3 research outputs found

    Utilisation of general practitioner telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic in regional Victoria, Australia (Preprint)

    No full text
    BACKGROUND In March 2020, the Australian Government expanded general practitioner (GP) telehealth services in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. OBJECTIVE This study sought to assess utilisation patterns of GP telehealth services in response to changing circumstances (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, with or without lockdown) in regional Victoria, Australia. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of monthly Medicare claims data from July 2019 to June 2021 from 140 regional GP practices in western Victoria. The longitudinal patterns of proportion of GP telehealth consultations stratified by type of consultation (videoconference vs. telephone) and by geographical, consumer and consultation characteristics were analysed. RESULTS Telehealth comprised 25.8% of GP consultations over the two-year period (n total = 2,025,615). After the introduction of the Australian telehealth expansion policy in March 2020, there was a rapid uptake in GP telehealth services (from 0% to 15% of all consultations), with a peak in August 2020 (55%). Thereafter, utilisation declined steadily to 31% in January 2021 and tapered off to 28% in June 2021. Telephone services and shorter consults were the most dominant form, and those aged 15-64 years had higher telehealth utilisation rates than younger or older age groups. The proportion of video consultations was higher during periods with government-imposed lockdown, and higher in the most socioeconomically advantaged areas compared to less socioeconomically advantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the continuation of telehealth use in rural and regional Australia post-pandemic. Future policy must identify mechanisms to reduce existing equity gaps in video consultations and consider patient- and system-level implications of the dominant use of short telephone consults. <br

    Improving Health Outcomes for People With Cancer in Rural and Regional Areas by Embedding Evidence-Based Smoking-Cessation Strategies Into Usual Care: A Study Protocol

    No full text
    Background: Smoking following a diagnosis of cancer is a powerful clinical risk indicator, with known poorer health outcomes and associated health care costs. In Australia, smoking rates are higher in rural and regional areas. There are established and effective interventions to promote smoking cessation after a diagnosis of cancer yet these are not in routine practice. Aim: This protocol paper reports on a study that aims to embed evidence-based smoking cessation strategies for people with cancer who are current smokers into routine care, resulting in in system wide improvements, an implemented program and model for further dissemination. Methods: Across three rural/regional sites, and with partners Quit Victoria and Western Alliance, this study employs a variety of methodologies to embed smoking cessation support to improve outcomes for people with cancer who currently smoke. Specifically, the project will embed a system of responsibilities and training in rural and regional health services to routinely engage people with cancer who smoke in support services. The program will: 路 Promote routine delivery of smoking cessation care by trained oncology staff (oncologists/nurses/ allied health) 路 Establish referral pathways to Quitline 路 Correspond with general practitioners, to: i) outline the benefits of quitting in this context, ii) promote access to nicotine replacement therapy and iii) support quitting in the community. 路 Improve routine recording of smoking status and documentation of provision of brief intervention (personalised advice given, resources provided) and outcomes. Participants: are oncology staff and general practitioners across three health services: Ballarat Health Service, East Grampians Health Service (Ararat), Wimmera Health Care Group (Horsham), all located in Victoria, Australia. Data collection will occur across four sources: 1) Oncology staff: qualitative and quantitative data collection understanding confidence and views on provision on cessation advice; 2) Monitoring Quitline calls, 3) Interview with local general practitioners and 4) Medical record reviews to explore frequency of recording of smoking status. Data will be collected pre/postintervention. Results: The project is underway with the intervention manuals in development. The project is due for completion in 2020. Conclusion: This project takes a health services approach to integration of smoking cessation support in routine care for people with cancer in rural and regional areas. This program of work has capacity to determine best approaches to integrate smoking cessation into routine care, resulting in reduced mortality and morbidity, improved effectiveness of anticancer treatments, and reduced health care costs; by establishing internationally relevant, embedded health care interventions
    corecore