Insights from the German Compassionate Use Program of Nintedanib for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background: Nintedanib is approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis(IPF) and has been shown to slow disease progression by reducing annual lung function decline. Objective: To evaluate the results of a large cohort of IPF patients treated with nintedanib within a compassionate use program(CUP) in Germany(9 centers). Methods: Patients ( >= 40 years) were required to have a confirmed diagnosis of IPF, a forced vital capacity(FVC) >= 50% predicted ( pred.) and a carbon monoxide diffusing capacity(DLCO) 30-79% pred. and not to be eligible for pirfenidone treatment. Clinical data, pulmonary function tests and adverse events were recorded up to July 2015. Results: Sixty-two patients (48 male/14 female) with moderate IPF (FVC 64 +/- 17% pred. and DLCO 40 +/- 10% pred.) were treated with nintedanib. 77% of patients switched from pirfenidone (mean treatment duration 14 +/- 2 months) mostly due to disease progression (mean decline in FVC 7.4 +/- 3% pred. in the 6 months prior to nintedanib intake). Initiation of nintedanib treatment occurred 69 +/- 29 months after IPF diagnosis, and mean treatment duration was 8 +/- 4 months. Most patients (63%) stabilized 6 months after treatment start (mean FVC decline 3 +/- 1 vs. -17 +/- 2% in patients with disease progression;p < 0.01). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (63%) and weight loss (50%). Dose reduction occurred in 34% of cases and treatment discontinuation in 10%. Conclusion: Nintedanib treatment was generally well tolerated and was associated with FVC stabilization in the majority of IPF patients in this CUP setting where most patients were not treatment naive. Our data are in agreement with the previously published data. (C) 2016 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Base

The clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and its association to quality of life over time: longitudinal data from the INSIGHTS-IPF registry

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is profoundly impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, data is limited regarding the course of QoL. We therefore analysed longitudinal data from the German INSIGHTS-IPF registry. Methods: Clinical status and QoL were assessed at enrollment and subsequently at 6- to 12-months intervals. A range of different QoL questionnaires including the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were used. Results: Data from 424 patients were included; 76.9% male; mean age 68.7 ± 9.1 years, mean FVC% predicted 75.9 ± 19.4, mean DLCO% predicted 36.1 ± 15.9. QoL worsened significantly during follow-up with higher total SGRQ scores (increased by 1.47 per year; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.76; p &lt; 0.001) and higher UCSD-SOBQ scores and lower EQ-5D VAS and WHO-5 scores. An absolute decline in FVC% predicted of &gt; 10% was associated with a significant deterioration in SGRQ (increasing by 9.08 units; 95% CI: 2.48 to 15.67; p = 0.007), while patients with stable or improved FVC had no significantly change in SGRQ. Patients with a &gt; 10% decrease of DLCO % predicted also had a significant increase in SGRQ (+ 7.79 units; 95% CI: 0.85 to 14.73; p = 0.028), while SQRQ was almost stable in patients with stable or improved DLCO. Patients who died had a significant greater increase in SGRQ total scores (mean 11.8 ± 18.6) at their last follow-up visit prior to death compared to survivors (mean 4.2 ± 18.9; HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.04; p &lt; 0.001). All QoL scores across the follow-up period were significantly worse in hospitalised patients compared to non-hospitalised patients, with the worst scores reported in those hospitalised for acute exacerbations. Conclusions: QoL assessments in the INSIGHTS-IPF registry demonstrate a close relationship between QoL and clinically meaningful changes in lung function, comorbidities, disease duration and clinical course of IPF, including hospitalisation and mortality

Health related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in clinical practice: insights-IPF registry

Background: The INSIGHTS-IPF registry provides one of the largest data sets of clinical data and self-reported patient related outcomes including health related quality of life (QoL) on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to describe associations of various QoL instruments between each other and with patient characteristics at baseline. Methods: Six hundred twenty-three IPF patients with available QoL data (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire SGRQ, UCSD Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire SoB, EuroQol visual analogue scale and index EQ-5D, Well-being Index WHO-5) were analysed. Mean age was 69.6 +/- 8.7 years, 77% were males, mean disease duration 2.0 +/- 3.3 years, FVC pred was 67.5 +/- 17.8%, DLCO pred 35.6 +/- 17%. Results: Mean points were SGRQ total 48.3, UCSD SoB 47.8, EQ-5D VAS 66.8, and WHO-5 13.9. These instruments had a high or very high correlation (exception WHO-5 to EQ-5D VAS with moderate correlation). On bivariate analysis, QoL by SGRQ total was statistically significantly associated with clinical symptoms (NYHA;p < 0.001), number of comorbidities (p < 0.05), hospitalisation rate (p < 0.01) and disease severity (as measured by GAP score, CPI, FVC and 6-min walk test;p < 0.05 each). Multivariate analyses showed a significant association between QoL (by SGRQ total) and IPF duration, FVC, age, NYHA class and indication for long-term oxygen treatment. Conclusions: Overall, IPF patients under real-life conditions have lower QoL compared to those in clinical studies. There is a meaningful relationship between QoL and various patient characteristics

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Allows Discrimination Between Idiopathic Non-specific Interstitial Pneumonia and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mild to Moderate Stages of the Disease

It is unclear whether there are cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters which may indicate poor prognosis in the early course of fibrosing interstitial lung disease. 27 untreated consecutive subjects (13 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP), 14 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); 19 male; age 69 +/- 10 years) were enrolled in this observational pilot study. Subjects underwent routine pulmonary function testing and CPET. Statistically, the t test and the Mann-Whitney-U test were applied in the presence of normal and non-normal distribution (according to Shapiro-Wilk), respectively. Analyzing the whole cohort, only mild functional impairments were determined. Comparison of iNSIP and IPF groups detected significant differences for the CPET parameters V'O(2)Peak[%pred] (p = 0.011), V'O-2/kgPeak (p = 0.033), Watt[%pred] (p = 0.048), V'E/V'CO2 (Rest: p = 0.016; AT: p = 0.011; Peak: p = 0.019; Slope: p = 0.040), V'E/V'O-2 (Rest: p = 0.033 AT: p = 0.014; Peak: p = 0.035). CPET parameters may indicate IPF-specific impairments even in mild disease. It may be hypothesized that these parameters are early biomarkers of poor prognosis

From the infant to the geriatric patient—Strategies for inhalation therapy in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract Inhalation therapy represents the standard of care in children, adolescents as well as in young, middle‐aged and geriatric adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there are only few recommendations for the choice of inhalation devices, which consider both, age‐specific limitations in young and geriatric patients. Transition concepts are lacking. In this narrative review, the available device technologies and the evidence for age‐specific problems are discussed. Pressurized metered‐dose inhalers may be favoured in patients who fulfill all cognitive, coordinative and manual power requirements. Breath‐actuated metered‐dose inhalers, soft‐mist inhalers or the use of add‐on devices such as spacers, face masks and valved holding chambers may be suitable for patients with mild to moderate impairments of these variables. In these cases, available resources of personal assistance by educated family members or caregivers should be used to allow metered‐dose inhaler therapy. Dry powder inhalers may be reserved for patients with a sufficient peak inspiratory flow and good cognitive and manual abilities. Nebulizers may be indicated in persons who are either unwilling or unable to use handheld inhaler devices. After initiation of a specific inhalation therapy, close monitoring is essential to reduce handling mistakes. An algorithm is developed that considers age and relevant comorbidities to support the decision‐making process for the choice of an inhaler device