The physiological effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure following aneurysm repair

AbstractObjectives: elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may cause widespread organ dysfunction (abdominal compartment syndrome) through effects on the respiratory, cardiac, renal and gastro-intestinal systems. The aim of this study was to document IAP following aneurysm surgery, and to determine the effect of IAH on outcome. Design: prospective observational study. Setting: University Hospital. Subjects: the patient cohort comprised 75 patients undergoing infra-renal aneurysm repair (53 non-ruptured [40 conventional - 1 death, 13 endovascular] and 22 conventionally repaired ruptured AAA - 8 deaths). IAP was quantified by bladder manometry at the termination of the procedure and at 24 h intervals in patients who remained intubated. Physiological indices of organ function were recorded. Statistical analysis utilized the unpaired t-test, Fischer's exact test and Pearson's correlation. Results: IAP was significantly higher at abdominal closure following ruptured aneurysm repair (15.4 mmHg [SE 1.6]) than conventional (10.5 [0.89]) or endovascular elective repair (6.4 [1.0]) of non-ruptured AAA. The sensitivity and specificity of IAP to predict subsequent mortality was analysed using a receiver characteristic operating curve. This analysis demonstrated that a cut off of 15 mmHg was the most useful for indicating patients at risk (sensitivity 0.66, specificity 0.79). Physiological indices of organ dysfunction (pH[p = 0.027], base excess [p = 0.005], peak inspiratory pressure [p = 0.0015], CVP and urine output [p = 0.0029]) were significantly impaired in patients with IAP ≥ 15 mmHg, in comparison to patients with lower pressures. IAP correlated significantly with indices of cardiac (CVP p = 0.038), respiratory (PaO2/FiO2, p = 0.026), and renal function (urine output p = 0.046). Conclusions: these data suggest that the management of IAH may have a role following repair of ruptured AAA. High intra-abdominal pressures rarely complicate elective or endovascular aneurysm repair.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26, 293-298 (2003

A Single-Lumen Central Venous Catheter for Continuous and Direct Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement

Background: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, the need for a good diagnostic tool to predict intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and progression to ACS is paramount. Bladder pressure (BP) has been used for several years for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement but has the disadvantage that it is not a continuous measurement. In this study, a single-lumen central venous catheter (CVC) is placed through the abdominal wall into the abdominal cavity to continuously and directly monitor the intra-abdominal pressure (CDIAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of CDIAP to measure BP as a representative of the true IAP. Methods: Both BP and CDIAP were prospectively recorded on a variety of surgical patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 2003 up to December 2004. At the end of the surgical procedure, the CVC was placed through the abdominal wall and connected to a pressure transducer. In addition, the BP was measured through the urine drainage port after clamping the catheter and filling the bladder with 50 ml of 0.9% saline. At least three paired measurements (BP and CDIAP) were performed for at least one day on the ICU in a standardized manner at preset time intervals on each patient. The paired measurements were compared using the Bland-Altman (B-A) method. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Over a period of 22 months (March 2003 until December 2004), 125 paired measurements of both BP and CDIAP were recorded on 25 patients. The mean age was 72.4 ± 6.6 years. Eighteen patients underwent central vascular surgery, and seven patients with peritonitis received laparotomy. The mean CDIAP was 11.4 ± 4.8 (range 2-30) mmHg, and the BP was 12.9 ± 5.3 (range 3-37) mmHg. The mean difference between CDIAP and BP was 1.6 ± 2.7 mmHg. There was an acceptable level of agreement (intraclass correlation 0.82) between IAP measured by BP and IAP measured via CDIAP. Conclusion: Continuous direct intra-abdominal pressure measurement proved that the BP measurement approach of Kron is representative of the IAP. CDIAP measurement is accurate and makes it easier for the nursing staff to be informed of the IAP