The association between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty neck-shaft angle on postoperative patient experienced shoulder disability: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the glenoid component used in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was reduced to improve functional outcomes. This led to a decreased abduction but increased external rotation ability of patients who underwent RTSA. The impact of the decreased NSA on patient-reported shoulder disability is unknown but may have important implications for functional ability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the difference in patient experienced shoulder disability between an NSA of 135° and 155° 12 months after RTSA. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 109 patients undergoing RTSA were included. In 68 patients, a glenoid component with an NSA of 135° was used and 41 patients received a glenoid component with an NSA of 155°. The primary outcome was Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at 12 months and change scores between baseline and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were complications, Constant Murley Score, Numeric Rating Scale, active forward elevation and external rotation ability. Differences between groups were tested with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: A mean difference of 10.0 in 12 months postoperative DASH scores between NSA groups was observed in favor of the 135° NSA (P = .004), which did not exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. DASH changes scores did not differ between NSA groups (P = .652). Mean postoperative Constant Murley Score at 12 months was 11.1 higher in the 135° NSA group (P = .013). No differences were observed in complications (P = .721) and postoperative pain (P = .710) between groups. Difference in postoperative external rotation and forward elevation at 12 months was 10° (P = .022) and 20° (P = .046), respectively, in favor of the 135° NSA group, exceeding Minimal Clinically Important Differences. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically important difference in patient-reported shoulder disability (DASH) was found between both groups, despite a larger range of motion in the 135° NSA group. This study is the first to show the impact of NSA on patient-reported shoulder disability using the DASH

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after three different surgical treatments for resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder:a short-term randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A preferable surgical treatment for patients with conservative therapy-resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder is still a matter of debate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare short-term clinical and radiological results of three surgical treatment options for these patients. METHODS: A multicenter randomized trial was conducted. Sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive 1. subacromial decompression (Group SAD), 2. debridement of calcifications (Group D), or 3. debridement of calcifications with SAD (Group D + SAD). Stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. The primary outcome was an improvement in VAS for pain (pVAS) 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were an improvement in pVAS 6 weeks postoperatively, functional outcomes (CMS, DASH, ASES), radiological outcome, additional treatments, and complications. RESULTS: The improvement in pVAS was significant in all groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ between the groups after 6 months. Six weeks postoperatively, the improvement in pVAS was significantly (p = 0.03) less in Group SAD compared to Group D + SAD (16.5 mm, SD 19.3 mm vs 33.1 mm, SD 19.7 mm, respectively). The mean size of calcifications decreased significantly in all groups (p < 0.0001). In Group SAD, the size of the calcifications decreased less (p = 0.04) compared to Group D and Group D + SAD after 6 weeks. Group SAD received more additional treatments (p = 0.003) compared to Group D + SAD (9 vs 1), which were mainly subacromial cortisone injections. CONCLUSIONS: All patient groups showed significant pain relief and an improvement in shoulder function 6 months after surgery. However, patients in Group SAD showed inferior pain relief and less improvement in DASH score after 6 weeks. Furthermore, this group required more postoperative additional treatments. No significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes were observed between patients in Group D compared to Group D + SAD. Therefore, an arthroscopic debridement without subacromial decompression seems to be advisable for patients with therapy-resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Level of evidence 2, Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial. IRB METC Zuyderland MC. Number: 14-T-112. Registered at trialregister.nl NL 4947

Handheld Ultrasound Does not Replace Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of handheld ultrasound (HHUS) alone versus conventional ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of rotator cuff tears and versus MRI plus computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of fatty infiltration. Methods: Adult patients with shoulder complaints were included in this study. HHUS of the shoulder was performed twice by an orthopedic surgeon and once by a radiologist. RCTs, tear width, retraction and FI were measured. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the HHUS was calculated using a Cohen's kappa coefficient. Criterion and concurrent validity were calculated using a Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Sixty-one patients (64 shoulders) were included in this study. Intra-rater agreement of HHUS for assessment of RCTs (? = 0.914, supraspinatus) and FI (? = 0.844, supraspinatus) was moderate to strong. Interrater agreement was none to minimal for the diagnosis of RCTs (? = 0.465, supraspinatus) and FI (? = 0.346, supraspinatus). Concurrent validity of HHUS compared to MRI was fair for diagnosis of RCTs (r = 0.377, supraspinatus) and fair-to-moderate FI (r = 0.608, supraspinatus). HHUS shows a sensitivity of 81.1% and specificity of 62.5% for diagnosis of supraspinatus tears, 60% and 93.1% for subscapularis tears, 55.6% and 88.9% for infraspinatus tears. Conclusions: On the basis of findings in this study, we conclude that HHUS is an aid in diagnosis of RCTs and higher degrees of FI in patients who are not obese, but it does not replace MRI as the gold standard. Further clinical studies on the application of HHUS comparing HHUS devices in larger patient populations and healthy patients are required to identify its utility in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level III

The development of the Patient Expectations of Shoulder Surgery survey

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction after a surgical procedure is dependent on meeting preoperative expectations. There is currently no patient expectations survey available for patients undergoing shoulder surgery that is validated, reliable, and easy to use in daily practice. The aim of this study was to develop a Patient Expectations of Shoulder Surgery (PESS) survey. METHODS: In 315 patients, answers to an open-ended question about patient expectations were collected before shoulder surgery to develop the PESS survey. Patients' expectations of the PESS survey were associated with clinical outcome (change of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score). Content validity was assessed by a panel of 10 patients scheduled for shoulder surgery, and test-retest reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: Six items were included in the PESS survey: pain relief, improved range of motion, improved ability to perform daily activities, improved ability to perform work, improved ability to participate in recreational activities and sports, and stop shoulder from dislocating. Three of the 6 expectations were significantly associated with clinical outcome after shoulder surgery. Test-retest reliability was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.52-0.92. DISCUSSION: The PESS survey is a valid and reliable survey that can be used in future clinical research and in daily orthopedic practice. We believe that the preoperative evaluation of patient expectations should be a standard procedure before shoulder surgery

