Commonality analysis on published studies Study #3, #4a, and #4b.

<p>Commonality analysis on published studies Study #3, #4a, and #4b.</p

Commonality analysis with hopelessness, rumination/brooding, and dysfunctional attitudes used as predictors and depressive symptoms as outcome.

<p>U1, 2, 3: variance explained uniquely (i.e., specificity) by hopelessness (U1), rumination/brooding (U2), and dysfunctional attitudes (U3), respectively. C1, 2, 3: common variance explained (i.e., overlap) by hopelessness or rumination/brooding (C1), hopelessness or dysfunctional attitudes (C2), and rumination/brooding or dysfunctional attitudes (C3). C4: variance explained by hopelessness or rumination/brooding or dysfunctional attitudes.</p

Variance explained uniquely (specificity) by hopelessness (U1), rumination/brooding (U2), and dysfunctional attitudes (U3) in Study #1 and #2a.

<p>Variance explained uniquely (specificity) by hopelessness (U1), rumination/brooding (U2), and dysfunctional attitudes (U3) in Study #1 and #2a.</p

General overlap of hopelessness, rumination/brooding, and dysfunctional attitudes in accounting for the single depressive symptoms in Study #1 and #2a.

<p>General overlap of hopelessness, rumination/brooding, and dysfunctional attitudes in accounting for the single depressive symptoms in Study #1 and #2a.</p

Commonality analysis of Study #2a and #2b and bootstrap-based comparisons among the partitions.

<p>Commonality analysis of Study #2a and #2b and bootstrap-based comparisons among the partitions.</p

Commonality analysis across Study #1, #2a, b, #3, and #4a, b.

<p>Percentile-based 95% bootstrap confidence intervals are reported.</p

Commonality analysis of Study #1 and bootstrap-based comparisons among the partitions.

<p>Commonality analysis of Study #1 and bootstrap-based comparisons among the partitions.</p

Cognitive reappraisal attenuates the association between depressive symptoms and emotional response to stress during adolescence

<p>Depression is associated with increased emotional response to stress. This is especially the case during the developmental period of adolescence. Cognitive reappraisal is an effective emotion regulation strategy that has been shown to reduce the impact of emotional response on psychopathology. However, less is known about whether cognitive reappraisal impacts the relationship between depressive symptoms and emotional responses, and whether its effects are specific to emotional reactivity or emotional recovery. The current study examined whether cognitive reappraisal moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and trait or state measures of emotional reactivity and recovery. A community sample of 127 adolescents (<i>M</i>-age = 15.28; 49% female, 47% Caucasian), at an age of risk for depression, completed self-report measures of trait emotional responding and depressive symptoms. In addition, they completed an in vivo social stress task and were assessed on state emotional reactivity and recovery from the stressor. Findings suggested that cognitive reappraisal was associated with an attenuated impact of depressive symptoms on trait and state emotional recovery. These results provide evidence that cognitive reappraisal may be an effective strategy for improving some aspects of emotional responding in relation to depressive symptoms among adolescents.</p