Role of metformin in diabetes treatment--is metformin falling from grace?

Two recent meta-analyses focused on the risk-benefit ratio of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Both studies conclude that the risk-benefit ratio of metformin monotherapy or combined with insulin is uncertain. In our opinion, the interpretation of the known literature in these meta-analyses could be flawed. To ascertain the effects of metformin on cardiovascular end-points, a follow-up period of at least 8 years proved necessary. However, these meta-analyses included a number of studies with a limited follow-up period, thus impairing the possibility to make a proper comparison of the long-term effects of metformin. In addition, one meta-analysis based the weight of included studies on the number of events in all studies, including two safety studies, as opposed to the number of studied patients.</p

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Clinicopathological Tumor Characteristics in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Female breast cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the contributors to the poor prognosis of breast cancer. This raises the issue that T2DM might be associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, which indicate pivotal prognostic values. This study aimed to clarify the differences in breast cancer characteristics at diagnosis between patients with and without pre-existing T2DM. Our meta-analyses showed an increased risk of being diagnosed with a late-stage tumor, large tumor size, and invasive lymph nodes in patients with T2DM. No significant results were observed for grade, estrogen/progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor. These findings indicate an association between T2DM and advanced breast cancer at diagnosis, and suggest that the more active role of breast cancer screening should be further explored for women with T2DM. ABSTRACT: Poor prognosis caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with breast cancer is conferred, while the association between T2DM and breast tumor aggressiveness is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to clarify the differences in breast cancer characteristics, including stage, size, lymph node status, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her2), between patients with and without pre-existing T2DM. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies from 1 January 2010 to 2 July 2021. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by using a random effects model. T2DM was significantly associated with tumor stages III/IV versus cancers in situ and stages I/II (pooled ORs (pOR), 95% CI: 1.19; 1.04–1.36, p = 0.012), tumor size >20 versus ≤20 mm (pOR, 95% CI: 1.18; 1.04–1.35, p = 0.013), and lymph node invasion versus no involvement (pOR, 95% CI: 1.26; 1.05–1.51, p = 0.013). These findings suggest that women with T2DM are at a higher risk of late-stage tumors, large tumor sizes, and invasive lymph nodes at breast cancer diagnosis

Within-Sulfonylurea-Class Evaluation of Time to Intensification with Insulin (ZODIAC-43)

Previous studies have shown that many within-class differences exist between sulfonylureas (SUs), however, whether differences exist regarding the time it takes between initiating an SU and the need to intensify treatment with insulin is unclear. The aim of this study was investigate the relationships between the three frequently used sulphonylureas, prescribed as dual therapy next to metformin, and the time needed to treatment intensification with either insulin or oral triple therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes project Integrating Available Care (ZODIAC) is a prospective observational cohort study set in primary care in the Netherlands. Annually collected data on diabetes medication and clinical variables within ZODIAC are used to evaluate the primary outcome, time to insulin and secondary outcome, time to either insulin or triple oral therapy. For statistical analysis a time-dependent cox proportional hazard model was used.3507 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 61 (SD 11.4) and a median HbA1c of 6.8% [IQR 6.4-7.4] (50.8 mmol/mol [IQR 46.4-57.4]).The hazard ratio (HR) for the primary endpoint was 1.10 (95% CI 0.78-1.54) for metformin/glimepiride and 0.93 (95% CI 0.67-1.30) for metformin/tolbutamide with metformin/gliclazide as reference group. The HR for the secondary outcome was 1.04 (95% CI 0.78-1.40) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.64-1.13), respectively.In this large Dutch primary care cohort, new users of neither gliclazide, glimepiride nor tolbutamide as dual therapy with metformin, resulted in differences in the time needed for further treatment intensification

The Lipid Profile and Mortality Risk in Elderly Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Ten-Year Follow-Up Study (ZODIAC-13)

BACKGROUND:The precise relationship between the lipid profile and mortality in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the lipid profile over time, and mortality in elderly patients with T2DM. METHODS AND FINDINGS:In 1998, 881 primary care patients with T2DM aged 60 years and older participated in the ZODIAC study, a prospective observational study. The cohort was divided into two age categories: 60-75 years and older than 75 years. Updated means of all lipid profile indices were calculated after a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. These values were used as time dependent covariates in a Cox proportional hazard model. The cholesterol-HDL ratio and LDL-cholesterol were positively related to both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the low age group. In contrast, except for the triglyceride level, none of the other lipid profile indices were related to all-cause mortality in patients aged over 75 years. The mortality risk decreased by 17% (95%CI: 5% to 27%) for each 1 mmol/L higher serum level of triglycerides. The relationships between the various lipid profile indices and cardiovascular mortality were not significant. However, the results were different after stratification for diabetes duration. In the subgroup of elderly patients with a diabetes duration of 8 years and longer, higher lipids were predictive of increased cardiovascular mortality. The main limitation of this study is its observational design, which prevents us drawing conclusions about causality. CONCLUSION:Although the lipid profile was not predictive in the overall group of elderly patients, higher lipids were related to increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes of long duration. In order to make valid recommendations concerning lipid-lowering treatment, a randomized controlled trial or a meta-analysis concerning this specific population is mandatory

Analysis of variance for testing method of cement in determination of strength

AbstractThe statistical tools such as descriptive statistics, full factorial design and analysis of source of variation were used to identify the potential factors that impact the validity of testing method for determining the strength of cement. The results showed that personal error impacted both accuracy and precision of test greatly. Experimental time associated with temperature fluctuation resulted in strength variation but did not impact the precision of test in all curing ages. Different compactions did not impact the precision of test but resulted in the strength variation on 3 d and 28 d significantly. Different methods for the initial moist air curing significantly impacted the precision of testing method and resulted in the strength variation of cement on 1 d

Glycemic Control for Colorectal Cancer Survivors Compared to Those without Cancer in the Dutch Primary Care for Type 2 Diabetes:A Prospective Cohort Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: A growing number of colorectal cancer survivors live with type 2 diabetes, as a result of improved cancer diagnosis and treatment. These patients might have worse glycemic control after their cancer diagnosis, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This prospective cohort study evaluated the quality of glycemic control for colorectal cancer survivors, as compared to those without cancer in Dutch primary care for diabetes. During a 10-year follow-up for 57,330 patients, there were 705 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. No clinically relevant difference on the probability of reaching the target HbA1c was observed between colorectal cancer survivors and patients with no history of cancer. These results showed a robust diabetes care system, implying that the glycemic control for colorectal cancer survivors can be delegated to the primary care professionals. ABSTRACT: Cancer survivors with diabetes tend to have worse glycemic control after their cancer diagnosis, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to investigate whether glycemic control differs between colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and those without cancer, among patients with type 2 diabetes being treated in the Dutch primary care. The Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes project Integrating Available Care database was linked with the Dutch Cancer Registry (n = 71,648, 1998–2014). The cases were those with stage 0–III CRC, and the controls were those without cancer history. The primary and secondary outcomes were the probability of reaching the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target and the mean of HbA1c during follow-up, respectively. Mixed linear modeling was applied, where the status of CRC was a time-varying variable. Among the 57,330 patients included, 705 developed CRC during follow-up. The mean probability of reaching the HbA1c target during follow-up was 73% versus 74% (p = 0.157) for CRC survivors versus those without cancer, respectively. The mean HbA1c was 51.1 versus 50.8 mmol/mol (p = 0.045) among CRC survivors versus those without cancer, respectively. We observed a clinically comparable glycemic control among the CRC survivors without cancer, indicating that glycemic control for CRC survivors can be delegated to primary care professionals