Role of lung ultrasound for the etiological diagnosis of acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in children: a prospective study

Objective and design: Our prospective study assesses the role of detailed lung ultrasound (LUS) features to discriminate the etiological diagnosis of acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in children. Methodology: We analyzed patients aged from 1 month to 17 years admitted between March 2018 and April 2020 who were hospitalized for ALRTI. For all patients, history, clinical parameters, microbiological data, and lung ultrasound data were collected. Patients were stratified into three main groups ("bacterial", "viral", "atypical") according to the presumed microbial etiology and LUS findings evaluated according to the etiological group. Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from all patients. A qualitative diagnostic test developed by Nurex S.r.l. was used for identification of bacterial and fungal DNA in respiratory samples. The Seegene Allplex™ Respiratory assays were used for the molecular diagnosis of viral respiratory pathogens. In addition, bacterial culture of blood and respiratory samples were performed, when indicated. Results: A total of 186 children with suspected ALRTI (44% female) with an average age of 6 were enrolled in the study. We found that some ultrasound findings as size, number and distribution of consolidations, the position and motion of air bronchograms, pleural effusions and distribution of vertical artifacts significantly differ (p < 0.05) in children with bacterial, viral and atypical ALRTI. Conclusion: Our study provides a detailed analysis of LUS features able to predict the ALRTI ethology in children. These findings may help the physicians to better manage a child with ALRTI and to offer personalized approach, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens isolated from blood culture: a performance comparison of Accelerate Pheno (TM) and VITEK (R) 2 systems with the broth microdilution method

Objectives: To compare the performance of the Accelerate Pheno\u2122 system with that of the conventional phenotypic VITEK\uae 2 system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacterial pathogens from positive blood culture (PBC) samples, based on the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method. Methods: Prospectively collected PBCs that represented patient-unique bloodstream infection episodes were included. For PBC samples showing monomicrobial growth (n\u2009=\u200986), AST was performed using both Accelerate Pheno\u2122 and VITEK\uae 2 systems directly from PBC broth. Colony isolates derived from subculture of PBC broth were then used for BMD testing. AST results were interpreted according to 2017 EUCAST breakpoints. Results: The overall categorical agreement between Accelerate Pheno\u2122 system and BMD was 92.7% (467/504) for Gram-negative organisms and 99.0% (95/96) for Gram-positive organisms, with rates for very major errors of 3.6% (6/166), major errors 2.2% (9/416) and minor errors 3.8% (23/600). The overall categorical agreement between the VITEK\uae 2 system and BMD was 91.7% (463/505) for Gram-negative organisms and 99.0% (97/98) for Gram-positive organisms, with rates of very major errors of 2.4% (4/169), major errors 1.0% (4/416) and minor errors 5.8% (35/603). Importantly, unlike the VITEK\uae 2 system, no false-susceptible results occurred with two colistin-resistant organism-growing PBCs tested using the Accelerate Pheno\u2122 system. Conclusions: Based on these findings, the Accelerate Pheno\u2122 system can be a valid alternative for the rapid AST of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in bloodstream infections

In vitro Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples

Blood culture (BC) is still the standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs), especially those caused by bacteria and fungi. Infection-complicating sepsis or septic shock often occurs at BSI onset, making necessary to improve the diagnostic yield of positive BCs. Among the BC systems currently available, the BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO® (VIRTUO) system has been developed to shorten time to detection (TTD) of positive BCs. In this study, we assessed TTD for 330 clinically relevant species including 14 Gram-positive, 14 Gram-negative, and 5 yeast isolates in spiked human blood samples that were tested in parallel with VIRTUO BACT/ALERT® 3D (BTA3D) and BACTEC™ FX (BACTEC) systems. We inoculated 30 colony-forming unit (CFU) from each microbial suspension into BACT/ALERT® Plus or BACTEC™ Plus (aerobic/anaerobic or pediatric) BC bottles, and we used two different blood volumes to simulate, respectively, the BCs collected from adult and pediatric patients. Of 2,610 bottles tested, 2,600 (99.6%) signaled positive in the three systems. Only the BACTEC system did not detect Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates in anaerobic bottles. Among adult simulated cultures, the median TTD was significantly shorter for aerobic/anaerobic bottles incubated in VIRTUO (11.6 h and 10.1 h) compared to bottles incubated in either BTA3D (13.3 and 12.3 h) or BACTEC (13.5 and 12.2 h) system. Among pediatric simulated cultures, the median TTD was significantly shorter for bottles incubated in VIRTUO (11.2 h) compared to bottles incubated in either the BTA3D (13.0 h) or BACTEC (12.5 h) system. Compared to BTA3D and/or BACTEC systems, VIRTUO allowed faster growth detection for most of the 33 microbial species tested. Notable examples were Salmonella spp. (7.4 h by VIRTUO vs. 10.1 h and 9.2 h by either BTA3D or BACTEC) and Streptococcus agalactiae (8.1 h by VIRTUO vs. 10.3 and 9.4 h by either BTA3D or BACTEC). The few notable exceptions included Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and some Candida species. Together, these findings confirm that VIRTUO has greater potential of improving the laboratory detection of bacteremia and fungemia than the progenitor BTA3D or the competitor BACTEC system