Comparing midterm clinical outcome of surgical versus ultrasound guided needle aspiration of the calcific deposits for therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. A comparative cohort study

Purpose: Comparing the midterm clinical outcome of surgical treatment versus ultrasound guided needle aspiration of the calcific deposits (NACD) treatment for conservative therapy resistant calcifying tendinitis (CT) of the shoulder. The hypothesis is that both surgical treatment and NACD treatment led to a comparable good clinical outcome. Methods: A comparative cohort study was performed (n = 76). The allocation to surgical group (n = 35) or NACD group (n = 41) was the result of a shared decision-making strategy. Primary outcome was decrease in VAS for pain (pVAS). Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D index, DASH score, ASES, VAS for satisfaction, recommendation of treatment, adverse events, cross-over between groups, additional treatments, and symptomatology after care as usual. Results: At midterm follow-up (5.5 years, SD 0.5 years) decrease in pVAS did not differ (p = 0.20) between two groups (60.6 mm, SD 23.3 mm vs 53.4 mm, SD 24.2 mm). Secondary clinical outcomes were also comparable. In 68.3% surgical treatment was avoided. At final follow-up none of the outcome scores differed significantly between the crossed-over patients (n = 13, 31.7%) and the initial surgical group. Discussion: At midterm follow-up surgical and NACD treatment result in comparable clinical outcomes. In 68.3% a surgical treatment could be avoided. In 31.7% the patient eventually needed a surgical treatment after failed NACD treatment. After midterm follow-up these patients showed comparable good clinical outcomes. In our opinion, both NACD and surgical treatment could be considered as a next step treatment option for conservative therapy resistant CT of the shoulder. Though, one should be aware that after a midterm follow-up a high number of patients cross-over to surgical treatment after a NACD treatment

Influence of humeral stem inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on range of motion: a meta-analysis

Hypothesis: The reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as introduced by Grammont, has had many modifications over time. One of these modifications was reducing the neck-shaft angle (NSA) from 155 degrees to 135 degrees. Biomechanical studies indicated that lowering the NSA increases external rotation and reduces abduction and the incidence of scapular notching. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, functional outcome measures, and complications in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, depending on the NSA, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A literature search was conducted (articles published from January 1985 to January 2020) in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and the Cochrane library. All studies reporting outcomes after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff–related disease were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a medialized design (MD) with an NSA of 150-155 degrees and a lateralized design (LD) with an NSA of less than 150 degrees. Pooled effects were calculated in the form of mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions tool for non-Randomized Controlled Trials and the Risk Of Bias 2 tool for Randomized Controlled Trials. Results: A total of 21 studies and 3134 arthroplasties were included: 1366 with an MD and 1678 with an LD. The mean age was 73.0 years (MD 74.0 and LD 72.5). A direct comparative meta-analysis was not feasible, and therefore, all data were compared using the minimal clinically important difference. The MD group demonstrated a larger improvement in abduction (56.76°, 95% CI 37.03-76.49) than the LD group (48.52°, 95% CI 28.27-68.78), however the LD group demonstrated a larger improvement in external rotation with the arm at the side (MD: 7.69°, 95% CI 0.01-15.37; LD: 16.14° 95% CI 7.18-25.09). When looking at the postoperative range of motion, the MD group had more abduction than the LD group (MD: 136.28°, 95% CI 127.36-145.20; LD: 127.77° 95% CI 117.02-138.52). Both designs had a comparable improvement in the Constant Murley score (MD 42.04 points, LD 41.14 points). Lowering the NSA was accompanied by a decrease in dislocation rate (MD: 4.6%; LD: 1.4%; P value .037) and notching rate (MD: 40.3%; LD: 17.3%; P value <.0001). Conclusion: In our analysis, lowering the NSA decreases the amount of abduction but increases the amount of external rotation. This change in range of motion is accompanied by less scapular notching and dislocations. There is no clear impact on functional outcome measures

The Effect of an App for Day-to-Day Postoperative Care Education on Patients With Total Knee Replacement: Randomized Controlled Trial

Contains fulltext : 209375.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial

Background: Good clinical results have been reported for both surgical and conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare functional and radiologic improvement after surgical and conservative treatment of degenerative rotator cuff tears. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial that included 56 patients with a degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tear between January 2009 and December 2012; 31 patients were treated conservatively, and rotator cuff repair was performed in 25 patients. Outcome measures, including the Constant-Murley score (CMS), visual analog scale (VAS) pain and VAS disability scores, were assessed preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Results: At 12 months postoperatively, the mean CMS was 81.9 (standard deviation [SD], 15.6) in the surgery group vs 73.7 (SD, 18.4) in the conservative group (P = .08). VAS pain (P = .04) and VAS disability (P = .02) were significantly lower in the surgery group at the 12-month follow-up. A subgroup analysis showed postoperative CMS results were significantly better in surgically treated patients without a retear compared with conservatively treated patients (88.5 [SD, 6.2] vs 73.7 [SD, 18.4]). Conclusion: In our population of patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears who were randomly treated by surgery or conservative protocol, we did not observe differences in functional outcome as measured with the CMS 1 year after treatment. However, significant differences in pain and disabilities were observed in favor of surgical treatment. The best outcomes in function and pain were seen in patients with an intact rotator cuff postoperatively. (C) 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees