13 research outputs found
ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN GLOBALLY DISTRIBUTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES
The engagement of stakeholders in the project lifecycle is a key factor in the success of any project. Yet getting stakeholders engaged is a difficult task. The problem is further exacerbated when the software development project is globally distributed, mainly because of communication barriers between different stakeholders.
In this paper we describe multiple case studies where a wiki platform, together with specific working practices, enabled us to track the development process and the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement. The case studies were conducted by a consultancy team working with globally distributed teams.
The wiki platform was used to ensure timely responses from stakeholders through their ongoing active involvement in the process. Engagement was automatically measured using metrics based on wiki usage data. In the case studies, we quantitatively analyzed these metrics. These metrics serve as an indication of the engagement effectiveness and thereby also the likelihood of projects\u27 success, based on stakeholders\u27 behavior rather than attitude. We add qualitative examples to this analysis for illustrating the quality of stakeholders\u27 engagement. As opposed to the traditional approach that uses interviews and questionnaires, this automatic method measures stakeholder behavior rather than attitude.
By analyzing wiki usage data we are able to identify different work practices according to the users— consultants or stakeholders—who performed changes in the wiki, and we identify practices that generate effective stakeholder engagement and practices that do not.
In this paper we (1) define work practices for implementing effective stakeholder engagement and (2) develop metrics that automatically indicate the effectiveness of ongoing stakeholder engagement using the number of reads after a write
Open Source Projects as Incubators of Innovation: From Niche Phenomenon to Integral Part of the Software Industry
Technology and the Promise of Decentralization. Origins, Development, Patterns of Arguments
Predicting Functional Recovery and Quality of Life in Older Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Real-World Data From the International GOSAFE Study
PURPOSE The GOSAFE study evaluates risk factors for failing to achieve good quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery (FR) in older patients undergoing surgery for colon and rectal cancer.METHODS Patients age 70 years and older undergoing major elective colorectal surgery were prospectively enrolled. Frailty assessment was performed and outcomes, including QoL (EQ-5D-3L) recorded (3/6 months postoperatively). Postoperative FR was defined as a combination of Activity of Daily Living >= 5 + Timed Up & Go test <20 seconds + MiniCog >2.RESULTS Prospective complete data were available for 625/646 consecutive patients (96.9%; 435 colon and 190 rectal cancer), 52.6% men, and median age was 79.0 years (IQR, 74.6-82.9 years). Surgery was minimally invasive in 73% of patients (321/435 colon; 135/190 rectum). At 3-6 months, 68.9%-70.3% patients experienced equal/better QoL (72.8%-72.9% colon, 60.1%-63.9% rectal cancer). At logistic regression analysis, preoperative Flemish Triage Risk Screening Tool >= 2 (3-month odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.73; P = .034, 6-month OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.75; P = .027) and postoperative complications (3-month OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.42; P = .008, 6-month OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.15 to 5.68; P = .02) are associated with decreased QoL after colectomy. Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >= 2 is a strong predictor of postoperative QoL decline in the rectal cancer subgroup (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.45 to 9.92; P = .006). FR was reported by 254/323 (78.6%) patients with colon and 94/133 (70.6%) with rectal cancer. Charlson Age Comorbidity Index >= 7 (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.26 to 5.32; P = .009), ECOG >= 2 (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.36 to 7.20; P = .007 colon; OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.45 to 14.63; P = .009 rectal surgery), severe complications (OR, 17.33; 95% CI, 7.30 to 40.8; P < .001), fTRST >= 2 (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.40 to 5.25; P = .003), and palliative surgery (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.29 to 13.07; P = .017) are risk factors for not achieving FR.CONCLUSION The majority of older patients experience good QoL and stay independent after colorectal cancer surgery. Predictors for failing to achieve these essential outcomes are now defined to guide patients' and families' preoperative counseling