36 research outputs found

    US-Guided Biopsies: Overarching Principles

    Get PDF
    Gathering synovial tissue from any swollen joint especially in early arthritis patients is critical for good quality research and to obtain further insight into the pathophysiology of inflammatory joint diseases. Multiplying biopsy sites is a challenge in terms of the techniques needed for each different joint but also in terms of safety and tolerability. It is important to provide the best care especially in very early arthritis patients who have only had the disease for a few months. This review discusses the minimal requirements applying to antiseptic techniques for the operator's hands, patient preparation, local anesthesia, and post-procedure care

    Ultrasound-Guided Synovial Biopsies of Wrists, Metacarpophalangeal, Metatarsophalangeal, Interphalangeal Joints, and Tendon Sheaths

    Get PDF
    Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy (UGSB) is a minimally-invasive procedure which allows quality synovial tissue retrieval. In this article, we will discuss overarching principles of the procedure performed in wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), metatarsophalangeal (MTP), interphalangeal joints (IP), and tendon sheaths, including basic sonoanatomy, entry site and biopsy technique, as well as special considerations for each structure whenever relevant

    Standardisation of synovial biopsy analyses in rheumatic diseases: a consensus of the EULAR Synovitis and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Groups

    Get PDF
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of the ninth author’s name. Incorrect spelling: Soeren Andreas Just. Correct spelling: Søren Andreas Just. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.Background: The aim of this global collaboration was to develop a consensual set of items for the analysis of synovial biopsies in clinical practice and translational research through the EULAR Synovitis Study Group (ESSG) and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Group. Methods: Participants were consulted through a modified Delphi method. Three sequential rounds occurred over 12 months. Members were sent a written questionnaire containing items divided into two parts. Items were identified and formulated based on a scoping review. The first part of the questionnaire referred to synovial biopsies in clinical practice including five subsections, and the second part to translational research with six subsections. Every participant was asked to score each item on a 5-point Likert scale. Items with a median score above 3.5 and a >70% agreement were selected for the next round. The last round was conducted orally at EULAR in June 2017. Results: Twenty-seven participants from 19 centers were contacted by email. Twenty participants from 17 centers answered. Response rates for next rounds were 100%. For the first part relating to clinical practice, 20/44 items (45.5%) were selected. For the second part relating to translational research, 18/43 items (41.9%) were selected for the final set. Conclusions: We herein propose a consensual set of analysis items to be used for synovial biopsies conducted in clinical practice and translational research. Correction: Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of the ninth author's name

    Stratification of biological therapies by pathobiology in biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (STRAP and STRAP-EU): two parallel, open-label, biopsy-driven, randomised trials

    Get PDF
    Background Despite highly effective targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, about 40% of patients respond poorly, and predictive biomarkers for treatment choices are lacking. We did a biopsy-driven trial to compare the response to rituximab, etanercept, and tocilizumab in biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified for synovial B cell status. Methods STRAP and STRAP-EU were two parallel, open-label, biopsy-driven, stratified, randomised, phase 3 trials done across 26 university centres in the UK and Europe. Biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR)–European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were included. Following ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy, patients were classified as B cell poor or B cell rich according to synovial B cell signatures and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravenous rituximab (1000 mg at week 0 and week 2), subcutaneous tocilizumab (162 mg per week), or subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg per week). The primary outcome was the 16-week ACR20 response in the B cell-poor, intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients), with data pooled from the two trials, comparing etanercept and tocilizumab (grouped) versus rituximab. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2014-003529-16 (STRAP) and 2017-004079-30 (STRAP-EU). Findings Between June 8, 2015, and July 4, 2019, 226 patients were randomly assigned to etanercept (n=73), tocilizumab (n=74), and rituximab (n=79). Three patients (one in each group) were excluded after randomisation because they received parenteral steroids in the 4 weeks before recruitment. 168 (75%) of 223 patients in the intention-to-treat population were women and 170 (76%) were White. In the B cell-poor population, ACR20 response at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) showed no significant differences between etanercept and tocilizumab grouped together and rituximab (46 [60%] of 77 patients vs 26 [59%] of 44; odds ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·47–2·17], p=0·97). No differences were observed for adverse events, including serious adverse events, which occurred in six (6%) of 102 patients in the rituximab group, nine (6%) of 108 patients in the etanercept group, and three (4%) of 73 patients in the tocilizumab group (p=0·53). Interpretation In this biologic-naive population of patients with rheumatoid arthrtitis, the dichotomic classification into synovial B cell poor versus rich did not predict treatment response to B cell depletion with rituximab compared with alternative treatment strategies. However, the lack of response to rituximab in patients with a pauci-immune pathotype and the higher risk of structural damage progression in B cell-rich patients treated with rituximab warrant further investigations into the ability of synovial tissue analyses to inform disease pathogenesis and treatment response

    US-Guided Biopsies: Overarching Principles.

    No full text
    Gathering synovial tissue from any swollen joint especially in early arthritis patients is critical for good quality research and to obtain further insight into the pathophysiology of inflammatory joint diseases. Multiplying biopsy sites is a challenge in terms of the techniques needed for each different joint but also in terms of safety and tolerability. It is important to provide the best care especially in very early arthritis patients who have only had the disease for a few months. This review discusses the minimal requirements applying to antiseptic techniques for the operator's hands, patient preparation, local anesthesia, and post-procedure care

    Systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma)

    No full text
    Systemic sclerosis is a rare and often debilitating disorder characterized by a pathological triad: increased deposition of extracellular matrix and collagen in tissues, microvascular damage and dysfunction, and immune activation as evidenced by inflammation and frequent occurrence of autoantibodies. Until recently, therapeutic interventions were disappointing, given their inability to alter the natural course of this disease. The recognition that early detection and treatment of visceral complications are essential for stabilising, or in some cases, reversing their progression, has contributed greatly to improving the prognosis of systemic sclerosis. Furthermore, an increased interest in understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of this complex disease has opened new perspectives for therapy, targeting the diverse and inter-related components of the characteristic triad.SCOPUS: cp.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    EARLY REMISSION AT 6 MONTHS AS A PREDICTOR OF LONGTERM REMISSION IN NEW ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

    No full text
    Background Early therapeutic intervention is crucial for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA). The goal of remission is achievable in a large proportion of ERA patients. Objectives To evaluate the rate of patients in remission at 6 months and to correlate the 36 and 60 months remission rate in the Belgian CAP48 cohort and the UCLouvain Brussels cohort. To identify baseline characteristics differences between patients achieving remission or not. Methods We included patients with ERA from the CAP48 cohort and from the UCLouvain Brussels cohort who met the ACR/EULAR 2010 RA classification criteria. All patients were naïve to csDMARDs therapy. We collected patient characteristics at baseline and clinical response was analysed at 6, 36 and 60 months. Results 287 RA patients from our UCLouvain Brussels Cohort and the CAP48 cohort were analysed (211 Females, 76 Males, mean age 46.2 years, 43.4% with baseline erosion, 70.1% with ACPA, 70.3% with Rheumatoid Factor, mean HAQ 1.16, mean DAS28-CRP 4.67, mean SDAI 24.9 and mean CDAI 24.1)

    AB1579 Ultrasound joint assessments increase detection of polyarticular joint involvement in checkpoint inhibitors induced arthritis

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: CheckPoint Inhibitors (CPI) Induced arthritis (IA) is an immune related adverse event (irAEs) occurring in 0.5 to 2% of CPI-treated patients between 3 weeks up to 24 months after initiation of therapy. IA is usually described as a seronegative oligoarticular inflammatory joint disease but IA has been for long underdiagnosed and inappropriately evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the added value of a systematic joint ultrasound assessment in these patients by the rheumatologist. […
    corecore