18 research outputs found

    Lessons from the 1997 and 2008 Crises in Korea

    Get PDF

    Early warning system for financial crisis

    No full text

    Monetary policy In Korea

    No full text

    2015 ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋ฐœ์ „๊ฒฝํ—˜๋ชจ๋“ˆํ™”์‚ฌ์—… : ๊ธˆ์œต์œ„๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ธฐ๊ฒฝ๋ณด์‹œ์Šคํ…œ

    No full text
    Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 National Early Warning System in Korea 1. Structure of the Systemยท 2. KCIFโ€™s Early Warning System 3. FSS and Financial Industry EWS 4. EWS for Financial Markets 5. EWS for Real Estate Market 6. EWS for Petroleum and Commodity 7. EWS for Labor Market Chapter 3 EWS for Currency Crisis 1. Methodology: Signal Approach 2. Applications Chapter 4 EWS for Financial Industry and Institutions 1. Daily Financial Soundness Indicators 2. Early Warning Models of the FSS 3. CAEL Rating System 4. Macroprudential Indicators Chapter 5 Policy Recommendations for EWS 1. Qualitative Monitoring 2. Other Policy Recommendationsยท Chapter 6 Capital Flows and Crisis Prevention Policy 1. Foreign Exchange Policy 2. Prudential Regulations 3. Capital Controls 4. Sovereign Wealth Fund 5. Bilateral Swaps and Global Financial Safety Nets (GFSNs) Chapter 7 Conclusion References Appendice

    Financial Constraints, Debt Capacity, and the Cross-section of Stock Returns

    No full text
    Building on a model of corporate investment under collateral constraints, we develop and test a hypothesis on the differential effect of debt capacity on stock returns across financially constrained and unconstrained firms. Consistent with the hypothesis, we find that debt capacity is a significant determinant of stock returns only in the cross-section of financially constrained firms, after controlling for beta, size, book-to-market, leverage, and momentum. The findings suggest that cross-sectional differences in corporate investment behavior arising from financial constraints, predicted by theories of imperfect capital markets and supported by empirical evidence, are reflected in the stock returns of manufacturing firms. Copyright (c) 2009 the American Finance Association.

    ์€ํ–‰ ์ž๊ธฐ์ž๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœ์‘์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ๋น„๊ต๋ถ„์„๊ณผ Basel โ…ก์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ 

    No full text
    This paper investigates the cyclical patterns of buffer capital using an unbalanced panel data for the banks in 30 OECD countries and 7 non-OECD Asian countries. We test whether the relationships between buffer capital and business cycle are systematically different across country groups controlling for other potential determinants of bank capital. We find that the correlation is positive for developed countries while it is negative for Asian developing countries. These findings suggest that, once Basel II is implemented, developing countries are more likely to observe an increase in output volatility. We then review the policy recommendations to mitigate the procyclicality problem of Basel II. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” 30๊ฐœ OECD ํšŒ์›๊ตญ๊ณผ 7๊ฐœ ์•„์‹œ์•„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์€ํ–‰๋“ค์˜ ์žฌ๋ฌด์ œํ‘œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ๋ถˆ๊ท ํ˜• ํŒจ๋„์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์€ํ–‰ ์ž๊ธฐ์ž๋ณธ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœํ™˜์  ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์€ํ–‰์˜ ์ž‰์—ฌ์ž๋ณธ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœํ™˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ž๊ธฐ์ž๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ›„์—๋„ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ฃน๋ณ„๋กœ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ฆ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์„ ์ง„๊ตญ ์€ํ–‰๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž‰์—ฌ์ž๋ณธ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœํ™˜ ๊ฐ„์— ์–‘(+)์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์•„์‹œ์•„ ๊ฐœ๋„๊ตญ ์€ํ–‰๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž‰์—ฌ์ž๋ณธ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœํ™˜ ๊ฐ„์— ์Œ(-)์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์‹ ๋ฐ”์ ค์ž๊ธฐ์ž๋ณธํ˜‘์•ฝ(Basel โ…ก)์ด ๋„์ž…๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐœ๋„๊ตญ์—์„œ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ๋”์šฑ ํ™•๋Œ€๋  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์€ํ–‰๋Œ€์ถœ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ์ˆœ์‘์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ๋…์ •์ฑ… ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ๋“ค์„ ์ ๊ฒ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.2

    Macroprudential Foreign Exchange Policy in Mongolia

    No full text
    Mongolia is a country with a large mineral wealth and great growth potential. As the Mongolian economy heavily depends on the production and export of minerals, it is inevitable for Mongolia to be vulnerable to external shocks. The changes in the demand for minerals and the associated changes in the prices of minerals in the global market directly affect the mining sector and ultimately the balance of payments, the government budget balance, and the growth rate of the Mongolian economy. External shocks to the economy also directly affect the capital flows. The volatile capital flows, along with the swings of commodity prices, generate a boom-bust cycle, and given the mineral-centric structure of the Mongolian economy, small shocks in the world commodity market may have substantial impacts on the Mongolian economy following the changes in external conditions. Indeed, the Mongolian economy witnessed a decrease in the net capital inflows between 2012 and 2016. In particular, the net capital inflows of direct investments were USD 5.2 billion in 2012, but the direct investments turned into the net capital outflow of USD 4.4 billion in 2016. The crash of the foreign direct investments mainly resulted from the delay of the second phase development of the Oyu Tolgoi (OT) after the end of the first phase. In fact, the sudden fall of the foreign direct investments caused an economic turmoil in the Mongolian economy. In response to these adverse external shocks, the Mongolian government and the Bank of Mongolia conducted expansionary fiscal and monetary policies to support growth. These expansionary policies, however, also caused side effects such as a rapid credit growth, deterioration of bank balance sheets, and an unsustainably high public debt. The large mining investments required external financing, leading to a large current account deficit and a deterioration in the net international investment position. In 2012 and 2013, when the investment rates were high, the current account deficit recorded at โ€“43% to -44% of GDP. The cumulative current account deficits resulted in a rapidly growing external debt. The external debt to GDP ratio, in fact, increased from 99.1 percent in 2010 to 220.9 percent in 2019. At the same time, the foreign exchange reserves decreased sharply from USD 4.1 billion in 2012 to USD 1.3 billion in 2015 and 2016. This large external debt and small international reserves require immediate policy responses. Given the large external imbalances and weak prudential regulations in Mongolia, a sound management for external debts and capital flow should be the primary policy goal for the Mongolian goverment. The basic premise is to accumulate a financial buffer in order to strengthen resilience of the economy by conducting counter-cyclical macroprudential foreign exchange policies. For Mongolia to achieve this goal, several recommendations are suggested.2019/20 KSP with Mongolia Executive Summary Chapter 1 Macro Stabilization Policy through Fiscal and Monetary Policy Mix Chapter 2 Improvement of Fiscal Stabilization Rules in Mongolia Chapter 3 Macroprudential Foreign Exchange Policy in Mongolia Chapter 4 Building Macroeconomic Modeling and Capacity Enhancement for ForecastingTRU
    corecore