Logistic regression for predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus.

<p>Logistic regression for predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus.</p

Relationship between glycated haemoglobin, placenta peptides and dyslipidemia among pregnant women with GDM (upper portion) and those without diabetes (lower portion).

<p>Relationship between glycated haemoglobin, placenta peptides and dyslipidemia among pregnant women with GDM (upper portion) and those without diabetes (lower portion).</p

Prevalence of GDM in the various age groups of the pregnant women.

<p>Prevalence of GDM in the various age groups of the pregnant women.</p

Comparison of biochemical variables in case subjects who developed GDM and those without GDM in the second trimester.

<p>Comparison of biochemical variables in case subjects who developed GDM and those without GDM in the second trimester.</p

Biochemical comparison between pregnant women who developed GDM (cases) and pregnant women withlow risk of diabetes (controls).

<p>Biochemical comparison between pregnant women who developed GDM (cases) and pregnant women withlow risk of diabetes (controls).</p

The receiver operator curve for fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin, β-HCG and insulin levels.

<p>Receiver operator curve and area under the curve (AUC) 95% CI. The area under the ROC for FBG-1 (at first trimester) was 0.49. However, AUC for FBG-2 was F 0.99 (0.97–1.00), for week 24–28. HbA1c = 0.53 (0.33–0.72), Insulin = 0.51 (0.28), β-HCG = 0.53 (0.37–0.70).</p

Biochemical characteristics of non-diabetic pregnant women (Cases) and pregnant women with regestational diabetes (control) in the first trimester.

<p>Biochemical characteristics of non-diabetic pregnant women (Cases) and pregnant women with regestational diabetes (control) in the first trimester.</p

Anthropometric and biochemical profile of study participants.

<p>Anthropometric and biochemical profile of study participants.</p

Baseline demographic, anthropometrics and biochemical indices of T2DM cases and control subjects stratified by vitamin D status.

<p>Baseline demographic, anthropometrics and biochemical indices of T2DM cases and control subjects stratified by vitamin D status.</p

Linear regression between vitamin D levels and HOMA-IR in deficient and non-deficient T2DM and controls.

<p>Vitamin D deficiency did not have any statistically significant association with HOMA-IR in both the T2DM and control groups [T2DM: r² = 0.0233, p = 0.1132 and Control: r² = 0.0214, p = 0.2690] respectively Fig 1A and Fig 1C. Significant positive association was seen in T2DM with non-deficient vitamin D levels and HOMA-IR levels Fig 1B [T2DM: r² = 0.8103, p = 0.0009] but no significant association was observed for Control: r² = 0.0689, p = 0.1064] Fig 1D.</p