Pathological features of vessel co-option versus sprouting angiogenesis

Cancer cells can use existing blood vessels to acquire a vasculature. This process is termed 'vessel co-option'. Vessel co-option is an alternative to the growth of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, and is adopted by a wide range of human tumour types growing within numerous tissues. A complementary aspect of this process is extravascular migratory tumour spread using the co-opted blood vessels as a trail. Vessel co-opting tumours can be discriminated from angiogenic tumours by specific morphological features. These features give rise to distinct histopathological growth patterns that reflect the interaction of cancer cells with the microenvironment of the organ in which they thrive. We will discuss the histopathological growth patterns of vessel co-option in the brain, the liver and the lungs. The review will also highlight evidence for the potential clinical value of the histopathological growth patterns of cancer. Vessel co-option can affect patient outcomes and resistance to cancer treatment. Insight into the biological drivers of this process of tumour vascularization will yield novel therapeutic strategies

Pathological features of vessel co-option versus sprouting angiogenesis

Cancer cells can use existing blood vessels to acquire a vasculature. This process is termed 'vessel co-option'. Vessel co-option is an alternative to the growth of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, and is adopted by a wide range of human tumour types growing within numerous tissues. A complementary aspect of this process is extravascular migratory tumour spread using the co-opted blood vessels as a trail. Vessel co-opting tumours can be discriminated from angiogenic tumours by specific morphological features. These features give rise to distinct histopathological growth patterns that reflect the interaction of cancer cells with the microenvironment of the organ in which they thrive. We will discuss the histopathological growth patterns of vessel co-option in the brain, the liver and the lungs. The review will also highlight evidence for the potential clinical value of the histopathological growth patterns of cancer. Vessel co-option can affect patient outcomes and resistance to cancer treatment. Insight into the biological drivers of this process of tumour vascularization will yield novel therapeutic strategies

Can medical imaging identify the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases?

The histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases of colorectal cancer and of several other tumor types predict outcome of patients in multiple studies. The HGPs of liver metastases have a prognostic but also a predictive value with one of the growth patterns, the replacement growth pattern, related to resistance to systemic treatment. Given that the HGP can only be assessed in a reliable manner when a surgical resection of the metastasis has been performed, this biomarker cannot be exploited to the full. For example, HGPs can at this moment, not be used to decide whether patients with liver metastatic breast or colorectal cancer will benefit or not from locoregional treatment, such as surgery or radiotherapy, and from peri-operative systemic treatment. In this review we highlight studies that suggest that the HGPs of liver metastases can be identified by medical imaging. Although still to be confirmed by a prospective multicenter approach, some studies indeed achieve a high accuracy in predicting the HGPs by applying radiomic algorithms on CT- or MR-images of liver metastases. This is an important step towards a treatment planning of patients with liver metastatic cancer that takes into account the biology and the progression kinetics of the metastases

Histopathological growth patterns and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer liver metastases

Liver is the third most common organ for breast cancer (BC) metastasis. Two main histopathological growth patterns (HGP) exist in liver metastases (LM): desmoplastic and replacement. Although a reduced immunotherapy efficacy is reported in patients with LM, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have not yet been investigated in BCLM. Here, we evaluate the distribution of the HGP and TIL in BCLM, and their association with clinicopathological variables and survival. We collect samples from surgically resected BCLM (n = 133 patients, 568 H&amp;E sections) and post-mortem derived BCLM (n = 23 patients, 97 H&amp;E sections). HGP is assessed as the proportion of tumor liver interface and categorized as pure-replacement (‘pure r-HGP’) or any-desmoplastic (‘any d-HGP’). We score the TIL according to LM-specific guidelines. Associations with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are assessed using Cox regressions. We observe a higher prevalence of ‘any d-HGP’ (56%) in the surgical samples and a higher prevalence of ‘pure r-HGP’ (83%) in the post-mortem samples. In the surgical cohort, no evidence of the association between HGP and clinicopathological characteristics is observed except with the laterality of the primary tumor (p value = 0.049) and the systemic preoperative treatment before liver surgery (p value =.039). TIL is less prevalent in ‘pure r-HGP’ as compared to ‘any d-HGP’ (p value = 0.001). ‘Pure r-HGP’ predicts worse PFS (HR: 2.65; CI: (1.45–4.82); p value = 0.001) and OS (HR: 3.10; CI: (1.29–7.46); p value = 0.011) in the multivariable analyses. To conclude, we demonstrate that BCLM with a ‘pure r-HGP’ is associated with less TIL and with the worse outcome when compared with BCLM with ‘any d-HGP’. These findings suggest that HGP could be considered to refine treatment approaches.</p

Association between the histopathological growth patterns of liver metastases and survival after hepatic surgery in breast cancer patients

Currently, there are no markers to identify patients with liver-only or liver-dominant metastases that would benefit from hepatic surgery. Here we characterized histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases in a consecutive series of 36 breast cancer patients who underwent hepatic surgery. Survival analyses showed that the presence of a desmoplastic HGP in the liver metastases (a rim of fibrous tissue separating cancer cells from the liver parenchyma, present in 20 (56%) patients) is independently associated with favorable progression-free and overall survival when compared with the replacement HGP (cancer cells growing into the liver parenchyma, present in 16 (44%) patients).SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Transcriptomic characterization of the histopathological growth patterns in breast cancer liver metastases

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable and liver metastases (LM) are observed in approximately 50% of all patients with mBC. In some cases, surgical resection of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is associated with prolonged survival. However, there are currently no validated marker to identify these patients. The interactions between the metastatic cancer cells and the liver microenvironment result in two main histopathological growth patterns (HGP): replacement (r-HGP), characterized by a direct contact between the cancer cells and the hepatocytes, and desmoplastic (d-HGP), in which a fibrous rim surrounds the tumor cells. In patients who underwent resection of BCLM, the r-HGP is associated with a worse postoperative prognosis than the d-HGP. Here, we aim at unraveling the biological differences between these HGP within ten patients presenting both HGP within the same metastasis. The transcriptomic analyses reveal overexpression of genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, vessel co-option and cell motility in r-HGP while angiogenesis, wound healing, and several immune processes were found overexpressed in d-HGP LM. Understanding the biology of the LM could open avenues to refine treatment of BC patients with LM.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe