5 research outputs found

    Main characteristics of study participants.

    No full text
    <p>PSA, prostate-specific antigen; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.</p><p>Main characteristics of study participants.</p

    SEPT9_i1 staining in prostate cancer metastases.

    No full text
    <p>Metastatic prostate cancer lesions from bone marrow, lymph node and bone were immunostained with SEPT9_i1. Left panels are low (x100) magnification (LM) (scale bar 100 μm) and right panel are high (x200) magnification (HM) (scale bar 50 μm). Note high level of SEPT9_i1 staining in all metastases.</p

    Correlation between "patients' characteristics" and SEPT9_i1 staining.

    No full text
    <p>PSA, prostate-specific antigen.</p><p>Correlation between "patients' characteristics" and SEPT9_i1 staining.</p

    Characterization of SEPT9_i1 antibodies and scoring of SEPT9_i1 staining intensity.

    No full text
    <p>HEK-293T embryonic human kidney cells were transiently transfected with Flag-SEPT9_i1 construct or empty vector (EV). (A) Whole cellular extracts were prepared and analyzed by 4–20% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (IB) with antibodies to Flag (1:2000), SEPT9_i1 (1:3000), preimmune serum (1:3000) or SEPT9_i1 antibody (1:3000) pre-incubated with 10 μM of the immunogen peptide for 4 hours. (B) The same cellular extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using anti-Flag antibody and the immuneprecipitates were subjected to 4–15% SDS-PAGE and then immunoblotted with anti-Flag or anti-SEPT9_i1 antibodies. (C) Representative SEPT9_i1 staining in human prostate cancer specimens. Score 0: no SEPT9_i1 staining, 1: low SEPT9_i1 staining 2: medium SEPT9_i1 staining and 3: high SEPT9_i1 staining. Magnification x200, scale bar 50 μm.</p

    Gleason score correlation with SEPT9_i1 staining intensity.

    No full text
    <p>Mean SEPT9_i1 staining intensity ± SE of each Gleason score group (score 5: 3 patients, score 6: 8 patients, score 7: 19 patients, score 8: 3 patients, score 9: 6 patients and score 10: 2 patients) was calculated using either visual scoring (A) or automated image analysis with the ARIOL-SL50 system (B).</p
    corecore