41 research outputs found

    Study profile: selection of study patients.

    No full text
    <p>Patients from 12 Médecins Sans Frontières sites in Uganda, Sudan, Angola, Central African Republic, Republic of Congo and Democratic Republic of Congo, 1995–2006. <sup>a</sup> Among these 906 exclusions there are 125 patients that relapsed before 6 months (hence falling out of the scope of this study); <sup>b</sup> Tolerance window up to 9 months.</p

    Baseline characteristics of patients included in each analysis.

    No full text
    <p>First analysis: leukocytes at 6 months, excluding relapses at 6 months; Second analysis: leukocytes at 6 months, including relapses at 6 months, two-step algorithms. Combination treatment: within this selected cohort, it included melarsoprol-eflornithine, nifurtimox-eflornithine and melarsoprol-nifurtimox combinations. Coma score: Glasgow Coma Scale assessing the level of consciousness. Interpretation: 3–8 = severe impairment; 9–12 = moderate impairment; 13–14 = mild impairment; 15 = normal <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001662#pntd.0001662-Teasdale1" target="_blank">[13]</a>; Karnofsky index <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001662#pntd.0001662-Mor1" target="_blank">[14]</a>.</p

    Comparison of several two-steps (6 and 12 months) algorithms for early outcome determination.

    No full text
    a<p>As reported by Mumba 2010, “algorithm C”: includes deaths as treatment failures and patients with incomplete follow-up;</p>b<p>Same algorithm tested with our dataset including only laboratory-confirmed outcomes. LR: Likelihood ratio. False cured: fraction of patients that are wrongly classified as cured by the algorithm.</p

    Evolution of the CSF leucocytes count by final treatment outcome, by treatment group and overall.

    No full text
    <p>CSF leucocytes count expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Cohort of 1822 patients having a leukocytes count performed at 6 months and not relapsing at 6 months or earlier, who had a complete follow-up. Values at month 0 are pre-treatment measurements. The number of patients per group is shown at each time point. Dotted lines are used to signify that samples over time contain some different patients.</p

    Performance of different cut-off values of CSF leucocytes count at 6 months for the detection of relapse.

    No full text
    <p>Performance of different cut-off values of CSF leucocytes count at 6 months for the detection of relapse.</p

    Correlation of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup> Compared with EDTA sample results on BD FacsCount at Day 0 (reference methodology).</p><p><sup>b</sup> Comparing same day results of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow cytometers.</p><p><sup>c</sup> Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.</p><p><sup>d</sup> Partec Cyflow Stabilization Tube sample results at day 30 censored due to small sample size.</p><p>BD: Becton Dickinson; CD4: Cluster of Differentiation Type 4.</p><p>Correlation of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.</p

    Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/ÎĽL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.

    No full text
    <p>ART: Anti-retroviral therapy. CD4: Cluster of Differentiation Type 4. CI: Confidence Interval.</p><p>Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/ÎĽL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.</p
    corecore