Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Feasible in Pediatric Patients with an Active or Recently Diagnosed Invasive Fungal Infection

Data on the outcome of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with a history of invasive fungal infection (IFI) are limited. The aim of this study was to report on the feasibility and outcome of allogenic HSCT in pediatric patients with an active or recently diagnosed IFI. In this retrospective, single-center study, 317 children underwent an allogenic HSCT (January 2012 to June 2020), of whom 23 had an active or recent (<6 months before transplantation) diagnosis of a probable or proven IFI before HSCT. Medical records were reviewed for data collection. Descriptive statistics were performed. One-year survival was described with Kaplan–Meier analysis. Four proven and 19 probable IFIs were diagnosed. The lungs were the main site of infection (22 out of 23 patients); brain involvement was diagnosed in six patients (26.1%). Aspergillus spp. were the most frequently identified organisms. Of the four patients diagnosed with mucormycosis, three had mixed infections with Aspergillus spp. One patient was diagnosed with Alternaria sinusitis and one patient with an infection with Curvularia spp. with both pulmonary and cutaneous involvement. One year after HSCT, 18 of the 23 patients (78.3%) were alive. Four of the five patients who did not survive died of non–IFI-related causes. One patient died due to a newly developed IFI post-transplant. Three patients showed non-fatal progression of their original IFIs that required prolonged antifungal treatment. Survival of this cohort of high-risk pediatric patients who underwent allogenic HSCT with an active or recently diagnosed IFI was favorable. An active IFI or recent history of IFI should not be a contraindication for proceeding to allogenic HSCT

Prophylactic use of liposomal amphotericin B in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A 10-years single center experience

Background: Azoles are recommended as antifungal prophylaxis in decreasing the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in high-risk patients in pediatric oncology, including patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, azole related toxicity, pharmacological interactions with immunosuppressive medication and conditioning regimen and growing incidence of azole resistance makes this antifungal agent not ideal in the transplant setting. This study reports on the contemporary incidence and outcome of IFD after allogeneic HCT in children with prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB). Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all patients transplanted between 2012 and 2022. Primary endpoint was the incidence of IFD until hospital discharge post-transplant. Secondary aims were the incidence of IFD and survival 180 days after allogeneic HCT, the evaluation of toxicity of L-AMB and further risk factors for development of IFD during antifungal prophylaxis. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: 161 pediatric patients received L-AMB. Incidence of breakthrough IFD post-transplant was 7.5 % (12/161). The 12 cases comprised of three invasive yeast infections (1.9 %), three probable (1.9 %) and six possible (3.7 %) mold infections. Adverse events were in 22.4 % of the patients, most of them mild and reversible. Discontinuation of L-AMB occurred in 2.5 % (4/161) of the patients due to severe hypersensitivity reactions. Conclusions: The risk of breakthrough IFD in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT under L-AMB prophylaxis is comparable with the reported risk under first line recommendation drugs for antifungal prophylaxis. If no hypersensitivity reaction occurs, L-AMB is tolerated with manageable side effects. This antifungal agent should therefore be considered as an alternative option to azoles in pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients

S-wave predominance of epicardial electrograms during atrial fibrillation in humans: indirect evidence for a role of the thin subepicardial layer.

Contains fulltext : 59318.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology of fibrillation electrograms in patients in order to provide insight into the underlying electropathologic substrate of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Electrograms recorded during AF show a high degree of spatiotemporal variation. METHODS: AF was induced by rapid atrial pacing in 25 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A unipolar mapping array of 244 electrodes was positioned on the free wall of the right atrium to record multiple epicardial fibrillation electrograms. Local anisotropy in conduction and epicardial wavefront curvature during AF were determined by fitting the best quadratic surface on the activation times of rectangular areas of 3 x 3 electrodes. RESULTS: During AF, unipolar epicardial electrograms revealed a clear predominance of S waves. The average RS difference during type I and II AF was -0.15 +/- 0.08 and -0.22 +/- 0.08. During type III AF, the predominance of S waves was less prominent (-0.07 +/- 0.05; P < .005). In all types of AF, the degree of anisotropy in conduction was remarkably low (anisotropy ratio: 1.24 +/- 0.09), and no clear directional effect on the relative amplitude of R and S waves was found. There was a weak relationship between local curvature of wavefronts and RS difference (r = 0.23; P < .01). Computer simulations showed that the negative RS difference could result from transmural activation in an epicardial to endocardial direction. CONCLUSIONS: The clear predominance of S waves in epicardial fibrillation electrograms is not due to anisotropy and can only be partly explained by a high curvature of fibrillation waves. Predominant epicardial to endocardial activation seems to be important in producing rS electrograms on the epicardium. This finding provides indirect evidence that the thin epicardial layer of atrial myocardium plays an important role in propagation of fibrillation waves

