Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of immunoglobulin exposure with varying dosing intervals of subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20% (Ig20Gly) in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases

Background Immunoglobulin (IG) replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID) can be administered daily to every 2 weeks subcutaneously (SCIG) or every 3 or 4 weeks intravenously (IVIG). Objectives Develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model simulating IG exposure with Ig20Gly, a 20% SCIG; determine the dose adjustment factor for Ig20Gly relative to IVIG. Methods Data from patients with PID treated with Ig20Gly and IVIG 10% were used to characterize IG population PK by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling and validated using data splitting and a visual predictive check. IG profiles were simulated for 1000 patients/interval treated with Ig20Gly (daily, every 2 days, every 3 days, twice weekly, weekly, every 2 weeks). An Ig20Gly adjustment factor of 130% was used to simulate Ig20Gly to IVIG AUC ratios for weekly or every 2 weeks Ig20Gly dosing intervals and a monthly IVIG dosing interval. Results A 1-compartment model, using weight as a covariate on clearance, derived from an index modeling dataset (n = 81) demonstrated predictability for a validation dataset (n = 21). The model estimate of bioavailability was 73.9%. Simulations for 6 dosing intervals showed similar mean profiles with overlapping prediction intervals. Mean AUC ratios of Ig20Gly to IVIG with a dose adjustment factor of 1.30:1 were 98.7% for weekly and 97.7% for twice-weekly administration demonstrating comparable exposure. Conclusion Ig20Gly exposures from daily to up to every 2 weeks appeared equivalent. A 1.30 conversion factor provided coverage comparable to IVIG when Ig20Gly is administered daily to every 2 weeks

Tolerability of subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20%, Ig20Gly, in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Aim: To assess Ig20Gly tolerability in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Patients & methods: Infusion parameters and tolerability were analyzed in pediatric patients (aged 2-5 years [n=6], 6-11 years [n=22] and 12-17 years [n=22]) receiving Ig20Gly in two Phase II/III trials. Results: Of 2624 Ig20Gly infusions, >99% did not require any rate reduction, interruption or discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Median maximum infusion rates and volumes/site were higher in patients 12-17 years of age (30ml/h/site; 30ml/site) versus 6-11 years (20ml/h/site; 15ml/site) and 2-5 years (18ml/h/site; 14ml/site). Rates of causally related systemic and local AEs (0.009 and 0.063 AEs/infusion) were low. Conclusion: Ig20Gly infused at relatively high rates and volumes was well tolerated in children

Cutaneous infection by Mycobacterium haemophilum and kansasii in an IgA-deficient man

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevalence of infections by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has steadily increased over the past decades, especially in immunocompromised patients.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We present a patient with IgA-deficiency and mixed cutaneous infection by two slowly growing mycobacteria, <it>Mycobacterium </it>(<it>M.</it>) <it>haemophilum </it>and <it>M. kansasii.</it></p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Cutaneous <it>M. haemophilum </it>infections most often result from HIV or transplantation-associated immunosuppression. Rarely, <it>M. haemophilum </it>may also infect healthy patients or iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients without transplantation. <it>M. kansasii </it>is one of the most frequent NTM and large awareness exists about its involvement in human diseases. Mycobacterial diagnosis of cutaneous infections should be considered in long-lasting skin lesions.</p

Selective IgA Deficiency

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency is the most common primary immunodeficiency defined as decreased serum level of IgA in the presence of normal levels of other immunoglobulin isotypes. Most individuals with IgA deficiency are asymptomatic and identified coincidentally. However, some patients may present with recurrent infections of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, allergic disorders, and autoimmune manifestations. Although IgA is the most abundant antibody isotype produced in the body, its functions are not clearly understood. Subclass IgA1 in monomeric form is mainly found in the blood circulation, whereas subclass IgA2 in dimeric form is the dominant immunoglobulin in mucosal secretions. Secretory IgA appears to have prime importance in immune exclusion of pathogenic microorganisms and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. Despite this critical role, there may be some compensatory mechanisms that would prevent disease manifestations in some IgA-deficient individuals. In IgA deficiency, a maturation defect in B cells to produce IgA is commonly observed. Alterations in transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor gene appear to act as disease-modifying mutations in both IgA deficiency and common variable immunodeficiency, two diseases which probably lie in the same spectrum. Certain major histocompatibility complex haplotypes have been associated with susceptibility to IgA deficiency. The genetic basis of IgA deficiency remains to be clarified. Better understanding of the production and function of IgA is essential in elucidating the disease mechanism in IgA deficiency

Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (ITAC): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Passive immunotherapy using hyperimmune intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG) to SARS-CoV-2, derived from recovered donors, is a potential rapidly available, specific therapy for an outbreak infection such as SARS-CoV-2. Findings from randomised clinical trials of hIVIG for the treatment of COVID-19 are limited. METHODS: In this international randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who had been symptomatic for up to 12 days and did not have acute end-organ failure were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either hIVIG or an equivalent volume of saline as placebo, in addition to remdesivir, when not contraindicated, and other standard clinical care. Randomisation was stratified by site pharmacy; schedules were prepared using a mass-weighted urn design. Infusions were prepared and masked by trial pharmacists; all other investigators, research staff, and trial participants were masked to group allocation. Follow-up was for 28 days. The primary outcome was measured at day 7 by a seven-category ordinal endpoint that considered pulmonary status and extrapulmonary complications and ranged from no limiting symptoms to death. Deaths and adverse events, including organ failure and serious infections, were used to define composite safety outcomes at days 7 and 28. Prespecified subgroup analyses were carried out for efficacy and safety outcomes by duration of symptoms, the presence of anti-spike neutralising antibodies, and other baseline factors. Analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all randomly assigned participants who met eligibility criteria and received all or part of the assigned study product infusion. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04546581. FINDINGS: From Oct 8, 2020, to Feb 10, 2021, 593 participants (n=301 hIVIG, n=292 placebo) were enrolled at 63 sites in 11 countries; 579 patients were included in the mITT analysis. Compared with placebo, the hIVIG group did not have significantly greater odds of a more favourable outcome at day 7; the adjusted OR was 1·06 (95% CI 0·77–1·45; p=0·72). Infusions were well tolerated, although infusion reactions were more common in the hIVIG group (18·6% vs 9·5% for placebo; p=0·002). The percentage with the composite safety outcome at day 7 was similar for the hIVIG (24%) and placebo groups (25%; OR 0·98, 95% CI 0·66–1·46; p=0·91). The ORs for the day 7 ordinal outcome did not vary for subgroups considered, but there was evidence of heterogeneity of the treatment effect for the day 7 composite safety outcome: risk was greater for hIVIG compared with placebo for patients who were antibody positive (OR 2·21, 95% CI 1·14–4·29); for patients who were antibody negative, the OR was 0·51 (0·29–0·90; pinteraction=0·001). INTERPRETATION: When administered with standard of care including remdesivir, SARS-CoV-2 hIVIG did not demonstrate efficacy among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 without end-organ failure. The safety of hIVIG might vary by the presence of endogenous neutralising antibodies at entry. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health

Steady-State Serum IgG Trough Levels Are Adequate for Pharmacokinetic Assessment in Patients with Immunodeficiencies Receiving Subcutaneous Immune Globulin.

Patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases often require lifelong immunoglobulin (IG) therapy. Most clinical trials investigating IG therapies characterize serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles by serially assessing serum IgG levels. This retrospective analysis evaluated whether steady-state serum IgG trough level measurement alone is adequate for PK assessment. Based on individual patient serum IgG trough levels from two pivotal trials (phase 2/3 European [NCT01412385] and North American [NCT01218438]) of weekly 20% subcutaneous IG (SCIG; Cuvitru, Ig20Gly), trough level-predicted IgG AUC (AUCτ,tp) were calculated and compared with the reported AUC calculated from serum IgG concentration-time profiles (AUCτ). In both studies, mean AUCτ,tp values for Ig20Gly were essentially equivalent to AUCτ with point estimates of geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUCτ,tp/AUCτ near 1.0 and 90% CIs within 0.80-1.25. In contrast, for IVIG, 10%, mean AUCτ,tp values were lower than AUCτ by &gt;20%, (GMR [90% CI]: 0.74 [0.70-0.78] and 0.77 [0.73-0.81] for the two studies, respectively). Mean AUCτ,tp values calculated for 4 other SCIG products (based on mean IgG trough levels reported in the literature/labels) were also essentially equivalent to the reported AUCτ (differences &lt;10% for all except HyQvia, a facilitated SCIG product), while differences for IVIG products were &gt;20%. In conclusion, steady-state serum IgG levels following weekly SCIG remain stable, allowing for reliable prediction of AUC over the dosing interval using trough IgG levels. These findings indicate that measuring steady-state serum IgG trough levels alone may be adequate for PK assessment of weekly SCIG

Effects of Body Mass and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous or Hyaluronidase-facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.

PURPOSE: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIG (fSCIG) therapy across body mass index (BMI) and age categories in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) previously treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). METHODS: Using our previously published integrated population PK model based on data from eight clinical trials, simulations were conducted to examine the effects of BMI and age on serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) PK after administration of SCIG 0.15&nbsp;g/kg weekly or fSCIG 0.6&nbsp;g/kg every 4&nbsp;weeks in patients switching from stable IVIG. Patients were assumed to have baseline IgG trough concentrations of 7&nbsp;g/L (hypothetical protective threshold). RESULTS: Mean steady-state serum IgG trough values (Cmin,ss or trough) increased with BMI and age. Mean Cmin,ss was 18% (SCIG) and 16% (fSCIG) higher in the obese than the healthy BMI group. Pediatric patients aged &lt; 18 years had 8-22% (SCIG) and 4-20% (fSCIG) lower mean Cmin,ss values than adults, with the youngest group (2- &lt; 6&nbsp;years) having the lowest Cmin,ss. All patients across populations maintained Cmin,ss IgG concentrations of ≥ 7&nbsp;g/L after switching to SCIG or fSCIG. CONCLUSION: Both SCIG and fSCIG successfully maintained trough values at or above the hypothetical protective threshold after switching from stable IVIG, irrespective of BMI or age. Differences in trough values between BMI groups&nbsp;and age groups (≤ 22%) may not warrant SCIG or fSCIG dose adjustments based on BMI or age alone; instead, the dosing paradigm should be guided by prior IVIG dose, individual IgG monitoring, and clinical findings