7 research outputs found

    RPM Scores associated to the bullying victim categories (χ<sup>2</sup> distances).

    No full text
    <p>Positive and higher values of χ<sup>2</sup> distances are indicative of and strong association. Negative score are indicative of a lack of association.</p

    The relation between RPM and psychosocial outcome (drug intake, violence, self-esteem and mental health).

    No full text
    <p>(a) RPM scores and annual prevalence of drug intake (%). (b) RPM scores and annual prevalence's percentages of moderate (MPV) and intense physical violence (IPV). (C) RPM scores and self-esteem (Means and <i>S.D</i>.). RPM score and perceived mental health (Means and <i>S.D.</i>). In each subfigure (a, b, c, d), RPM measures of fluid intelligence are presented from left (Higher levels of intelligence) to right (Lower levels of intelligence).</p

    Population and random sampling for the countries diagnosed.

    No full text
    <p><i>n</i> = Sample achieved, <i>N</i> = Population. The table grade range (5 to 8th) represents the Chilean academic curricula including student of eight- to thirteen-year olds approximately.</p

    RPM's five level score relating fluid intelligence with psychosocial adaptation.

    No full text
    <p>The scoring was based on previous standardized studies reported in Chile in a sample of 4258 students (Ivanovic et al. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024858#pone.0024858-Ivanovic1" target="_blank">[6]</a>). Using this parameter a relatively normal participant distribution was observed in our five score levels: Score 1: 5.3%; Score 2:19.4%; Score 3: 48.2%; Score 4:19.9; Score 5: 7.2%.</p
    corecore