ABO blood type and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

<p><b>Background</b>: ABO blood type is an invariant factor. There is a link between ABO blood type and some malignancies, such as gastric, pancreatic, and skin cancer. The role of ABO blood type in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between ABO blood type and risk of HCC.</p> <p><b>Methods</b>: Literature search was conducted among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Seven papers were included. They included 92,847 healthy subjects, 5,463 patients with hepatitis, 294 cirrhotic patients, and 3,322 HCC patients. The proportion of blood type O was significantly lower in HCC patients than healthy subjects (OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.66–0.87, P < 0.0001) without any significant heterogeneity (P = 0.55, I² = 0%). The proportions of blood types A, B, and <i>AB</i> were not significantly different between HCC patients and healthy subjects. The proportion of ABO blood type was not significantly different between patients with HCC and those with hepatitis or cirrhosis.</p> <p><b>Conclusion</b>: HCC patients might have a lower proportion of blood type O than healthy subjects. Among the patients with chronic liver diseases, ABO blood type might not be associated with the risk of HCC.</p

DataSheet_1_Unraveling the mystery: a Mendelian randomized exploration of gut microbiota and different types of obesity.pdf

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated the influence of gut microbiota on the development of obesity. In this study, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the gut microbiota characteristics among different types of obese patients, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and provide novel insights for obesity treatment.MethodsTwo-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess causal relationships between gut microbiota and various obesity subtypes. Gut microbiota data were obtained from the international consortium MiBioGen, and data on obese individuals were sourced from the Finnish National Biobank FinnGen. Eligible single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Various analytical methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, MR-RAPS, and Lasso regression, were applied. Sensitivity analyses for quality control included MR-Egger intercept tests, Cochran’s Q tests, and leave-one-out analyses and others.ResultsMendelian randomization studies revealed distinct gut microbiota profiles among European populations with different obesity subtypes. Following multivariable MR analysis, we found that Ruminococcaceae UCG010 [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.926, Adjusted P value: 0.028] independently reduced the risk of obesity induced by excessive calorie intake, while Butyricimonas [OR: 4.252, 95% CI: 2.177-8.307, Adjusted P value: 0.002] independently increased the risk of medication-induced obesity. For localized adiposity, Pasteurellaceae [OR: 0.213, 95% CI: 0.115-0.395, Adjusted P value: 0.05).ConclusionGut microbiota abundance is causally related to obesity, with distinct gut microbiota profiles observed among different obesity subtypes. Four bacterial species, including Ruminococcaceae UCG010, Butyricimonas, Pasteurellaceae and lactobacillus independently influence the development of various types of obesity. Probiotic and prebiotic supplementation may represent a novel approach in future obesity management.</p

DataSheet_5_Unraveling the mystery: a Mendelian randomized exploration of gut microbiota and different types of obesity.pdf

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated the influence of gut microbiota on the development of obesity. In this study, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the gut microbiota characteristics among different types of obese patients, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and provide novel insights for obesity treatment.MethodsTwo-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess causal relationships between gut microbiota and various obesity subtypes. Gut microbiota data were obtained from the international consortium MiBioGen, and data on obese individuals were sourced from the Finnish National Biobank FinnGen. Eligible single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Various analytical methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, MR-RAPS, and Lasso regression, were applied. Sensitivity analyses for quality control included MR-Egger intercept tests, Cochran’s Q tests, and leave-one-out analyses and others.ResultsMendelian randomization studies revealed distinct gut microbiota profiles among European populations with different obesity subtypes. Following multivariable MR analysis, we found that Ruminococcaceae UCG010 [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.926, Adjusted P value: 0.028] independently reduced the risk of obesity induced by excessive calorie intake, while Butyricimonas [OR: 4.252, 95% CI: 2.177-8.307, Adjusted P value: 0.002] independently increased the risk of medication-induced obesity. For localized adiposity, Pasteurellaceae [OR: 0.213, 95% CI: 0.115-0.395, Adjusted P value: 0.05).ConclusionGut microbiota abundance is causally related to obesity, with distinct gut microbiota profiles observed among different obesity subtypes. Four bacterial species, including Ruminococcaceae UCG010, Butyricimonas, Pasteurellaceae and lactobacillus independently influence the development of various types of obesity. Probiotic and prebiotic supplementation may represent a novel approach in future obesity management.</p

