Interactive analysis of Belgian vital statistics on the Internet.

&lt;p&gt;The purpose of the Centre for Operational Research in Public Health (CORPH) is to optimize the accessibility to health information, thus making it possible to measure and follow up the health status of the Belgian population. The Standardized Procedures for Mortality Analysis (SPMA) software was developed in order to facilitate the use of vital statistics for health policy-makers and scientific researchers. Nowadays, SPMA is available on the Internet, because accessibility to health information is crucial. SPMA serves via a system of menus as the interface between databases (population, birth, and mortality) on one hand and statistical procedures on the other hand. Users can choose the parameters such as year, cause of death, geographical level, and statistical indicator, and so dynamic reports are produced &#039;on demand&#039;. These procedures are available for the following modules: overall mortality, specific cause mortality, and perinatal statistics. Analysis can be carried out for one specific year or for a period over time. Pre-defined procedures accessible through menus make SPMA user-friendly, as it can be used without any preliminary knowledge of the statistical package. Tables, charts, or maps display the results. Users need only an Internet browser to access the application.&lt;/p&gt;</p

Quality of care assessment using GPs&#039; electronic patient records: do we need data from home visits?

&lt;p&gt;The paper tackles the topic of collecting data from home visits using the electronic patient record (EPR) of general practitioners (GPs), in a context with a high proportion of home visits in primary care. Since data from home visits, representing about 40% of GPs&#039; consultations in Belgium, are rather scarcely recorded in the EPR, we wanted to study the impact of not taking into account home visits for quality assessment in primary care. Five quality indicators, which measured the accordance of the delivered care with guidelines on the management of osteoarthritis, were compared between a pooled database (consultations and home visits) and a restricted database (after removal of home visits). Our findings suggest that removing home visits from a database collected from primary care may provide a slight modification of the estimate of the quality of care, whereas conclusions on quality improvement remain relatively stable. Quality of care assessment with the EPR of GPs seems not to be dramatically hampered by the poor recording rate of home visits in the EPR.&lt;/p&gt;</p