% Tris-Acetate gels, resolved by gel electrophoresis and subjected to Western blotting as described in the Materials and Methods.</p
The effect of heterozygosity for the <i>PolBC</i> mutation on the number of expansions, contractions and unchanged alleles seen in the gametes of 3-month-old male mice.
<p>Small pool PCR was carried out on sperm DNA isolated from two 3-month-old <i>PolB+/+</i> and two 3-month-old <i>PolB+/C</i> male mice as described in the Materials and Methods. These animals all had ~140 repeats. The difference between the number of expansions, contractions and unchanged alleles within each genotype and between the two genotypes was evaluated by Fisherās exact test. The error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. There were no significant within genotype differences in the frequency of expansions, contractions or unchanged alleles. Allele classes that are significantly different in <i>PolB+/C</i> mice are marked with asterisks. Expansions were significantly reduced in <i>PolB+/C</i> gametes (p = 0.0001) and contractions significantly increased (p = 0.0001) by Fisherās exact test.</p
The effect of heterozygosity for the <i>PolBC</i> mutation on the distribution of repeat number changes seen in the gametes of 11-month-old male mice.
<p>The percentage of alleles with the indicated change in repeat number that were seen in the gametes of three 11-month-old mice <i>PolB+/+</i> and three 11-month old <i>PolB+/C</i> mice. The grey arrowheads indicate the local maxima seen in the distribution of <i>PolB+/C</i> alleles. The mean gain of repeats was 8.75 (SD = 5.96) for <i>PolB+/+</i> and 14.04 (SD = 8.70) for <i>PolB+/C</i>. This resulted in a distribution of expanded alleles that was significantly different in the two genotypes (p = 0.0001; <i>t</i> test). Too few contractions were seen to carry out any statistical analysis. Inset: <i>PolB+/C</i> mice have fewer small expansions and more large expansions than <i>PolB+/+</i> mice. The error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. Repeat size classes that are significantly different in <i>PolB+/C</i> mice are marked with an asterisk. The decrease in the number of alleles with 1ā5 repeats was significant at p = 0.0001, and the increase in the number of alleles with >15 repeats was also significant at p = 0.0001.</p
PolB+/C mice show a reduced somatic instability index in testis and tail.
<p>The somatic instability index of different organs of three 16 month old <i>PolB+/+</i> and three 16 month old <i>PolB+/C</i> mice with ~140 repeats was determined as previously described [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005181#pgen.1005181.ref046" target="_blank">46</a>]. Tail 1 and tail 2 refer to tail samples taken at 3 weeks of age and tail samples taken at 16 months respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviations. The significance of the differences in the SII for different genotypes was determined using Studentās t-test. The tissues in which the SII was significantly lower in <i>PolB+/C</i> mice are indicated by asterisks. The SII for <i>PolB+/C</i> testis was significantly lower at p = 0.001 and the SII for the <i>PolB+/C</i> tail 2 sample was significantly lower at p = 0.013.</p
The effect of heterozygosity for the <i>PolBC</i> mutation on the distribution of repeat number changes seen in the gametes of 3-month-old male mice.
<p>The percentage of alleles with the indicated gains or losses in repeat number for <i>PolB+/+</i> and <i>PolB+/C</i> mice was plotted. The mean gain of repeats was 3.17 (SD = 2.52) for <i>PolB+/+</i> and 5.43 (SD = 4.48) for <i>PolB+/C</i>. This resulted in a distribution of expanded alleles that was significantly different in the two genotypes (p = 0.0001; <i>t</i> test). The mean loss of repeats was 10.83 (SD = 11.05) for <i>PolB+/+</i> and 19.68 (SD = 31.58) for <i>PolB+/C</i>. The very high standard deviations due to the presence of some very large contractions particularly in the <i>PolB+/C</i> mice resulted in a distribution of contracted alleles that was not significantly different in the two genotypes. Inset: <i>PolB+/C</i> mice have fewer small expansions and more large expansions than <i>PolB+/+</i> mice. The error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. Repeat size classes that are significantly different in <i>PolB+/C</i> mice are marked with an asterisk. The decrease in the number of alleles with 1ā5 repeats was significant at p = 0.0001, and the increase in the number of alleles with >10 repeats was significant at p = 0.005.</p
Model for BER-mediated repeat expansion in the FX PM mouse.
<p>Nicks that do not get repaired by short patch BER may be channeled into one of two branches of the LP BER pathway. (<i>i) The PolĪ²-dependent</i>, <i>PolĪ“/PolĪµ-independent branch</i>. Nick processing is carried out by PolĪ², a poorly processive polymerase with weak strand-displacement activity. The resultant small flaps are processed by FEN1 to generate a ligatable 5ā end that still contains a few additional flap bases (shown in orange). (ii) The <i>PolĪ²/PolĪ“/PolĪµ-dependent branch</i>. Since both PolĪ“ and PolĪµ are more processive than PolĪ², more strand slippage and more extensive strand displacement may result. Repriming of DNA synthesis on the slipped-strand using PolĪ² would not remove looped out bases (shown in red) since PolĪ² lacks a suitable proofreading activity. Limited strand displacement by PolĪ² or more extensive strand displacement by PolĪ“/PolĪµ, followed by FEN1 cleavage could also result a ligatable end that still contains some flap bases (shown in orange). In either case, repair synthesis initiated on the complementary strand would fix the supernumerary bases into the derivative allele thus generating either a small (i) or large (ii) expansion. MMR proteins may facilitate this process by stabilizing the hairpins. These proteins may also directly generate expansions by channelling the hairpins formed during BER into the MMR pathway.</p