Combining ecstasy and ethanol: higher risk for toxicity? A review

Ecstasy use is commonly combined with ethanol consumption. While combination drug use in general is correlated with a higher risk for toxicity, the risk of the specific combination of ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)) and ethanol is largely unknown. Therefore, we have reviewed the literature on changes in MDMA pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics due to concurrent ethanol exposure in human, animal and in vitro studies. MDMA pharmacokinetics appear unaffected: the MDMA blood concentration after concurrent exposure to MDMA and ethanol was comparable to lone MDMA exposure in multiple human placebo-controlled studies. In contrast, MDMA pharmacodynamics were affected: locomotor activity increased and body temperature decreased after concurrent exposure to MDMA and ethanol compared to lone MDMA exposure. Importantly, these additional ethanol effects were consistently observed in multiple animal studies. Additional ethanol effects have also been reported on other pharmacodynamic aspects, but are inconclusive due to a low number of studies or due to inconsistent findings. These investigated pharmacodynamic aspects include monoamine brain concentrations, neurological (psychomotor function, memory, anxiety, reinforcing properties), cardiovascular, liver and endocrine effects. Although only a single or a few studies were available investigating these aspects, most studies indicated an aggravation of MDMA-induced effects upon concurrent ethanol exposure. In summary, concurrent ethanol exposure appears to increase the risk for MDMA toxicity. Increased toxicity is due to an aggravation of MDMA pharmacodynamics, while MDMA pharmacokinetics is largely unaffected. Although a significant attenuation of the MDMA-induced increase of body temperature was observed in animal studies, its relevance for human exposure remains unclear

Pregabalin Poisoning: Evaluation of Dose-Toxicity Relationship

Context: Pregabalin poisoning is mostly benign, although coma and convulsions occasionally occur. Aim: To determine the dose-toxicity relationship of pregabalin. Methods: Dose-toxicity data of isolated pregabalin poisonings were collected from (1) a prospective study performed by the Dutch Poisons Information Centre (4 April 2014 to 4 October 2016) and from (2) case reports and case series reported in literature. Poisonings were graded using the Poisoning Severity Score (PSS) and the relationship between dose (mg kg −1) and PSS was evaluated. Results: In our study (n = 21 patients), the most commonly observed symptoms were drowsiness (62%), confusion (29%) and apathy (24%). PSS was none in three (14%), minor in 15 (71%), and moderate in three patients (14%). Most case series also reported a PSS of none to minor in the majority of poisonings (69-100%). For 34 individual patients (21 from our study and 13 from literature), detailed data on dose and clinical course were available to examine the dose-toxicity relationship. The median dose was significantly lower in the PSS none-minor group (“benign”) (8.6 mg kg −1, interquartile range (IQ25-75) 5.0-17.6 mg kg −1) than in the PSS moderate-severe group (“significant toxicity”) (46.7 mg kg −1, IQ25-75 21.3-64.3 mg kg −1); estimate of the median difference = 27.3 mg kg −1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 10-48.6). Conclusions: In general, higher pregabalin doses result in more severe poisonings. Below 20 mg kg −1 the majority of patients (83%) only suffer from mild poisoning. However, large interindividual differences exist in pregabalin-induced toxicity. Therefore, pre-hospital triage should not only include pregabalin dose, but also underlying illnesses, co-exposures and reported symptoms

Significant toxicity following an increase in poisonings with designer benzodiazepines in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2020

BACKGROUND: Designer benzodiazepines (DBs) are an emerging class of new psychoactive substances. While structurally derived from pharmaceutical benzodiazepines, their toxicological profile is less clear. We investigated time trends in the rate of DB poisonings and their clinical toxicity. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on the incidence rate of DB poisonings, relative to all recreational drug poisonings reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center (DPIC) from 2010 to 2020. Time-trend analysis was performed using Poisson regression. A prospective cohort study was performed on toxicity of DBs, including the Poisoning Severity Score, from January 2016-June 2019. Data was collected through telephone interviews. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, the DPIC was consulted on 142 DB exposures. The incidence rate of DB exposures increased from 0.1% to 4.3%, with a year effect estimate of 1.35 (95% CI [1.14;1.54]). Twenty different DBs were reported, mostly etizolam (33%), clonazolam (17%), and flunitrazolam (8%). During consultation (often shortly after exposure), poisoning was graded moderate-severe in 29% of cases (n = 146). In the prospective cohort sample with follow-up (n = 22), 86% of cases (n = 19) showed a moderate-severe poisoning. The severity of poisoning did not differ between mono- and mixed intoxications. Frequently reported symptoms in the prospective cohort sample included drowsiness (86%), confusion (59%), and agitation (55%). Coma was observed in seven cases (32%) and respiratory depression requiring mechanical ventilation in five cases (23%). CONCLUSION: The rate of DB poisonings reported to the DPIC strongly increased from 2010 to 2020, indicating increased (ab)use of DBs. Most DB exposures resulted in moderate-severe toxicity with neurological effects

