Reflective Responsibility

Here, we are helped by understanding that responsbility is built into our very being as humans. We are the "responsible" animal. We do not simply "respond," as do other animals to their environments, their enemies, their lusts. We are given what Mudge calls the "gift" of responsibility: we can assess and plan and be accountable; we can take responsiblity for our responses; we can think through what is demanded by the situation; we can place that situation into broader and broader frameworks; we can analyze our own feelings and reactions so that they do not have the same hold over us that they would otherwise have. In all of these ways, we can be reflectively responsible

Response to Frederic Bretzner et al. “Target Populations for First-In-Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Spinal Cord Injury”

We address concerns raised in this issue by Bretzner et al. (2011) by explaining the rationale for including subjects with subacute, neurologically complete spinal cord injuries in the Phase 1 trial of GRNOPC1. We also present elements of the informed consent process that minimize the likelihood of therapeutic misconception

Issues of the Ends of Life: The Segelberg Series

The Segelberg Series explores the intersection of religious faith and public policy. This book contains the lectures focused on The Ends of Life. Dalhousie University’s School of Public Administration managed the series through a lecture committee under the able leadership of the former Dean of Dalhousie’s Law School, Professor Innis Christie, QC

Teori-teori keadilan: analisis kritis pemikiran

viii, 338 h

Teori teori keadilan; Six Theories of Justice suplemen : konsep keadilan dalam kristen, oleh Hans Kelsen

338 hal.; bibl.; 19 c

Teori-teori keadilan: analisis kritis terhadap pemikiran

vii, 338 h

Teori-Teori Keadilan

vii, 340 hlm.; 21 cm