United States Air Force Academy get-away-special flexible beam experiment

The Department of Astronautics at the United States Air Force Academy is currently planning to fly an experiment in a NASA Get-Away-Special (GAS) canister. The experiment was named the flex beam experiment. The primary technical objective of the flex beam experiment is to measure the damping of a thin beam in the vacuum and zero G environment of space. By measuring the damping in space, it is hoped to determine the amount of damping the beam normally experiences due to the gravitational forces present on Earth. This will allow validation of models which predict the dynamics of thin beams in the space environment. The experiment will also allow the Academy to develop and improve its ability to perform experiments within the confines of a NASA GAS canister. Several experiments, of limited technical difficulty, were flown by the Academy. More complex experiments are currently planned and it is hoped to learn techniques with each space shuttle flight

Topology-changing shape optimization with the genetic algorithm

The goal is to take a traditional shape optimization problem statement and modify it slightly to allow for prescribed changes in topology. This modification enables greater flexibility in the choice of parameters for the topology optimization problem, while improving the direct physical relevance of the results. This modification involves changing the optimization problem statement from a nonlinear programming problem into a form of mixed-discrete nonlinear programing problem. The present work demonstrates one possible way of using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) to solve such a problem, including the use of “masking bits” and a new modification to the bit-string affinity (BSA) termination criterion specifically designed for problems with “masking bits.” A simple ten-bar truss problem proves the utility of the modified BSA for this type of problem. A more complicated two dimensional bracket problem is solved using both the proposed approach and a more traditional topology optimization approach (Solid Isotropic Microstructure with Penalization or SIMP) to enable comparison. The proposed approach is able to solve problems with both local and global constraints, which is something traditional methods cannot do. The proposed approach has a significantly higher computational burden — on the order of 100 times larger than SIMP, although the proposed approach is able to offset this with parallel computing