High Incidence of Signs of Neuropathy and Self-Reported Substance Use Disorder for Nitrous Oxide in Patients Intoxicated with Nitrous Oxide

Introduction: The number of patients with excessive nitrous oxide (N2O) use and neurological disorders has been rising, indicating an addictive potential of N2O. We studied the incidence of self-reported substance use disorder (SUD)-related symptoms, signs of neuropathy, and the patterns of use in N2O-intoxicated patients. Methods: The Dutch Poisons Information Center (DPIC) provides information by telephone on the management of intoxications to healthcare professionals. Retrospective data on signs of neuropathy and patterns of use were collected for all N2O intoxications reported to the DPIC in 2021 and 2022. Frequent and heavy use were self-reported as "often/frequent/weekly use"and as "use of tanks or >50 balloons/session,"respectively. From this cohort, we included patients with excessive N2O use or signs of neuropathy in a prospective observational cohort study. Online surveys were sent 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after DPIC consultation. The survey included the drug use disorder questionnaire (validated to measure self-reported substance abuse [SA] and substance dependence [SD] based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM]-IV-TR criteria) and questions on patterns of use and signs of neuropathy. DSM-IV-TR criteria were translated to DSM-V criteria to score for mild, moderate, or severe SUD, with 2-3, 4-5, or ≥6 symptoms, respectively. Results: We included 101 N2O-intoxicated patients in the retrospective study. Of these, 41% showed signs of neuropathy (N = 41), 53% used N2O tanks to fill balloons (N = 53), 71% used them frequently (N = 72), and 76% used them heavily (N = 77). We included 75 patients in the prospective study and 10 (13%) completed the first survey. All 10 patients fulfilled the criteria for SA and SD (DSM-IV-TR, median number of questions answered "yes"= 10/12), all used N2O tanks to fill balloons, and 90% (N = 9) experienced signs of neuropathy. After 1 and 3 months, 6/7 and 1/1 patients, respectively, continued to fulfill SA and SD criteria. Translating to DSM-V criteria, 1/10 patients fulfilled the criteria for (self-reported) mild SUD, 1/10 patients for moderate SUD, and 8/10 patients for severe SUD, 1 week after consultation. Conclusion: The high proportion of N2O-intoxicated patients reporting frequent and heavy use of N2O indicates an addictive potential of N2O. Although follow-up rate was low, all patients fulfilled self-reported SA, SD (DSM-IV-TR), and SUD (DSM-V) criteria for N2O. Somatic healthcare professionals treating patients with N2O intoxications should be aware of possible addictive behavior in patients. The screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment approach should be considered to treat patients with self-reported SUD symptoms

Pharmacology of MDMA- and Amphetamine-Like New Psychoactive Substances

New psychoactive substances (NPS) with amphetamine-, aminoindan-, and benzofuran basic chemical structures have recently emerged for recreational drug use. Detailed information about their psychotropic effects and health risks is often limited. At the same time, it emerged that the pharmacological profiles of these NPS resemble those of amphetamine or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Amphetamine-like NPS induce psychostimulation and euphoria mediated predominantly by norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) transporter (NET and DAT) inhibition and transporter-mediated release of NE and DA, thus showing a more catecholamine-selective profile. MDMA-like NPS frequently induce well-being, empathy, and prosocial effects and have only moderate psychostimulant properties. These MDMA-like substances primarily act by inhibiting the serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT) and NET, also inducing 5-HT and NE release. Monoamine receptor interactions vary considerably among amphetamine- and MDMA-like NPS. Clinically, amphetamine- and MDMA-like NPS can induce sympathomimetic toxicity. The aim of this chapter is to review the state of knowledge regarding these substances with a focus on the description of the in vitro pharmacology of selected amphetamine- and MDMA-like NPS. In addition, it is aimed to provide links between pharmacological profiles and in vivo effects and toxicity, which leads to the conclusion that abuse liability for amphetamine-like NPS may be higher than for MDMA-like NPS, but that the risk for developing the life-threatening serotonin syndrome may be increased for MDMA-like NPS

