Drinking until Intoxication:A Qualitative Study among Underage Adolescents Admitted to the Emergency Room

This study explored factors that contribute to an alcohol intoxication resulting in Emergency Room (ER) admission among underage adolescents. We conducted qualitative interviews with 14 adolescents (14–18 years old) who experienced an alcohol intoxication requiring ER admission. Motivations for drinking were individual (e.g. curiosity) or social (e.g. having fun). While circumstances and motivations were comparable with other studies among (binge) drinking youth in general, most adolescents in this study did not drink with the intention to get drunk. They often unknowingly and unintentionally crossed their limits because they had not enough knowledge or experience to foresee the consequences

Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers

OBJECTIVE: Moderately preterm children (gestational age 32-36+6 weeks) are at risk of cognitive and behaviour problems at school age. The aim of this study was to investigate if these problems are already present at the age of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Developmental outcome was assessed at 24-months (corrected age) with the Bayley-III-NL in 116 moderately preterm (M=34.66 ± 1.35 weeks gestation) and 99 term born children (M=39.45 ± 0.98 weeks gestation). Behaviour problems were assessed with the Child Behaviour Checklist. RESULTS: With age corrected for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term peers on Receptive Communication skills (11.05 ± 2.58 vs 12.02 ± 2.74, p=0.02). Without correcting age for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term born peers on Cognition (8.97 ± 2.11 vs 10.68 ± 2.35, p<0.001), Fine Motor (10.33 ± 2.15 vs 11.96 ± 2.15, p<0.001), Gross Motor (8.47 ± 2.55 vs 9.39±2.80, p=0.05), Receptive Communication (10.09 ± 2.48 vs 12.02 ± 2.74, p<0.001) and Expressive Communication (10.33 ± 2.43 vs 11.49 ± 2.51, p=0.005) skills. Compared with term peers, more moderately preterm children showed a (mild) delay (ie, scaled score <7) in gross motor skills with age uncorrected for prematurity (20.7% vs 11.2%, p=0.04). Moderately preterm children had more internalising behaviour problems than term children (44.76 ± 8.94 vs 41.54 ± 8.56, p=0.03). No group differences were found in percentages of (sub)clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: At the age of 2 years, uncorrected for prematurity, differences in cognition, communication, and motor development were present in moderately preterm children compared with term born peers. After correcting age for prematurity, a difference was only found for receptive communication skills. In addition, moderately preterm children show more internalising behaviour problems

Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers

OBJECTIVE: Moderately preterm children (gestational age 32-36+6 weeks) are at risk of cognitive and behaviour problems at school age. The aim of this study was to investigate if these problems are already present at the age of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Developmental outcome was assessed at 24-months (corrected age) with the Bayley-III-NL in 116 moderately preterm (M=34.66 ± 1.35 weeks gestation) and 99 term born children (M=39.45 ± 0.98 weeks gestation). Behaviour problems were assessed with the Child Behaviour Checklist. RESULTS: With age corrected for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term peers on Receptive Communication skills (11.05 ± 2.58 vs 12.02 ± 2.74, p=0.02). Without correcting age for prematurity, moderately preterm children scored below term born peers on Cognition (8.97 ± 2.11 vs 10.68 ± 2.35, p<0.001), Fine Motor (10.33 ± 2.15 vs 11.96 ± 2.15, p<0.001), Gross Motor (8.47 ± 2.55 vs 9.39±2.80, p=0.05), Receptive Communication (10.09 ± 2.48 vs 12.02 ± 2.74, p<0.001) and Expressive Communication (10.33 ± 2.43 vs 11.49 ± 2.51, p=0.005) skills. Compared with term peers, more moderately preterm children showed a (mild) delay (ie, scaled score <7) in gross motor skills with age uncorrected for prematurity (20.7% vs 11.2%, p=0.04). Moderately preterm children had more internalising behaviour problems than term children (44.76 ± 8.94 vs 41.54 ± 8.56, p=0.03). No group differences were found in percentages of (sub)clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: At the age of 2 years, uncorrected for prematurity, differences in cognition, communication, and motor development were present in moderately preterm children compared with term born peers. After correcting age for prematurity, a difference was only found for receptive communication skills. In addition, moderately preterm children show more internalising behaviour problems