Neurophobia in Brazil: Detecting and Preventing a Global Issue

ABSTRACT Neurophobia is a global issue known as a fear of Neurology and Neurosciences by medical students and physicians, and it may contribute to a reduced number of trained neurologists and a global misunderstanding of neurological diseases among physicians. To date, there are no studies that address the issue of Neurophobia in Brazil. The present study aimed to evaluate the perception of Neurology and Neurosciences among Brazilian medical students. Students from four medical schools in the state of Pará, in the second (pre-clinical phase), fourth (clinical phase) and sixth (internship) years of the course, were submitted to a self-administered and written questionnaire divided into two sections: the first section included questions assessing their perceived level of interest, level of knowledge, degree of difficulty, confidence in examining patients, quality of teaching in medical school and likelihood of pursuing the career, concerning different clinical specialties (Cardiology, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Nephrology, Neurology, Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology). In the second section, there were questions about possible reasons why Neurology was perceived as a difficult subject and possible ways to improve neurological education. A total of 486 questionnaires were completed. Neurology was perceived as the most difficult clinical specialty (mean score 4.00; p < 0.001), in which students feel least confident about conducting physical examinations (mean score 2.97; p < 0.001), and with the worst quality of teaching (mean score 3.12; p < 0.001). The main cause of Neurophobia was the need to know neuroanatomy and neurophysiology (very important reason for 39.4% of students), and the most frequently suggested method to improve neurological education was through more and better bedside tutorials (very important factor — 53.3%). Students developing extracurricular activities, women and older students had more unfavorable opinions about Neurology. Neurophobia is also present in Brazil, and new educational approaches must be proposed to improve the misperception of Neurology by medical students. The Medical Education Commission of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology should propose guidelines on Neurology teaching at undergraduate level

Neurophobia in Brazil: Detecting and Preventing a Global Issue

<div><p>ABSTRACT Neurophobia is a global issue known as a fear of Neurology and Neurosciences by medical students and physicians, and it may contribute to a reduced number of trained neurologists and a global misunderstanding of neurological diseases among physicians. To date, there are no studies that address the issue of Neurophobia in Brazil. The present study aimed to evaluate the perception of Neurology and Neurosciences among Brazilian medical students. Students from four medical schools in the state of Pará, in the second (pre-clinical phase), fourth (clinical phase) and sixth (internship) years of the course, were submitted to a self-administered and written questionnaire divided into two sections: the first section included questions assessing their perceived level of interest, level of knowledge, degree of difficulty, confidence in examining patients, quality of teaching in medical school and likelihood of pursuing the career, concerning different clinical specialties (Cardiology, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Nephrology, Neurology, Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology). In the second section, there were questions about possible reasons why Neurology was perceived as a difficult subject and possible ways to improve neurological education. A total of 486 questionnaires were completed. Neurology was perceived as the most difficult clinical specialty (mean score 4.00; p < 0.001), in which students feel least confident about conducting physical examinations (mean score 2.97; p < 0.001), and with the worst quality of teaching (mean score 3.12; p < 0.001). The main cause of Neurophobia was the need to know neuroanatomy and neurophysiology (very important reason for 39.4% of students), and the most frequently suggested method to improve neurological education was through more and better bedside tutorials (very important factor — 53.3%). Students developing extracurricular activities, women and older students had more unfavorable opinions about Neurology. Neurophobia is also present in Brazil, and new educational approaches must be proposed to improve the misperception of Neurology by medical students. The Medical Education Commission of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology should propose guidelines on Neurology teaching at undergraduate level.</p></div

Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital with and without respiratory symptoms

Background: COVID-19 is primarily known as a respiratory illness; however, many patients present to hospital without respiratory symptoms. The association between non-respiratory presentations of COVID-19 and outcomes remains unclear. We investigated risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients with no respiratory symptoms (NRS) and respiratory symptoms (RS) at hospital admission. Methods: This study describes clinical features, physiological parameters, and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients, stratified by the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms at hospital admission. RS patients had one or more of: cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose or wheezing; while NRS patients did not. Results: Of 178,640 patients in the study, 86.4&nbsp;% presented with RS, while 13.6&nbsp;% had NRS. NRS patients were older (median age: NRS: 74 vs RS: 65) and less likely to be admitted to the ICU (NRS: 36.7&nbsp;% vs RS: 37.5&nbsp;%). NRS patients had a higher crude in-hospital case-fatality ratio (NRS 41.1&nbsp;% vs. RS 32.0&nbsp;%), but a lower risk of death after adjusting for confounders (HR 0.88 [0.83-0.93]). Conclusion: Approximately one in seven COVID-19 patients presented at hospital admission without respiratory symptoms. These patients were older, had lower ICU admission rates, and had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for confounders