9 research outputs found

    Systematic Investigation of Dust and Gaseous CO in 12 Nearby Molecular Clouds

    Full text link
    We report the first uniform and systematic study of dust and molecular gas in nearby molecular clouds. We use surveys of dust extinction and emission to determine the opacity and map the distribution of the dust within a dozen local clouds in order to derive a uniform set of basic cloud properties. We find: 1) the average dust opacity ⟨κd,353⟩=0.8 cm2 g−1\langle\kappa_{d,353}\rangle = 0.8\ {\rm cm^{2}\, g^{-1}} with variations of a factor of ∼\sim 2 between clouds, 2) cloud PDFs are exquisitely described by steeply falling power-laws with a narrow range of slope, and 3) a tight MGMC∼RGMC2M_{\rm GMC} \sim R_{\rm GMC}^2 scaling relation for the cloud sample, indicative of a cloud population with an exactingly constant average surface density above a common fixed boundary. We compare these results to uniformly analyzed CO surveys. We measure the CO mass conversion factors and assess the efficacy of CO for tracing the physical properties of molecular clouds. We find ⟨αCO⟩=4.31±0.67\langle \alpha_{\rm CO}\rangle = 4.31 \pm 0.67 M⊙_\odot (K km s−1^{-1} pc2^2)−1^{-1} (corresponding to XCOX_{\rm CO} = 1.97 ×\times 1020^{20} cm−2^{-2}(K km s−1^{-1})−1^{-1}). We demonstrate that CO observations are a poor tracer of column density and structure on sub-cloud spatial scales. On cloud scales, CO observations can provide measurements consistent with those of the dust, provided data are analyzed in a similar, self-consistent fashion. Measurements of average GMC surface density are sensitive to choice of cloud boundary. Care must be exercised to adopt common fixed boundaries when comparing surface densities for cloud populations within and between galaxies.Comment: 27 pages, 19 figures, 5 tables. Accepted ApJL. v2 Corrected bad coordinates on Appendix C maps. Brought text into alignment with final ApJL versio

    Not So Fast Kepler-1513: A Perturbing Planetary Interloper in the Exomoon Corridor

    Full text link
    Transit Timing Variations (TTVs) can be induced by a range of physical phenomena, including planet-planet interactions, planet-moon interactions, and stellar activity. Recent work has shown that roughly half of moons would induce fast TTVs with a short period in the range of two-to-four orbits of its host planet around the star. An investigation of the Kepler TTV data in this period range identified one primary target of interest, Kepler-1513 b. Kepler-1513 b is a 8.05−0.40+0.588.05^{+0.58}_{-0.40} R⊕R_\oplus planet orbiting a late G-type dwarf at 0.53−0.03+0.040.53^{+0.04}_{-0.03} AU. Using Kepler photometry, this initial analysis showed that Kepler-1513 b's TTVs were consistent with a moon. Here, we report photometric observations of two additional transits nearly a decade after the last Kepler transit using both ground-based observations and space-based photometry with TESS. These new transit observations introduce a previously undetected long period TTV, in addition to the original short period TTV signal. Using the complete transit dataset, we investigate whether a non-transiting planet, a moon, or stellar activity could induce the observed TTVs. We find that only a non-transiting perturbing planet can reproduce the observed TTVs. We additionally perform transit origami on the Kepler photometry, which independently applies pressure against a moon hypothesis. Specifically, we find that Kepler-1513 b's TTVs are consistent with an exterior non-transiting ∼\simSaturn mass planet, Kepler-1513 c, on a wide orbit, ∼\sim5%\% outside a 5:1 period ratio with Kepler-1513 b. This example introduces a previously unidentified cause for planetary interlopers in the exomoon corridor, namely an insufficient baseline of observations.Comment: 20 pages, 13 figures. Accepted to MNRAS. Code available at https://github.com/dyahalomi/Kepler151
    corecore