10 research outputs found
Interstratification Patterns from the pH-Dependent Intercalation of a Tetracycline Antibiotic within Montmorillonite Layers
Little is known about the distribution
of the intercalated molecules
within the interstratified layers resulting from the pH-dependent
interlayer adsorption of ionizable organic molecules, including antibiotics,
within smectite-type clay minerals. Here we employed experimental
and simulated X-ray diffraction (XRD) to characterize interstratification
(or mixed layering) from the intercalation of oxytetracycline (OTC),
a commonly used tetracycline antibiotic, within Na-montmorillonite
layers at pHs 4, 5, 6, and 8. Our XRD data reveal that OTC is distributed
nonrandomly in the interlayers such that Na- and OTC-saturated interlayers
coexist. The profile of the full width at half-maximum intensity (fwhm),
monitored as a function of increasing layer-to-layer distance (<i>d</i><sub>001</sub>), resulting from an increasing amount of
intercalated OTC, reflects such mixed-layer crystals under the acidic
pH conditions. A minimum in fwhm occurs at a d spacing of about 1.8
nm, which is to be the optimal <i>d</i><sub>001</sub> for
OTC-saturated layers, in agreement with molecular modeling results.
Using the coordinates of the thermodynamically favorable configuration
of the adsorptives in a model montmorillonite interlayer, we simulated
XRD profiles to unravel the different patterns of interstratification
from the experimental data. At both pHs 4 and 5, Na- and OTC-interlayers
are randomly interstratified, whereas at pH 6, these layers are clustered,
as characterized by a segregated interstratification pattern. The
theoretical layer stacking sequences of the simulated XRD illustrate,
as pH increases, the clustering of similar layer types with the exclusion
of OTC intercalation from clay populations enriched in Na. At pH 8,
both fwhm and <i>d</i><sub>001</sub> indicate OTC adsorption
primarily on external surface sites, not within interlayers. Our findings
imply that, in addition to chemical speciation, a pH-dependent formation
of montmorillonite crystallites with unexfoliated layers may be responsible
both for the decreased OTC intercalation and for the increased binding
on external sites, thus resulting in the different patterns of interstratification
as a function of increasing pH
Fate of pathological prion (PrP<sup>sc</sup>92â138) in soil and water: prion-clay nanoparticle molecular dynamics
<div><p>Pathogenic prion protein scrapie (PrP<sup>sc</sup>) may contaminate soils for decades and remain in water in colloidal suspension, providing infection pathways for animals through the inhalation of ingested dust and soil particles, and drinking water. We used molecular dynamics simulations to understand the strong binding mechanism of this pathogenic peptide with clay mineral surfaces and compared our results to experimental works. We restricted our model to the moiety PrP(92â138), which is a portion of the whole PrP<sup>sc</sup> molecule responsible for infectivity and modeled it using explicit solvating water molecules in contact with a pyrophyllite cleavage plane. Pyrophyllite is taken as a model for common soil clay, but it has no permanent structural charge. However, partial residual negative charges occur on the cleavage plane slab surface due to a slab charge unbalance. The charge is isotropic in 2D and it was balanced with K<sup>+</sup> ions. After partially removing potassium ions, the peptide anchors to the clay surface via up to 10 hydrogen bonds, between protonated lysine or histidine residues and the oxygen atoms of the siloxane cavities. Our results provide insight to the mechanism responsible for the strong association between the PrP<sup>sc</sup> peptide and clay nanoparticles and the associations present in contaminated soil and water which may lead to the infection of animals.</p></div
OnâOff Mobilization of Contaminants in Soils during Redox Oscillations
Near-surface
biogeochemical systems can oscillate between oxic
and anoxic conditions. Under such periodic changes many redox-sensitive
inorganic contaminants undergo speciation, mobility and toxicity changes.
We investigated the changes to chromium (Cr), arsenic (As), selenium
(Se), antimony (Sb) and uranium (U) mobility during a series of laboratory
experiments where argillaceous substrates were subjected to successive
cycles of oxidizing and reducing conditions. The <i>E</i><sub>H</sub> oscillated between â320 and +470 mV, induced
via both abiotic and microbial forcings. Chemically induced cycles
of oxidation and reduction were achieved via a combination of gas
(N<sub>2</sub>:CO<sub>2</sub> vs compressed air) and carbon (ethanol)
addition, to stimulate the metabolism of a natively present microbial
community. The contaminants were added either alone or as contaminant
mixtures. Results show clear onâoff switch mobility behavior
for both major elements such as carbon (C), iron (Fe) and manganese
(Mn) and for contaminants. Mn, Fe, and As were mobilized under anoxic
conditions, whereas Sb, Se, and U were mobilized under oxic conditions.
While As, Sb, and U were reversibly sorbed, Se and Cr were irreversibly
sequestered via reductive precipitation. When present in aqueous solutions
at high concentrations, Cr<sup>VI</sup> prevented the reduction of
Mn and Fe, and inhibited the mobilization of elements with lower <i>E</i><sub>H</sub><sup>o</sup>. To improve remediation strategies
for multiple contaminants in redox-dynamic environments, we propose
a mixed kinetic-equilibrium biogeochemical model that can be forced
by oscillating boundary conditions and that uses literature rates
and constants to capture the key processes responsible for the mobilization
of contaminants in soils
Inhibition of U(VI) Reduction by Synthetic and Natural Pyrite
Reductive
precipitation is an effective method of attenuating the
mobility of uranium (U) in subsurface environments. The reduction
of UÂ(VI) by synthetic and naturally occurring pyrite was investigated
at pH 3.0â9.5. In contrast to thermodynamic calculations that
were used to predict UO<sub>2</sub>(s) precipitation, a mixed UÂ(IV)
and UÂ(VI) product (e.g., U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>/U<sub>4</sub>O<sub>9</sub>/U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7</sub>) was only observed at pH 6.21â8.63
and 4.52â4.83 for synthetic and natural pyrite, respectively.
Under acidic conditions, the reduction of UO<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> by surface-associated Fe<sup>2+</sup> may not be favored because
the mineral surface is nearly neutral or not negative enough. At high
pH, the sorption of negatively charged UÂ(VI) species is not favored
on the negatively charged mineral surface. Thus, the redox reaction
is not favored. Trace elements generally contained within the natural
pyrite structure can affect the reactivity of pyrite and lead to a
different result between the natural and synthetic pyrite. Because
UO<sub>2</sub>(s) is extremely redox-sensitive toward UÂ(VI), the observed
UO<sub>2+x</sub>(s) phase reduction product indicates a surface reaction
that is largely controlled by reaction kinetics and pyrite surface
chemistry. These factors may explain why most laboratory experiments
have observed incomplete UÂ(VI) reduction on FeÂ(II)-bearing minerals
Nanocomposite PyriteâGreigite Reactivity toward Se(IV)/Se(VI)
A nanopyrite/greigite composite was synthesized by reacting
FeCl<sub>3</sub> and NaHS in a ratio of 1:2 (Wei et al. 1996). Following
this
procedure, the obtained solid phases consisted of 30â50 nm
sized particles containing 28% of greigite (Fe<sup>2+</sup>Fe<sup>3+</sup><sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub>) and 72% pyrite (FeS<sub>2</sub>). Batch reactor experiments were performed with selenite or selenate
by equilibrating suspensions containing the nanosized pyriteâgreigite
solid phase at different pH-values and with or without the addition
of extra Fe<sup>2+</sup>. XANES-EXAFS spectroscopic techniques revealed,
for the first time, the formation of ferroselite (FeSe<sub>2</sub>) as the predominant reaction product, along with elemental Se. In
the present experimental conditions, at pH 6 and in equilibrium with
Se<sup>0</sup>, the solution is oversaturated with respect to ferrosilite.
Furthermore, thermodynamic computations show that reaction kinetics
likely played a significant role in our experimental system
Concentrations of aqueous Fe(II) in mg/L, of aqueous As(V) (black bars), As(III) (gray bars) and As(tot) (white bars) in mg/L, and of bacteria in million cells/mL
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Decoupling of arsenic and iron release from ferrihydrite suspension under reducing conditions: a biogeochemical model"</p><p>http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/8/1/12</p><p>Geochemical Transactions 2007;8():12-12.</p><p>Published online 29 Nov 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2246110.</p><p></p> Each group of 3 bars includes data of experiments AD1, CP1, AD5, CP5 after 1 day, 28 days and 63 days of As-2LFh incubation. Error bars represent the standard deviation of duplicated measurements
Aqueous Fe (squares) and As (triangles) concentrations released during experiments AD1 (a), AD5 (b), CP1 (c), CP5 (d)
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Decoupling of arsenic and iron release from ferrihydrite suspension under reducing conditions: a biogeochemical model"</p><p>http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/8/1/12</p><p>Geochemical Transactions 2007;8():12-12.</p><p>Published online 29 Nov 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2246110.</p><p></p> Empty symbols represent control experiments without bacteria. Proportions of released Fe and As are calculated by subtracting the concentration at the beginning of each experiment (Fig. 2) from the concentrations measured over time, and then dividing the differences by the initial solid content of Fe and As (Table 1), respectively. Error bars represent the standard deviation of duplicated measurements
Comparison of P-extractable As concentrations with the acid-leachable As content of the sediment collected with from (a) Chakdaha, India, and (b) Balia, Para, Bangladesh
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of dissolved and particulate arsenic distributions in shallow aquifers of Chakdaha, India, and Araihazar, Bangladesh"</p><p>http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/9/1/1</p><p>Geochemical Transactions 2008;9():1-1.</p><p>Published online 11 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2246114.</p><p></p> The two dashed lines in each panel correspond to a one-to-one correspondence and 10-fold higher HCl-extractable As concentrations, respectively. Also shown are dissolved As concentrations as a function of P-extractable As (c-d). Symbols identifying the profiles are the same as in Figure 2
Comparison of sediment Fe(II)/Fe ratios (a-b) and dissolved Fe (c-d) concentrations as a function of sulphate for needle-sampler samples collected in India (left) and Bangladesh (right)
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of dissolved and particulate arsenic distributions in shallow aquifers of Chakdaha, India, and Araihazar, Bangladesh"</p><p>http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/9/1/1</p><p>Geochemical Transactions 2008;9():1-1.</p><p>Published online 11 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2246114.</p><p></p> The symbols are color-coded in three ranges according to groundwater As concentrations. Dashed lines show the sulfate concentration in the Hooghly and Old Brahmaputra rivers
Histogram of EM conductivities around (a) Chakdaha, India and (b) Balia Para, Bangladesh
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Comparison of dissolved and particulate arsenic distributions in shallow aquifers of Chakdaha, India, and Araihazar, Bangladesh"</p><p>http://www.geochemicaltransactions.com/content/9/1/1</p><p>Geochemical Transactions 2008;9():1-1.</p><p>Published online 11 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2246114.</p><p></p> The location of the measurements is shown by black symbols on a contour map of EM conductivity, color-coded in the same ranges as in the histogram (c-d). Also shown are the locations of needle-sampler profiles using the same symbols of Fig. 2. (e-f) Lithological cross-sections for the two sites showing the distribution of clay/silt (black) and sand (white). (g-h) Contoured section of major cation concentrations for groundwater collected with the needle-sampler. Sections drawn with Ocean Data View [47]