15 research outputs found

    Endocrine therapy and urogenital outcomes among women with a breast cancer diagnosis

    Get PDF
    Endocrine therapy for breast cancer can exacerbate menopausal symptoms. The association between endocrine therapy and common pelvic floor disorders including urinary incontinence has rarely been evaluated. We examined urogenital and sexual side effects among women with a breast cancer diagnosis, comparing endocrine therapy users to nonusers

    Genome-wide structural variant analysis identifies risk loci for non-Alzheimer’s dementias

    Get PDF
    We characterized the role of structural variants, a largely unexplored type of genetic variation, in two non-Alzheimer’s dementias, namely Lewy body dementia (LBD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD)/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). To do this, we applied an advanced structural variant calling pipeline (GATK-SV) to short-read whole-genome sequence data from 5,213 European-ancestry cases and 4,132 controls. We discovered, replicated, and validated a deletion in TPCN1 as a novel risk locus for LBD and detected the known structural variants at the C9orf72 and MAPT loci as associated with FTD/ALS. We also identified rare pathogenic structural variants in both LBD and FTD/ALS. Finally, we assembled a catalog of structural variants that can be mined for new insights into the pathogenesis of these understudied forms of dementia

    To "Err" is Human: The Nature of Phonological "Errors" in Language Development

    No full text
    In children, two types of phonological U errors" may occur: slips of the tongue\ud and pathological speech. A slip of the tongue is considered a normal, nonsystematic\ud U error", whereas a series of consistent speech U errors" is labeled as a\ud speech pathology. Both types of U errors" follow phonotactic constraints defined\ud by the target grammar, and may result in substitutions and omissions of sounds\ud in conversation. They differ traditionally in two key ways: (1) while slips are\ud unique utterances that generally occur only once, the disfluencies are consistent\ud in a pathology, and (2) the speaker is able to notice and correct their error when\ud they make a slip, but it is not the case in a speech pathology. Relevant research to\ud both types of U errors" will be presented for comparison purposes, and theoretical\ud explanations will be offered. I will propose that a deficit in self-monitoring exists\ud in those with disordered phonology, in order to explain why U errors" repeat

    A comparison of CDKN2A mutation detection within the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL)

    No full text
    CDKN2A is the major melanoma susceptibility gene so far identified, but only 40% of three or more case families have identified mutations. A comparison of mutation detection rates was carried out by “blind” exchange of samples across GenoMEL, the Melanoma Genetics Consortium, to establish the false negative detection rates. Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) screening results from 451 samples were compared to screening data from nine research groups in which the initial mutation screen had been done predominantly by sequencing. Three samples with mutations identified at the local centres were not detected by the DHPLC screen. No additional mutations were detected by DHPLC. Mutation detection across groups within GenoMEL is carried out to a consistently high standard. The relatively low rate of CDKN2A mutation detection is not due to failure to detect mutations and implies the existence of other high penetrance melanoma susceptibility genes

    Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma‐prone families from three continents

    No full text
    Background: The major factors individually reported to be associated with an increased frequency of CDKN2A mutations are increased number of patients with melanoma in a family, early age at melanoma diagnosis, and family members with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) or pancreatic cancer. Methods: These four features were examined in 385 families with [>=]3 patients with melanoma pooled by 17 GenoMEL groups, and these attributes were compared across continents. Results: Overall, 39% of families had CDKN2A mutations ranging from 20% (32/162) in Australia to 45% (29/65) in North America to 57% (89/157) in Europe. All four features in each group, except pancreatic cancer in Australia (p = 0.38), individually showed significant associations with CDKN2A mutations, but the effects varied widely across continents. Multivariate examination also showed different predictors of mutation risk across continents. In Australian families, [>=]2 patients with MPM, median age at melanoma diagnosis [<=]40 years and [>=]6 patients with melanoma in a family jointly predicted the mutation risk. In European families, all four factors concurrently predicted the risk, but with less stringent criteria than in Australia. In North American families, only [>=]1 patient with MPM and age at diagnosis [<=]40 years simultaneously predicted the mutation risk. Conclusions: The variation in CDKN2A mutations for the four features across continents is consistent with the lower melanoma incidence rates in Europe and higher rates of sporadic melanoma in Australia. The lack of a pancreatic cancer-CDKN2A mutation relationship in Australia probably reflects the divergent spectrum of mutations in families from Australia versus those from North America and Europe. GenoMEL is exploring candidate host, genetic and/or environmental risk factors to better understand the variation observe
    corecore