Viral reactivations and associated outcomes in the context of immune reconstitution after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation

Background: Viral reactivations (VRs) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Timely immune reconstitution (IR) is suggested to prevent VR. Objectives: We studied the relation between IR (as a continuous predictor over time) and VR (as a time-varying predictor) and the relation between VR and other clinical outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective analysis all patients receiving a first HCT between January 2004 and September 2014 were included. IR (CD3/CD4/CD8 T, natural killer, and B cells) was measured biweekly until 12 weeks and monthly thereafter. Main outcomes of interest were VR of adenovirus, EBV, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and BK virus screened weekly. Clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free-survival, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and graft-versus-host disease. Cox proportional hazard and Fine and Gray competing risk models were used. Results: Two hundred seventy-three patients (age, 0.1-22.7 years; median follow-up, 58 months) were included. Delayed CD4 reconstitution predicted reactivation of adenovirus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.995; P = .022), EBV (HR, 0.994; P = .029), and HHV6 (HR, 0.991; P = .012) but not CMV (P = .31) and BK virus (P = .27). Duration of adenovirus reactivation was shorter with timely CD4 reconstitution, which was defined as 50 × 106 cells/L or greater within 100 days. Adenovirus reactivation predicted lower OS (HR, 2.17; P = .0039) and higher NRM (HR, 2.96; P = .0008). Concomitant CD4 reconstitution abolished this negative effect of adenovirus reactivation (OS, P = .67; NRM, P = .64). EBV and HHV6 reactivations were predictors for the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease, whereas CMV and BK virus reactivation did not predict clinical outcomes. Conclusion: These results stress the importance of timely CD4 reconstitution. Strategies to improve CD4 reconstitution can improve HCT outcomes, including survival, and reduce the need for toxic antiviral therapies

Evaluation of newer risk markers for coronary heart disease risk classification: a cohort study.

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Whether newer risk markers for coronary heart disease (CHD) improve CHD risk prediction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newer risk markers for CHD risk prediction and stratification improve Framingham risk score (FRS) predictions. DESIGN: Prospective population-based study. SETTING: The Rotterdam Study, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 5933 asymptomatic, community-dwelling participants (mean age, 69.1 years [SD, 8.5]). MEASUREMENTS: Traditional CHD risk factors used in the FRS (age, sex, systolic blood pressure, treatment of hypertension, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, smoking, and diabetes) and newer CHD risk factors (N-terminal fragment of prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide levels, von Willebrand factor antigen levels, fibrinogen levels, chronic kidney disease, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein levels, homocysteine levels, uric acid levels, coronary artery calcium [CAC] scores, carotid intima-media thickness, peripheral arterial disease, and pulse wave velocity). RESULTS: Adding CAC scores to the FRS improved the accuracy of risk predictions (c-statistic increase, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06]; net reclassification index, 19.3% overall [39.3% in those at intermediate risk, by FRS]). Levels of N-terminal fragment of prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide also improved risk predictions but to a lesser extent (c-statistic increase, 0.02 [CI, 0.01 to 0.04]; net reclassification index, 7.6% overall [33.0% in those at intermediate risk, by FRS]). Improvements in predictions with other newer markers were marginal. LIMITATION: The findings may not be generalizable to younger or nonwhite populations. CONCLUSION: Among 12 CHD risk markers, improvements in FRS predictions were most statistically and clinically significant with the addition of CAC scores. Further investigation is needed to assess whether risk refinements using CAC scores lead to a meaningful change in clinical outcome. Whether to use CAC score screening as a more routine test for risk prediction requires full consideration of the financial and clinical costs of performing versus not performing the test for both persons and health systems. Primary Funding Source: Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)