Lysine 91 is the main SUMOylation site of Nurr1.

<p>(A) Schematic representation of full-length HA-Nurr1, and truncated isoforms HA-Nurr1ΔAF-2 (amino acids 1–353) and HA-Nurr1ΔAF-1 (amino acids 262–598). (B, C) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1ΔAF-2 or HA-Nurr1ΔAF-1, plus Ubc9 and SUMO-2 were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and proteins analyzed with anti-HA (B) and anti-Nurr1 (C) antibodies. (D) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with wild type HA-Nurr1 or the point mutants HA-Nurr1-K74R or HA-Nurr1-K91R were fractionated in SDS-PAGE. Western blot was performed with an anti-HA antibody.</p

SUMOylation on lysine 91 does not modify Nurr1 half-life and location.

<p>(A) HEK293 cells were transfected with HA-Nurr1 or HA-Nurr1-K91R. Twelve hours after transfection the cells were treated with cycloheximide and harvested at the indicated hours. Total extracts were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blots developed with anti-HA and anti-actin (load control) antibodies. Densitometric analysis of 3 independent experiments was performed with Image J software. Data is expressed as percentage of HA-Nurr1 or HA-Nurr1-K91R expression at cero time and correspond to the mean ± S.E.M. (B) Representative western blots of HA-Nurr1 and HA-Nurr1-K91R during cycloheximide treatment. (C) PC12 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids. Fixed cells were subjected to double immunofluorescence protocols using HA and PIASγ antibodies. Alexa 594 (red) second antibody was used to visualize HA and Alexa 488 (green) second antibody was used to visualize PIASγ. Cells were examined by deconvolution microscopy. (D) Colocalization of Nurr1 or the mutant Nurr1-K91R with PIASγ using van-Steensel analysis <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0055035#pone.0055035-vanSteensel1" target="_blank">[19]</a>.</p

Lysine 91 of Nurr1 is in a synergy control (SC) motif.

<p>(A) Consensus SC motif <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0055035#pone.0055035-IiguezLluh1" target="_blank">[14]</a> and putative Nurr1 SC motif. (B) HEK293 cells were transfected with 100 ng of 1NBRE-Luc (one NBRE element), 3NBRE-Luc (three NBRE elements) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0055035#pone.0055035-Woronicz1" target="_blank">[15]</a> or NBRE-3X-tk-LUC (three NBRE elements) <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0055035#pone.0055035-Castro1" target="_blank">[5]</a> reporters and equimolar amounts of HA-Nurr1 or point mutant HA-Nurr1-K91R. Cells were harvested 48 hours post-transfection and lysates assayed for luciferase activity. Results are expressed as fold of induction related to control (pCGN, empty vector) and correspond to the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent assays performed each in triplicate. Scale in left axis is for 1NBRE-Luc and 3NBRE-Luc reporters' activity, and scale in right axis is for NBRE-3X-tk-LUC reporter activity. Statistical significance was estimated by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test *p<0.05 (HA-Nurr1-K91R v/s HA-Nurr1). (C) HEK293cells were transfected with 100 ng of 1NBRE-Luc or 3NBRE-Luc reporters and equimolar amounts of HA-Nurr1ΔAF-2 or point mutant HA-Nurr1ΔAF-2-K91R. Cells were harvested 48 hours post-transfection and lysate assayed for luciferase activity. Results are expressed as fold of induction related to control (pCGN) and correspond to the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent assays performed each in triplicate.</p

Point mutant PIASγC342A fails to SUMOylate Nurr1.

<p>(A) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1, SUMO-2 and PIASγ or the point mutant PIASγC342A were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blot assays performed with anti-HA (upper), anti-PIASγ (middle) and anti-SUMO-2 (bottom) antibodies. (B) HEK293cells were transfected with 100 ng of NBRE-3X-tk-LUC reporter and equimolar amounts of HA-Nurr1, PIASγ or PIASγC342A. Cells were harvested 48 hours post transfection and lysates assayed for luciferase activity. Results are expressed as fold of induction related to control (pcDNA3.1+) and correspond to the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent assays performed each in triplicate. Statistical significance was estimated by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. *p<0.05 (Nurr1+PIASγ v/s Nurr1) and (Nurr1+ PIASγC342A v/s Nurr1). In the bottom, western blots showing the expression of recombinant proteins and actin used as loading control.</p

Nurr1 is SUMOylated by SUMO-2.

<p>(A) Schematic representation of Nurr1 (bottom) showing the position of four putative SUMOylation sites according with SUMOplot^TM software analysis (middle). The table shows the sequences of the potential SUMOylation sites of rat Nurr1 sorted from the highest score. Putative SUMO acceptor lysines (K) are highlighted, and potential SUMO sites are underlined. (B) COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing HA-Nurr1, Ubc9, and SUMO-1, SUMO-2 or SUMO-3. Cells were harvested 48 hours post-transfection and lysed directly in loading buffer containing the SUMO-isopeptidase inhibitor N-ethylmaleimide 20 mM, and fractionated in SDS-PAGE. Representative western-blot with anti-HA (upper) and anti-SUMO-2 (bottom) antibodies. (C) Quantitative densitometry analysis of Nurr1-SUMO-2 signal described in (B), using Image J software. Data correspond to the mean ± S.E.M. of 3 independent experiments for each condition. Statistical significance was estimated by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. * p<0.05 (Nurr1+Ubc9+SUMO-2 v/s Nurr1). (D) Total lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1, Ubc9 and SUMO-2 were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Nurr1 antibody or control IgG. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed in western blots with anti-HA antibody. Bands for immunoglobulin are indicated as IgG heavy chain (H).</p

PIASγ enhances Nurr1 SUMOylation.