Changes in neuronal activity in rat primary cortical cultures induced by illicit drugs and new psychoactive substances (NPS) following prolonged exposure and washout to mimic human exposure scenarios

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is increasing despite associated health risks and limited pharmacological and toxicological knowledge. Information is available mainly for acute effects on specific targets like monoamine transporters and receptors. Recently, we have shown the ability of several NPS and illicit drugs to modulate neuronal activity during acute exposure. While these acute measurements provide valuable information regarding the potency and possible structure-activity relationships, an exposure scenario more representative of human exposure would increase insight and aid translation to the human situation. Therefore, we investigated the effects on neuronal activity after acute (30 min) and prolonged (5 h) exposure to amphetamine-type stimulants, cathinones, hallucinogens, piperazines and cocaine using rat primary cortical cultures grown on multi-well microelectrode arrays. To investigate the reversibility of effects, activity was also measured after a washout period of 19 h. During acute exposure, all compounds concentration-dependently decreased neuronal activity. Compared to acute exposure, prolonged exposure did not further decrease neuronal activity. Following washout, effects of 3 out of 11 drugs (methamphetamine, cocaine, and benzylpiperazine) were fully reversible, whereas effects induced by MDMA, PMMA and α-PVP were partially reversible. Neuronal activity did not recover after 19 h washout following exposure to the highest concentration of MDPV, 2C-B, 25B-NBOMe, and TFMPP. On the contrary, exposure to low concentrations of methylone, and to some extent of 2C-B, increased neuronal activity after the washout period. Hazard characterization of emerging NPS should include at least an acute exposure to determine a potency rank order. Supplementing the (acute and prolonged) exposure scenario with a washout period allows investigation of the reversibility of effects. The possibility of a neuronal network to regain activity after drug exposure appears independent of drug class or IC50 values for acute and prolonged exposure. Even though neuronal activity (partly) recovers after washout following exposure to most drugs, it is perturbing that complete recovery of neuronal activity is observed only for a minority of the tested drugs

Changes in neuronal activity in rat primary cortical cultures induced by illicit drugs and new psychoactive substances (NPS) following prolonged exposure and washout to mimic human exposure scenarios

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is increasing despite associated health risks and limited pharmacological and toxicological knowledge. Information is available mainly for acute effects on specific targets like monoamine transporters and receptors. Recently, we have shown the ability of several NPS and illicit drugs to modulate neuronal activity during acute exposure. While these acute measurements provide valuable information regarding the potency and possible structure-activity relationships, an exposure scenario more representative of human exposure would increase insight and aid translation to the human situation. Therefore, we investigated the effects on neuronal activity after acute (30 min) and prolonged (5 h) exposure to amphetamine-type stimulants, cathinones, hallucinogens, piperazines and cocaine using rat primary cortical cultures grown on multi-well microelectrode arrays. To investigate the reversibility of effects, activity was also measured after a washout period of 19 h. During acute exposure, all compounds concentration-dependently decreased neuronal activity. Compared to acute exposure, prolonged exposure did not further decrease neuronal activity. Following washout, effects of 3 out of 11 drugs (methamphetamine, cocaine, and benzylpiperazine) were fully reversible, whereas effects induced by MDMA, PMMA and α-PVP were partially reversible. Neuronal activity did not recover after 19 h washout following exposure to the highest concentration of MDPV, 2C-B, 25B-NBOMe, and TFMPP. On the contrary, exposure to low concentrations of methylone, and to some extent of 2C-B, increased neuronal activity after the washout period. Hazard characterization of emerging NPS should include at least an acute exposure to determine a potency rank order. Supplementing the (acute and prolonged) exposure scenario with a washout period allows investigation of the reversibility of effects. The possibility of a neuronal network to regain activity after drug exposure appears independent of drug class or IC50 values for acute and prolonged exposure. Even though neuronal activity (partly) recovers after washout following exposure to most drugs, it is perturbing that complete recovery of neuronal activity is observed only for a minority of the tested drugs