A New PCR-Based Assay for Testing Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples from Patients with Suspected Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

To support the clinical laboratory diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ) pneumonia (PCP), an invasive fungal infection mainly occurring in HIV-negative patients, in-house or commercial PJ-specific real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays are todays’ reliable options. The performance of these assays depends on the type of PJ gene (multi-copy mitochondrial versus single-copy nuclear) targeted by the assay. We described the development of a PJ-PCR assay targeting the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-encoding gene. After delineating its analytical performance, the PJ-PCR assay was used to test bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples from 200 patients (only seven were HIV positive) with suspected PCP. Of 211 BAL fluid samples, 18 (8.5%) were positive and 193 (91.5%) were negative by PJ-PCR. Of 18 PJ-PCR-positive samples, 11 (61.1%) tested positive and seven (38.9%) tested negative with the immunofluorescence assay (IFA). All (100%) of the 193 PJ-PCR-negative samples were IFA negative. Based on IFA/PCR results, patients were, respectively, classified as having (n = 18) and not having (n = 182) proven (PJ-PCR+/IFA+) or probable (PJ-PCR+/IFA−) PCP. For 182 patients without PCP, alternative infectious or non-infectious etiologies were identified. Our PJ-PCR assay was at least equivalent to IFA, fostering studies aimed at defining a qPCR-based standard for PCP diagnosis in the future

Two-Period Study Results from a Large Italian Hospital Laboratory Attesting SARS-CoV-2 Variant PCR Assay Evolution

In keeping with the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the COVID-19 causative agent, PCR assays have been developed to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 variants, which have emerged since the first (Alpha) variant was identified. Based on specific assortment of SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein mutations (ΔH69/V70, E484K, N501Y, W152C, L452R, K417N, and K417T) among the major variants known to date, Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Variants I and Variants II assays have been available since a few months before the last (Omicron) variant became predominant. Using S gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) as the SARS-CoV-2 variant identification reference method, we assessed the results of SARS-CoV-2-positive nasopharyngeal swab samples from two testing periods, before (n = 288, using only Variants I) and after (n = 77, using both Variants I and Variants II) the appearance of Omicron. The Variants I assay allowed correct identification for Alpha (37/37), Beta/Gamma (28/30), or Delta (220/221) variant-positive samples. The combination of the Variants I and Variants II assays allowed correct identification for 61/77 Omicron variant-positive samples. While 16 samples had the K417N mutation undetected with the Variants II assay, 74/77 samples had both ΔH69/V70 and N501Y mutations detected with the Variants I assay. If considering only the results by the Variants I assay, 6 (2 Beta variant positive, 1 Delta variant positive, and 3 Omicron variant positive) of 365 samples tested in total provided incorrect identification. We showed that the Variants I assay alone might be more suitable than both the Variants I and Variants II assays to identify currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. Inclusion of additional variant-specific mutations should be expected in the development of future assays. IMPORTANCE Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 pose more important public health concerns than the previously circulating Alpha or Delta variants, particularly regarding the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapeutics. Precise identification of these variants highly requires performant PCR-based assays that allow us to reduce the reliance on NGS-based assays, which remain the reference method in this topic. While the current epidemiological SARS-CoV-2 pandemic context suggests that PCR assays such as the Seegene Variants II may be dispensable, we took advantage of NGS data obtained in this study to show that the array of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mutations in the Seegene Variants II assay may be suboptimal. This reinforces the concept that initially developed PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 variant detection could be no longer helpful if the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic evolves to newly emerging variants

Direct MALDI-TOF MS Testing from Positive Blood Cultures for Rapid Identification of Bloodstream Infection-Causing Anaerobic Bacteria

Direct use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) on positive blood culture (PBC) bottles may accelerate the identification of bloodstream infection (BSI) causing organisms (1), particularly anaerobic bacteria for which BSI-associated mortality rates are high (2).