DataSheet_2_Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella: emerging protectors against Graves’ disease.pdf

BackgroundGraves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. Numerous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in the development of thyroid disorders. This study employs Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota in GD patients, aiming to offer novel insights into the etiology and treatment of Graves’ disease.MethodsTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess the causal relationship between Graves’ disease and the gut microbiota composition. Gut microbiota data were sourced from the international consortium MiBioGen, while Graves’ disease data were obtained from FINNGEN. Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Multiple analysis methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-RAPS, were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted employing MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis as quality control measures.ResultsThe Mendelian randomization study conducted in a European population revealed a decreased risk of Graves’ disease associated with Bacteroidaceae (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.89 ~ 0.90], adjusted P value: ConclusionA causal relationship exists between gut microbiota and Graves’ disease. Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella emerge as protective factors against Graves’ disease development. Prospective probiotic supplementation may offer a novel avenue for adjunctive treatment in the management of Graves’ disease in the future.</p

Table_1_Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella: emerging protectors against Graves’ disease.xlsx

BackgroundGraves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. Numerous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in the development of thyroid disorders. This study employs Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota in GD patients, aiming to offer novel insights into the etiology and treatment of Graves’ disease.MethodsTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess the causal relationship between Graves’ disease and the gut microbiota composition. Gut microbiota data were sourced from the international consortium MiBioGen, while Graves’ disease data were obtained from FINNGEN. Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Multiple analysis methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-RAPS, were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted employing MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis as quality control measures.ResultsThe Mendelian randomization study conducted in a European population revealed a decreased risk of Graves’ disease associated with Bacteroidaceae (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.89 ~ 0.90], adjusted P value: ConclusionA causal relationship exists between gut microbiota and Graves’ disease. Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella emerge as protective factors against Graves’ disease development. Prospective probiotic supplementation may offer a novel avenue for adjunctive treatment in the management of Graves’ disease in the future.</p

DataSheet_2_Unraveling the mystery: a Mendelian randomized exploration of gut microbiota and different types of obesity.pdf

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated the influence of gut microbiota on the development of obesity. In this study, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the gut microbiota characteristics among different types of obese patients, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and provide novel insights for obesity treatment.MethodsTwo-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess causal relationships between gut microbiota and various obesity subtypes. Gut microbiota data were obtained from the international consortium MiBioGen, and data on obese individuals were sourced from the Finnish National Biobank FinnGen. Eligible single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Various analytical methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, MR-RAPS, and Lasso regression, were applied. Sensitivity analyses for quality control included MR-Egger intercept tests, Cochran’s Q tests, and leave-one-out analyses and others.ResultsMendelian randomization studies revealed distinct gut microbiota profiles among European populations with different obesity subtypes. Following multivariable MR analysis, we found that Ruminococcaceae UCG010 [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.926, Adjusted P value: 0.028] independently reduced the risk of obesity induced by excessive calorie intake, while Butyricimonas [OR: 4.252, 95% CI: 2.177-8.307, Adjusted P value: 0.002] independently increased the risk of medication-induced obesity. For localized adiposity, Pasteurellaceae [OR: 0.213, 95% CI: 0.115-0.395, Adjusted P value: 0.05).ConclusionGut microbiota abundance is causally related to obesity, with distinct gut microbiota profiles observed among different obesity subtypes. Four bacterial species, including Ruminococcaceae UCG010, Butyricimonas, Pasteurellaceae and lactobacillus independently influence the development of various types of obesity. Probiotic and prebiotic supplementation may represent a novel approach in future obesity management.</p

DataSheet_4_Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella: emerging protectors against Graves’ disease.pdf

