Publications ethics

The editor of any medical journal has to be aware of the ethical and legal framework within which medical research is conducted. When research and publications relate to children, then particularly high standards are required in the design, conduct, and reporting of research in order to protect the rights of children and their families. Authors have a number of duties and responsibilities that are mirrored by those of editors and publishers. Of particular importance are the principles of transparency and integrity. Authors should be explicit about who carried out the work and who funded the study. They should declare whether the work has been published before and is not being considered for publication elsewhere. The authors must protect the rights of research participants including their anonymity. Editors and publishers have a duty to ensure high editorial standards and efficient and effective peer review systems. They should follow ethical and responsible publication practices and should safeguard the intellectual property of the authors. This review discusses in detail the duties and responsibilities of authors, editors, and publishers in modern medical publishing

Perioperative Sleep and Breathing

Sleep disruption has been implicated in morbidity after major surgery since 1974. Sleep-related upper airway obstruction has been associated with death after upper airway surgery and profound episodic hypoxaemia in the early postoperative period. There is also evidence for a rebound in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep that might be contributing to an increase in episodic sleep-related hypoxaemic events later in the first postoperative week. Speculation regarding the role of REM sleep rebound in the generation of late postoperative morbidity and mortality has evolved into dogma without any direct evidence to support it. The research presented in this thesis involved two main areas: a search for evidence of a clinically important contribution of REM sleep rebound to postoperative morbidity, and a re-examination of the role of sleep in the causation of postoperative episodic hypoxaemic events. To assess the latter, a relationship between airway obstruction under anaesthesia and the severity of sleep-disordered breathing was sought. In 148 consecutive sleep clinic patients, 49% of those with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) had a number of events in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) that was greater than or equal to that in REM and 51% had saturation nadirs in NREM that were equal to or worse than their nadirs in REM. This suggests SDB is not a REM-predominant phenomenon for most patients. Of 1338 postoperative deaths occurring over 6.5 years in one hospital only 37 were unexpected, most of which were one or two days after surgery with no circadian variation in the time of death, casting further doubt on the potential role of REM rebound. Five of nine subjects studied preoperatively had moderately severe SDB. Unrecognised and significant SDB is common in middle-aged and elderly patients presenting for surgery suggesting overall perioperative risk of important adverse events from SDB is probably small. In 17 postoperative patients, sleep macro-architecture was variably altered with decreases in REM and slow wave sleep while stage 1 sleep and a state of pre-sleep onset drowsiness, both associated with marked ventilatory instability, were increased. Sleep micro-architecture was also changed with an increase in power in the alpha-beta electroencephalogram range. These micro-architectural changes result in ambiguity in the staging of postoperative sleep that may have affected the findings of this and other studies. Twenty-four subjects with airway management difficulty under anaesthesia were all found to have some degree of SDB. Those with the most obstruction-prone airways while anaesthetised had a very high incidence of severe SDB. Such patients warrant referral to a sleep clinic

Government and the British aircraft industry, 1945-1979

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

A review series on the management of burns injury

In the southern hemisphere winter of 2019, the editors of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (A&IC) discussed and agreed upon the idea of reintroducing theme issues containing a series of reviews and perhaps other articles on particular subjects that may be of interest to our readership. This is not a novel concept for A&IC or other journals. Indeed, the very first volume of A&IC featured a symposium issue on paediatric anaesthesia and intensive care (Vol. 1, No. 6, Nov. 1973) with Kester Brown appointed by Ben Barry as ‘Special Editor’..

Opioids, ventilation and acute pain management

Despite the increasing use of a variety of different analgesic strategies, opioids continue as the mainstay for management of moderate to severe acute pain. However, concerns remain about their potential adverse effects on ventilation. The most commonly used term, respiratory depression, only describes part of that risk. Opioid-induced ventilatory impairment (OIVI) is a more complete term encompassing opioid-induced central respiratory depression (decreased respiratory drive), decreased level of consciousness (sedation) and upper airway obstruction, all of which, alone or in combination, may result in decreased alveolar ventilation and increased arterial carbon dioxide levels. Concerns about OIVI are warranted, as deaths related to opioid administration in the acute pain setting continue to be reported. Risks are often said to be higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. However; the tendency to use the term 'obstructive sleep apnoea' to encompass the much broader spectrum of sleep- and obesity-related hypoventilation syndromes and the related misuse of terminology in papers relating to obstructive sleep apnoea and sleep-disordered breathing remain significant problems in discussions of opioid-related effects. Opioids given for management of acute pain must be titrated to effect for each patient. However, strategies aiming for better pain scores alone, without highlighting the need for appropriate monitoring of OIVI, can and will lead to an increase in adverse events. Therefore, all patients must be monitored appropriately for OIVI (at the very least using sedation scores as a '6th vital sign') so that it can be detected at an early stage and appropriate interventions triggered.P. E. Macintyre, J. A. Loadsman, D. A. Scot