Molecular apocrine breast cancers are aggressive estrogen receptor negative tumors overexpressing either HER2 or GCDFP15.

International audienceINTRODUCTION: Molecular apocrine (MA) tumors are estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancers characterized by androgen receptor (AR) expression. We analyzed a group of 58 transcriptionally defined MA tumors and proposed a new tool to identify these tumors. METHODS: We performed quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) for ESR1, AR, FOXA1 and AR-related genes, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER, PR, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), CK5/6, CK17, EGFR, Ki67, AR, FOXA1 and GCDFP15 and we analyzed clinical features. RESULTS: MA tumors were all characterized by ESR1(-) AR(+) FOXA1(+) and AR-related genes positive mRNA profile. IHC staining on these tumors showed 93% ER(-), only 58% AR(+) and 90% FOXA1(+). 67% and 57% MA tumors were HER2(3+) and GCDFP15(+), respectively. Almost all MA tumors (94%) had the IHC signature HER2(3+) or GCDFP15(+) but none of the 13 control basal-like (BL) tumors did. Clinically, MA tumors were rather aggressive, with poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: MA tumors could be better defined by their qRT-PCR-AR profile than by AR IHC. In addition, we found that HER2 or GCDFP15 protein overexpression is a sensitive and specific tool to differentiate MA from BL in the context of ER negative tumors. A composite molecular and IHC signature could, therefore, help to identify MA tumors in daily practice

Negative Relationship between Post-Treatment Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Dose-Dense Dose-Intense NeoAdjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: Patients with triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have a poor prognosis unless a pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Few studies have analyzed changes in TIL levels following dose-dense dose-intense (dd-di) NAC. Patients and methods: From 2009 to 2018, 117 patients with TNBC received dd-di NAC at our institution. We aimed to identify factors associated with pre- and post-NAC TIL levels, and oncological outcomes relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Median pre-NAC and post-NAC TIL levels were 15% and 3%, respectively. Change in TIL levels with treatment was significantly correlated with metabolic response (SUV) and pCR. High post-NAC TIL levels were associated with a weak metabolic response after two cycles of NAC, with the presence of residual disease and nodal involvement at NAC completion. In multivariate analyses, high post-NAC TIL levels independently predicted poor RFS and poor OS (HR = 1.4 per 10% increment, 95%CI (1.1; 1.9) p = 0.014 and HR = 1.8 per 10% increment 95%CI (1.3–2.3), p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that TNBC patients with TIL enrichment after NAC are at higher risk of relapse. These patients are potential candidates for adjuvant treatment, such as immunotherapy, in clinical trials