<p>(A) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with plasmids encoding HA-Nurr1, SUMO-2 and PIASγ were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blots were performed with anti-HA (upper), anti-SUMO-2 (middle) and anti-PIASγ (bottom) antibodies. (B) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected as in (A) were immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted with a monoclonal (m) anti-HA antibody. (C) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1, SUMO-2, PIASγ and Flag-SENP1 or Flag-SENP1-DN were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blots were performed with the indicated antibodies. (D) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1 or the point mutants HA-Nurr1-K74R or HA-Nurr1-K91R were fractionated in SDS-PAGE. Western blots were performed with an anti-HA antibody. (E, F) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1 or HA-Nurr1-K91R plus SUMO-2 and PIASγ were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody and western blot carried out with anti-Nurr1 antibody (E) or immunoprecipitated with anti-Nurr1 antibody and western blot carried out with anti-HA antibody (F). (m): monoclonal, (H): IgG heavy chain.</p

PIASγ requires the ₂₀LXXLL₂₄ motif to interact, SUMOylate and repress Nurr1.

<p>(A) Schematic representation of full-length PIASγ indicating functional domains SAP: <i>Scaffold Attachment factor-A/B acinus and PIAS</i>; the PINIT domain; SP<i>-</i>(<i>Siz/PIAS</i>)<i>-</i>RING and SIM: <i>SUMO Interaction Motif</i>. PIASγ has two LXXLL motifs. Mutations changing leucines (L) by alanines (A) in each LXXLL domain are depicted for GST-PIASγmut1 and GST-PIASγmut2. (B) GST, GST-PIASγ, GST-PIASγmut1 and GST-PIASγmut2 retained in glutathione-agarose beads were incubated with extracts from COS-1 cells transfected with Myc-Nurr1_363–598. Retained proteins were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blot developed with anti-Myc monoclonal antibody, revealing that only GST-PIASγ and GST-PIASγmut2 are able to interact with Nurr1. Recombinant GST-PIASγ proteins were equally loaded in each GST-pull down assays as shown by western blot using anti-PIASγ antibody (bottom). (C) Luciferase reporter assay showing that full-length PIASγmut1 lose repressor capacity over Nurr1 transactivity. HEK293 cells were transfected with the NBRE-3X-tk-LUC along with HA-Nurr1, PIASγ or PIASγmut1. After 48 hours, cells extracts were assayed for luciferase activity. Data are expressed as percentage of Nurr1 transactivation and correspond to the mean ± S.E.M of 4 independent experiments each performed in triplicates. Statistical significance was estimated by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. *p<0.05 (Nurr1+PIASγ v/s Nurr1+PIASγmut1). In the bottom, western blots showing the expression of recombinant proteins and actin used as loading control. (D) Total extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with HA-Nurr1, SUMO-2 and PIASγ or PIASγmut1 were fractionated in SDS-PAGE and western blots performed with anti-HA, anti-PIASγ and actin (load control) antibodies.</p

Decreased Expression of CoREST1 and CoREST2 Together with LSD1 and HDAC1/2 during Neuronal Differentiation

<div><p><u>C</u>oREST (CoREST1, <i>rcor1</i>) transcriptional corepressor together with the histone demethylase <u>L</u>SD1 (KDM1A) and the histone deacetylases <u>H</u>DAC1/2 form LSD1-CoREST-HDAC (LCH) transcriptional complexes to regulate gene expression. CoREST1 belong to a family that also comprises CoREST2 (<i>rcor2</i>) and CoREST3 (<i>rcor3</i>). CoREST1 represses the expression of neuronal genes during neuronal differentiation. However, the role of paralogs CoREST2 and CoREST3 in this process is just starting to emerge. Here, we report the expression of all CoRESTs and partners LSD1 and HDAC1/2 in two models of neuronal differentiation: Nerve-Growth-Factor (NGF)-induced neuronal phenotype of PC12 cells, and <i>in vitro</i> maturation of embryonic rat cortical neurons. In both models, a concomitant and gradual decrease of LSD1, HDAC1, HDAC2, CoREST1, and CoREST2, but not CoREST3 was observed. As required by the study, full-length rat <i>rcor1</i> gene was identified using <i>in silico</i> analysis of available rat genome. The work was also complemented by the analysis of rat RNA-seq databases. The analysis showed that all CoRESTs, including the identified four splicing variants of rat CoREST3, display a wide expression in adult tissues. Moreover, the analysis of RNA-seq databases showed that CoREST2 displays a higher expression than CoREST1 and CoREST3 in the mature brain. Immunofluorescent assays and immunoblots of adult rat brain showed that all CoRESTs are present in both glia and neurons. Regarding functional partnership, CoREST2 and CoREST3 interact with all LSD1 splicing variants. In conclusion, neuronal differentiation is accompanied by decreased expression of all core components of LCH complexes, but not CoREST3. The combination of the differential transcriptional repressor capacity of LCH complexes and variable protein levels of its different components should result in a finely tuned gene expression during neuronal differentiation and in the adult brain.</p></div

<i>rcor1-3</i> transcripts expression profile across rat tissues.

<p>The panel shows the expression levels (measured in FPKM) of <i>rcor1-3</i> genes (A) and <i>rcor3</i> isoforms (B) in the different rat tissues analyzed.</p

CoREST2 and CoREST3 interact with all LSD1 isoforms.

<p>HEK293-T cells were co-transfected with myc-CoREST2 (myc-CoR2) or myc-CoREST3 (myc-CoR3) and HA-LSD1 isoforms (LSD1; LSD1-2a; LSD1-8a; LSD1 2a/8a). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, cells were harvested and total protein extract was immunoprecipitated with the indicated HA antibodies (m: monoclonal; p: policlonal) or IgG (control). Immunoblots were performed with anti-myc or anti-HA antibodies, as indicated.</p