Physicochemical characteristics of citrus jelly with non cariogenic and functional sweeteners

In this study the effect of sweeteners with low glycemic index and non-cariogenic characteristics (isomaltulose, oligofructose and tagatose) in jelly prepared with citrus juice has been evaluated considering a citrus jelly formulated with sucrose as reference. The soluble solids, moisture content, pH, water activity, antioxidant capacity, optical and mechanical properties of jelly made using different sweeteners was determined during storage. Besides, mesophilic aerobics and moulds and yeasts was also counted to determine their stability over time. Sensory evaluation of the citrus jelly has also been done. The results showed the antioxidant activity decreased during storage in all formulations. Tagatose increased lightness whereas coordinates a*, b* and chrome of all the jellies prepared using new sweeteners were lower than jellies with sucrose. However, citrus jelly with only oligofructose or tagatose or with the mixture of isomaltulose and tagatose were most closely resembled to the control jelly with respect to mechanical properties. Jelly prepared with the combination of isomaltulose and tagatose in equal proportions obtained the best score in the sensorial analysis.The authors would like to thank the Serigo-Andres family for donating the raw materials, and also the GVA projects GV/2013/029, GV/2014/012 as well as the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Spain) for the financial support given to this research study (UPV PAID-06-12 SP20120889).Rubio-Arraez, S.; Capella Hernández, JV.; Castelló Gómez, ML.; Ortolá Ortolá, MD. (2016). Physicochemical characteristics of citrus jelly with non cariogenic and functional sweeteners. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 53(10):3642-3650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2319-4S364236505310Álvarez J, Pastoriza S, Alonso-Olalla R, Delgado-Andrade C, Rufián-Henares JA (2014) Nutritional and physicochemical characteristic of commercial Spanish citrus juices. Food Chem 164:396–405AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC international, 17th edn. Gaithersburg, MDCalzada-León R, Ruiz-Reyes ML, Altamirano-Bustamante N, Padrón-Martínez MM (2013) Features of the noncaloric sweeteners and their use in children. Acta Pediatr Méx 34(3):141–153Chacón-Villalobos A (2006) Current perspectives agribusiness oligofructosaccharides (FOS). Agron Mesoam 17(2):265–286De Oliva-Neto P, Menão PTP (2009) Isomaltulose production from sucrose by protaminobacter rubrum immobilized in calcium alginate. Bioresour Technol 100:252–4256de Queiroz Pane D, Dias CB, Meinhart AD, Ballus CA, Godoy HT (2015) Evaluation of the sweetener content in diet/light/zero foods and drinks by HPLC-DAD. J Food Sci Tech 52(11):6900–6913Edwards WP (2002) The science of goodies. Acribia S.A, SpainFood and Drug Administration (FDA) (2005) GRAS Notification Isomaltulose (PALATINOSE). http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagovfoodsgen/documents/document/ucm268989.pdf . Accessed 12 July 2015Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2010) GRAS Notification Tagatose. GRN No.352. http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-foods-gen/documents/document/ucm269560.pdf . Accessed 12 July 2015Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2011) GRAS Notification Oligofructose. GRN No.392. http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-foodsgen/documents/document/ucm277112.pdf . Accessed 12 July 2015GME (2015) Gelatine manufactured Europe gelatine properties. http://www.gelatine.org/en/about-gelatine/properties.html . Accessed 12 July 2015ISO (2003) Sensory analysis. Guidelines for the use of quantitative response scales [ref. no.ISO 4121:2003]. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaISO (2008) Sensory analysis Vocabulary [ref. no.ISO 5492:2008]. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaLedur MJ, Tessaro I, Zapata CP (2013) Physicochemical characterization of Saccharides Powder obtained from Yacon Roots (Smallanthus sonchifolius) by membrane technology. Braz Arch Biol Technol 56(6):1024–1033Levin GV (2002) Tagatose, the new GRAS sweetener and health product. J Med Food 5(1):23–36Lina BAR, Jonker G, Kozianowski G (2002) Isomaltulose (Palatinose review of biological and toxicologycal studies). Food Chem Toxicol 40(10):1375–1381O’Donnell K, Kearsley M (2012) Sweeteners and sugar alternatives in food technology, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterOh DK (2007) Tagatose: properties, applications, and biotechnological processes. Appl Microb Biotechnol 76(1):1–8Pacual MR, Calderón-Pascual V (2000) Food Microbiology. Analytical methodology for foods and drinks, 2nd edn. Diaz de Santos, MadridPeinado I, Rosa E, Heredia A, Andrés A (2012) Rheological characteristics of healthy sugar substituted spreadable strawberry product. J Food Eng 113(3):365–373Peinado I, Rosa E, Heredia A, Escriche I, Andrés A (2013) Optical, mechanical and sensorial properties of strawberry spreadable products formulated with isomaltulose. Food Bioprocess Tech 6(9):2353–2364Periche A, Heredia A, Escriche I, Andrés A, Castelló ML (2014) Optical, mechanical and sensory properties of based-isomaltulose gummy confections. Food Biosci 7:37–44Periche A, Heredia A, Escriche I, Andrés A, Castelló ML (2015a) Potential use of isomaltulose to produce healthier marshmallows. LWT-Food Sci Technol 62(1):605–612Periche Á, Castelló ML, Heredia A, Escriche I (2015b) Stevia rebaudiana, Oligofructose and isomaltulose as sugar replacers in Marshmallows: stability and antioxidant properties. J Food Process Preserv. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12653Petersen-Skytte U (2006) Tagatose. In: Mitchell H (ed) Sweeteners and sugar alternatives in food technology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 262–292Pimentel TC, Madrona GS, Prudencio SH (2015) Probiotic clarified apple juice with oligofructose or sucralose as sugar substitutes: sensory profile and acceptability. LWT–Food. Sci Technol 62(1):838–846Rababah TM, Al-Mahasneh MA, Kilani I, Yang W, Alhamad MN, Ereifeja E, Al-U’datta M (2011) Effect of jam processing and storage on total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and anthocyanins of different fruits. J Sci Food Agric 91:1096–1102Rubio-Arraez S, Sahuquillo S, Capella JV, Ortolá MD, Castelló ML (2015) Influence of healthy sweeteners (Tagatose and Oligofructose) on the physicochemical characteristics of orange marmalade. J Texture Stud 46(4):272–280Shahidi F, Liyana-Pathirana CM, Wall DS (2006) Antioxidant activity of white and black sesame seeds and their hull fractions. Food Chem 99(3):478–483Shukla V, Kandra P (2015) Development, physico-chemical and sensory evaluation of natural nutra candy. J Food Sci Tech Mys 52(11):7535–7539Taylor TP, Fasina O, Bell LN (2008) Physical properties and consumer liking of cookies prepared by replacing sucrose with tagatose. J Food Sci 73(3):145–151Van Den Heuvel EGHM, Muys T, Van Dokkum W, Schaafsma G (1999) Oligofructose stimulates calcium absorption in adolescents. Am J Clinic Nutr 69:544–548Vastenavond CM, Bertelsen H, Hansen SJ, Laursen RS, Saunders J, Eriknauer K (2012) Tagatose (D-tagatose). In: Nabors L (ed) Alternative sweeteners. Boca Ratón, Florida, USA, p 197–222Zeng Y, Zhang X, Guan Y, Sun Y (2012) Enzymatic hydrolysates from tuna backbone and the subsequent Maillard reaction with different ketohexoses. Int J Food Sci Technol 47:1293–130

Enhancing Free Cyanide Photocatalytic Oxidation by rGO/TiO2 P25 Composites

Graphene-TiO2 composites have been investigated in various photocatalytic reactions showing successful synergy compared to pristine TiO2. In the present work, graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized by the Hummers method and then reduced graphene oxide-TiO2 composites (rGO/TiO2) were obtained by an in situ GO photoreduction route. X-ray diffraction, FTIR, Raman, UV–vis DRS, and photoluminescence were the main characterization techniques. The obtained composites containing 1 and 3 wt.% rGO were evaluated in the cyanide (50 mg/L) oxidation and Au-cyanide complex (300 mg/L) degradation under UV-A light. The composites showed higher photocatalytic activity than TiO2, mainly with the 1% rGO content. Cyanate and gold nanoparticles, deposited on the photocatalyst’s surface, were the main byproducts during the photocatalyst assessment. The improved photocatalytic activity of the composites was attributed to a higher rate of electron transfer and a lower rate of charge recombination due to the chemical interaction of rGO with TiO2