Trading Secrets--The International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act

This article will explore the terms of the IAEAA, questioning in particular whether the Act provides a viable mechanism for information exchange, as well as whether it embodies a true commitment to argued to the European Court of Justice that the Agreement should have been concluded by the European Council rather than the European Commission. French Republic v. Commission of the European Communities, Case C-327/91 (1994)

Managing globalisation : international cooperation in economic regulation

Defence date: 6 April 1998Examining board: Prof. Renaud Dehousse, European University Institute (supervisor) ; Prof. Eleanor Fox, New York University School of Law ; Prof. Giandomenico Majone, European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht (co-supervisor) ; Prof. Francis Snyder, European University InstitutePDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digitised archive of EUI PhD theses completed between 2013 and 201

Antitrust Federalism in the United States and Decentralization of Competition Law Enforcement in the European Union: A Comparison

This Article will discuss the historical context in which the competition law enforcement structures of the European Union and United States were created, describe the dual enforcement structures, and explain current efforts to coordinate the two levels of enforcement. It will conclude with observations about the nature of dual enforcement under the two systems. More specifically, it will argue that the European Union should create an enforcement system, which might allow more collaboration and cooperation between the Commission and the European Union Member States

Trading Secrets--The International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act

This article will explore the terms of the IAEAA, questioning in particular whether the Act provides a viable mechanism for information exchange, as well as whether it embodies a true commitment to argued to the European Court of Justice that the Agreement should have been concluded by the European Council rather than the European Commission. French Republic v. Commission of the European Communities, Case C-327/91 (1994)

European Union broadcasting and telecoms: towards a convergent regulatory regime?

After placing the development of EU broadcasting and telecommunications policy into its historical context, the article argues that the EU, having traditionally found it difficult to develop a regulatory regime concerning content and culture, has primarily utilized telecommunications regulation in regard to broadcasting. This framework is a necessary but insufficient base for the regulation of convergent technologies