BackgroundGraves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. Numerous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in the development of thyroid disorders. This study employs Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota in GD patients, aiming to offer novel insights into the etiology and treatment of Graves’ disease.MethodsTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess the causal relationship between Graves’ disease and the gut microbiota composition. Gut microbiota data were sourced from the international consortium MiBioGen, while Graves’ disease data were obtained from FINNGEN. Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Multiple analysis methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-RAPS, were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted employing MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis as quality control measures.ResultsThe Mendelian randomization study conducted in a European population revealed a decreased risk of Graves’ disease associated with Bacteroidaceae (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.89 ~ 0.90], adjusted P value: ConclusionA causal relationship exists between gut microbiota and Graves’ disease. Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella emerge as protective factors against Graves’ disease development. Prospective probiotic supplementation may offer a novel avenue for adjunctive treatment in the management of Graves’ disease in the future.</p

DataSheet_3_Unraveling the mystery: a Mendelian randomized exploration of gut microbiota and different types of obesity.pdf

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated the influence of gut microbiota on the development of obesity. In this study, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the gut microbiota characteristics among different types of obese patients, aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and provide novel insights for obesity treatment.MethodsTwo-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess causal relationships between gut microbiota and various obesity subtypes. Gut microbiota data were obtained from the international consortium MiBioGen, and data on obese individuals were sourced from the Finnish National Biobank FinnGen. Eligible single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Various analytical methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, MR-RAPS, and Lasso regression, were applied. Sensitivity analyses for quality control included MR-Egger intercept tests, Cochran’s Q tests, and leave-one-out analyses and others.ResultsMendelian randomization studies revealed distinct gut microbiota profiles among European populations with different obesity subtypes. Following multivariable MR analysis, we found that Ruminococcaceae UCG010 [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.926, Adjusted P value: 0.028] independently reduced the risk of obesity induced by excessive calorie intake, while Butyricimonas [OR: 4.252, 95% CI: 2.177-8.307, Adjusted P value: 0.002] independently increased the risk of medication-induced obesity. For localized adiposity, Pasteurellaceae [OR: 0.213, 95% CI: 0.115-0.395, Adjusted P value: 0.05).ConclusionGut microbiota abundance is causally related to obesity, with distinct gut microbiota profiles observed among different obesity subtypes. Four bacterial species, including Ruminococcaceae UCG010, Butyricimonas, Pasteurellaceae and lactobacillus independently influence the development of various types of obesity. Probiotic and prebiotic supplementation may represent a novel approach in future obesity management.</p

DataSheet_3_Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella: emerging protectors against Graves’ disease.pdf

BackgroundGraves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. Numerous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in the development of thyroid disorders. This study employs Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota in GD patients, aiming to offer novel insights into the etiology and treatment of Graves’ disease.MethodsTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess the causal relationship between Graves’ disease and the gut microbiota composition. Gut microbiota data were sourced from the international consortium MiBioGen, while Graves’ disease data were obtained from FINNGEN. Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Multiple analysis methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-RAPS, were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted employing MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis as quality control measures.ResultsThe Mendelian randomization study conducted in a European population revealed a decreased risk of Graves’ disease associated with Bacteroidaceae (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.89 ~ 0.90], adjusted P value: ConclusionA causal relationship exists between gut microbiota and Graves’ disease. Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella emerge as protective factors against Graves’ disease development. Prospective probiotic supplementation may offer a novel avenue for adjunctive treatment in the management of Graves’ disease in the future.</p

DataSheet_1_Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella: emerging protectors against Graves’ disease.pdf

BackgroundGraves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated. Numerous studies have implicated the gut microbiota in the development of thyroid disorders. This study employs Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota in GD patients, aiming to offer novel insights into the etiology and treatment of Graves’ disease.MethodsTwo-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to assess the causal relationship between Graves’ disease and the gut microbiota composition. Gut microbiota data were sourced from the international consortium MiBioGen, while Graves’ disease data were obtained from FINNGEN. Eligible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables. Multiple analysis methods, including inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-RAPS, were utilized. Sensitivity analyses were conducted employing MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran’s Q test, and leave-one-out analysis as quality control measures.ResultsThe Mendelian randomization study conducted in a European population revealed a decreased risk of Graves’ disease associated with Bacteroidaceae (Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.89 ~ 0.90], adjusted P value: ConclusionA causal relationship exists between gut microbiota and Graves’ disease. Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Veillonella emerge as protective factors against Graves’ disease development. Prospective probiotic supplementation may offer a novel avenue for adjunctive treatment in the management of Graves’ disease in the future.</p